Capturing the complexity of water uses and water users within a multi-agent framework

Due to the hydrological and socio-economic complexity of water use within river basins and even sub-basins, it is a considerable challenge to manage water resources in an efficient, equitable and sustainable way. This paper shows that multi-agent simulation (MAS) is a promising approach to better understand the complexity of water uses and water users within sub-basins. This approach is especially suitable to take the collective action into account when simulating the outcome of technical innovation and policy change. A case study from Chile is used as an example to demonstrate the potential of the MAS framework. Chile has played a pioneering role in water policy reform by privatizing water rights and promoting trade in such rights, devolving irrigation management authority to user groups, and privatizing the provision of irrigation infrastructure. The paper describes the different components of a MAS model developed for four micro-watersheds in the Maule river basin. Preliminary results of simulation experiments are presented, which show the impacts of technical change and of informal rental markets on household income and water use efficiency. The paper also discusses how the collective action problems in water markets and in small-scale and large-scale infrastructure provision can be captured by the MAS model. To promote the use of the MAS approach for planning purposes, a collaborative research and learning framework has been established, with a recently created multi-stakeholder platform at the regional level (Comisión Regional de Recursos Hidricos) as the major partner. Finally, the paper discusses the potentials of using MAS models for water resources management, such as increasing transparency as an aspect of good governance. The challenges, for example the need to build trust in the model, are discussed as well.

[1]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Empirical based agent-based modeling Creating Agents and Landscapes for Multiagent Systems from Random Samples , 2006 .

[2]  Marco G A Huigen,et al.  First principles of the MameLuke multi-actor modelling framework for land use change, illustrated with a Philippine case study. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Todd Sandler,et al.  Collective Action: Theory and Applications , 1992 .

[4]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: A simulation tool , 2001 .

[5]  Gérard Weisbuch,et al.  Environment and institutions: a complex dynamical systems approach. , 2000 .

[6]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Role-Playing Games, Models and Negotiation Processes , 2003 .

[7]  Ximing Cai,et al.  Integrated economichydrologic water modeling at the basin scale: the Maipo river basin , 2000 .

[8]  François Bousquet,et al.  Agent-Based modelling, game theory and natural resource management issues , 2001 .

[9]  M. Janssen Complexity and Ecosystem Management: The Theory and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems , 2003 .

[10]  Dawn C. Parker,et al.  Measuring pattern outcomes in an agent-based model of edge-effect externalities using spatial metrics , 2004 .

[11]  M. Rosegrant,et al.  Water Allocation Mechanisms: Principles and Examples , 1997 .

[12]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Multi-agent simulation for the targeting of development policies in less-favored areas , 2006 .

[14]  A. Balmann Farm-Based Modelling of Regional Structural Change: A Cellular Automata Approach , 1997 .

[15]  A. Paassen Bridging the gap: computer model enhanced learning for natural resource management in Burkina Faso , 2004 .

[16]  R. Meinzen-Dick,et al.  Sustainable water user associations. lessons from a literature review , 1994 .

[17]  K. Happe Agricultural policies and farm structures: agent-based modelling and application to EU-policy reform , 2004 .

[18]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Agent-based simulation of organic farming conversion in Allier département. , 2002 .

[19]  R. Hinde,et al.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Collective Action , 2010 .

[20]  R. Meinzen-Dick,et al.  Collective action, property rights, and devolution of natural resource management: exchange of knowledge and implications for policy , 2000 .

[21]  Munther J. Haddadin,et al.  Optimal water management and conflict resolution: The Middle East Water Project , 2002 .

[22]  Todd Sandler,et al.  The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods: Alternative mechanisms for provision of public goods , 1996 .

[23]  A. Subramanian User organizations for sustainable water services , 1997 .

[24]  R. Meinzen-Dick,et al.  Negotiating Water Rights , 2000 .

[25]  Nicholas Mark Gotts,et al.  Agent-Based Simulation in the Study of Social Dilemmas , 2003, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[26]  Herbert Lang,et al.  Advanced flood forecasting in Alpine watersheds by coupling meteorological observations and forecasts with a distributed hydrological model , 2002 .

[27]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Trade -offs, efficiency gains and technical change - Modeling water management and land use within a multiple-agent framework , 2002 .