Students Reasoning Capabilities to Solve HOTS Geometry Materials

This study aims to describe students’ reasoning abilities to solve HOTS questions on geometry material. Type of this research is descriptive qualitative. Subjects of the research were 10 students of 12th grade at Senior High School which were taken using a purposive sampling technique. Data collection was obtained from the result of reasoning ability tests and interviews. The validity of the data in this study used a triangulation method. Based on the analysis of data obtained: 40% of students can submit allegations, students that can do mathematical manipulation and give a reason with proof through the solution both of them are 30%, and only 10% of students can draw conclusions from statements and check the validity of an argument. The results of this study indicate that students’ reasoning abilities are still low. Many students are not able to draw conclusions from statements and check the validity of an argument. This is caused students having difficulty determining the distance in space, besides that it has not been able to connect statements that correspond to the problem of question.

[1]  Ayşen Özerem Misconceptions In Geometry And Suggested Solutions For Seventh Grade Students , 2012 .

[2]  I. Pramudya,et al.  Analysis of difficulties in mathematics learning on students with guardian personality type in problem-solving HOTS geometry test , 2018 .

[3]  E. Surya,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY IN VIII GRADE OF SABILINA TEMBUNG JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL , 2017 .

[4]  Di Zhang,et al.  Reasoning and proof in eighth-grade mathematics textbooks in China , 2019, International Journal of Educational Research.

[5]  Ani Minarni,et al.  Developing Instruction Materials Based on Joyful PBL to Improve Students Mathematical Representation Ability , 2017 .

[6]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[7]  Hossein Nassaji,et al.  Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis , 2015 .

[8]  Jenjang Dasar,et al.  Pemecahan Masalah, Penalaran dan Komunikasi , 2004 .

[9]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[10]  Berna Cantürk Günhan A case study on the investigation of reasoning skills in geometry , 2014 .

[11]  E. Elvis Napitupulu,et al.  Analyzing the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Reasoning Skills in Secondary School , 2017 .

[12]  Amir Zaman,et al.  Predictive Validity of Scores in Mathematics for Reasoning Ability in Mathematics for Grade 9 Students in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Based on Curriculum of Mathematics , 2011 .

[13]  Melissa Davidson,et al.  The Taxonomy of Learning , 2008, International anesthesiology clinics.

[14]  Sri Indriati Hasanah,et al.  Mathematical Reasoning: The characteristics of students’ mathematical abilities in problem solving , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[15]  Lawrence R. Ness,et al.  Denzin’s Paradigm Shift: Revisiting Triangulation in Qualitative Research , 2018 .