Is Empathy the Key ? Effective Communication via Instant Messaging

Instant Messaging (IM) has become an effective and convenient way for many to chat in real-time, over a distance with friends, family, student peers and colleagues. Messaging Tools such as Microsoft’s MSN® Messenger or Yahoo!® Messenger typically support text chat, show a picture of each interlocutor, and allow exchanging emoticons which are small emotional icons representing ones feelings. In this paper, we investigate how different ways of visualising such emotions affect the experience of an IM user. We created a two-person messaging application that represents each interlocutor as a 3D character, or avatar, capable of expressing emotion through facial expressions. Results obtained strongly suggest that emotional expressiveness in avatars increases involvement in the interaction between the participants. This has a positive effect on their subjective experience. Further, we identify empathy as a key component for creating a more enjoyable experience and greater harmony between spatially separated people communicating via IM technology. Directions for future research are outlined.

[1]  J. Cappella.  TALK AND SILENCE SEQUENCES IN INFORMAL CONVERSATIONS II , 1979 .

[2]  D. Norman.  Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[3]  Tanya L. Chartrand,et al.  Consequences of automatic goal pursuit and the case of nonconscious mimicry. , 2003 .

[4]  Savoy Court,et al.  Do "Attractive Things Work Better"? An Exploration of Search Tool Visualisations , 2005 .

[5]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  eMuu : an embodied emotional character for the ambient intelligent home , 2002 .

[6]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Effect of Perceived Hedonic Quality on Product Appealingness , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Marc Fabri,et al.  Mediating the expression of emotion in educational collaborative virtual environments: an experimental study , 2004, Virtual Reality.

[8]  Ilona Heldal,et al.  Collaborating in networked immersive spaces: as good as being there together? , 2001, Comput. Graph..

[9]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  P. Jordan.  Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors , 2000 .

[11]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[12]  Edwin H. Blake,et al.  Conceptual priming as a determinant of presence in virtual environments , 2003, AFRIGRAPH '03.

[13]  P. Ekman,et al.  Facial Action Coding System: Manual , 1978 .

[14]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Copresence and Interaction in Virtual Environments: An Overview of the Range of Issues , 2005 .

[15]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Digital Chameleons , 2005, Psychological science.

[16]  M. Argyle.  Bodily communication, 2nd ed. , 1988 .

[17]  David Moore,et al.  The use of emotionally expressive avatars in Collaborative Virtual Environments , 2005 .

[18]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[19]  Tomoko Koda,et al.  Agents with faces : a study on the effects of personification of software agents , 1996 .

[20]  S Nichols,et al.  Virtual Reality Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE) : methodological and the theoretical issues. , 1999 .

[21]  W. S. Reilly,et al.  Believable Social and Emotional Agents. , 1996 .

[22]  Mel Slater,et al.  How Colorful Was Your Day? Why Questionnaires Cannot Assess Presence in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[23]  Michael Gerhard,et al.  A Hybrid Avatar/Agent Model for Educational CVEs , 2003 .

[24]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Empathy and attitudes: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Andrew J. Cowell,et al.  Manipulation of non-verbal interaction style and demographic embodiment to increase anthropomorphic computer character credibility , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  A. Damasio.  Descarte's error : emotion, reason, and the human brain , 1994 .

[27]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Life-Like Characters , 2004, Cognitive Technologies.

[28]  Mel Slater,et al.  Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire , 1999, Presence.

[29]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  The Responses of People to Virtual Humans in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[30]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[32]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Funology:From Usability to Enjoyment , 2003 .

[33]  F. Biocca,et al.  Criteria And Scope Conditions For A Theory And Measure Of Social Presence , 2001 .

[34]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.