Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A research synthesis was performed to (1) critically review controlled studies evaluating effects of different intensities of stroke rehabilitation in terms of disabilities and impairments and (2) quantify patterns by calculating summary effect sizes. The influences of organizational setting of rehabilitation management, blind recording, and amount of rehabilitation on the summary effect sizes were calculated. METHODS A Medline literature search was performed for a critical review of the literature. The internal and external validity of the studies was evaluated. In addition, a meta-analysis was performed by applying the fixed (Hedges's g) effects model. RESULTS The effects of different intensities of rehabilitation were studied in nine controlled studies involving 1051 patients. Analysis of the methodological quality revealed scores varying from 14% to 47% of the maximum feasible score. Meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant summary effect size for activities of daily living (0.28 +/- 0.12). Lower summary effect sizes (0.19 +/- 0.17) were found for studies in which experimental and control groups were treated in the same setting compared with studies in which the two groups of patients were treated in different settings (0.40 +/- 0.19). Variables defined on a neuromuscular level (0.37 +/- 0.24) showed larger summary effect sizes than variables defined on a functional level (0.10 +/- 0.21). Weighting individual effect sizes for the difference in amount of rehabilitation between experimental and control groups resulted in larger summary effect sizes for activities of daily living and functional outcome parameters for studies that were not confounded by organizational setting. CONCLUSIONS A small but statistically significant intensity-effect relationship in the rehabilitation of stroke patients was found. Insufficient contrast in the amount of rehabilitation between experimental and control conditions, organizational setting of rehabilitation management, lack of blinding procedures, and heterogeneity of patient characteristics were major confounding factors.

[1]  M Robinson,et al.  Effects of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabilitation. , 1970, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  B. Tichácek,et al.  [Trends in epidemiology]. , 1977, Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Hygiene und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[3]  How much physical therapy for patients with stroke? , 1978 .

[4]  T C Chalmers,et al.  A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. , 1981, Controlled clinical trials.

[5]  K. Lind.  A synthesis of studies on stroke rehabilitation. , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.

[6]  M. E. Smith,et al.  Therapy impact on functional outcome in a controlled trial of stroke rehabilitation. , 1982, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  E. Hamrin.  II. Early activation in stroke: does it make a difference? , 1982, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[8]  D. Wade,et al.  Therapy after stroke: amounts, determinants and effects. , 1984, International rehabilitation medicine.

[9]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[10]  J. Salonen,et al.  The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke--a controlled trial. , 1985, Stroke.

[11]  P Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Clinical observations on recovery from stroke. , 1988, Advances in neurology.

[12]  S. Waxman.  Functional recovery in neurological disease , 1988 .

[13]  B. Dobkin.  Focused stroke rehabilitation programs do not improve outcome. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[14]  M. Reding,et al.  Focused stroke rehabilitation programs improve outcome. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[15]  M. Jenicek,et al.  Meta-analysis in medicine. Where we are and where we want to go. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  E. Ernst,et al.  A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. , 1990, Stroke.

[17]  R. Wagenaar,et al.  Effects of stroke rehabilitation, I : a critical review of the literature , 1991 .

[18]  D. Wade,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  C D Naylor,et al.  Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  D. Wade,et al.  Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. , 1992, BMJ.

[21]  K J Ottenbacher,et al.  The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. , 1993, Archives of neurology.

[22]  Confounds of insensitivity and blind luck: statistical conclusion validity in stroke rehabilitation clinical trials. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  P. Wolf,et al.  Cerebellar Infarction: Clinical and Anatomic Observations in 66 Cases , 1993, Stroke.

[24]  C. Richards,et al.  Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Do stroke units save lives? , 1993, The Lancet.

[26]  Lalit Kalra,et al.  Improving Stroke Rehabilitation: A Controlled Study , 1993, Stroke.

[27]  R. Rosenthal.  Parametric measures of effect size. , 1994 .

[28]  L. Kalra.  The Influence of Stroke Unit Rehabilitation on Functional Recovery From Stroke , 1994, Stroke.

[29]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Fortnightly Review: So stroke units save lives: where do we go from here? , 1994 .

[30]  R. Adams,et al.  A dose-response relationship between amount of weight-bearing exercise and walking outcome following cerebrovascular accident. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  Betsy Jane Becker,et al.  Combining significance levels. , 1994 .

[32]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Combining estimates of effect size. , 1994 .

[33]  M. Cho,et al.  Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature. , 1994, JAMA.

[34]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  Fixed-Effects Models , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[35]  R. Keith,et al.  Acute and subacute rehabilitation for stroke: a comparison. , 1995, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[36]  D. Cook,et al.  Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Stroke Units: Their Role in Acute Stroke Management , 1995 .

[38]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[39]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[40]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? , 1996, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[41]  R. Zorowitz,et al.  Functional outcome of hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke patients after in-patient rehabilitation. , 1996, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[42]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Predicting disability in stroke--a critical review of the literature. , 1996, Age and ageing.

[43]  R. Werner,et al.  Effectiveness of an intensive outpatient rehabilitation program for postacute stroke patients. , 1996, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[44]  J. Gladman,et al.  Specialist rehabilitation after stroke , 1996, BMJ.