Development of a validated computer-based preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis with 91% accuracy in 336 adult spinal deformity patients.

OBJECTIVEPseudarthrosis can occur following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery and can lead to instrumentation failure, recurrent pain, and ultimately revision surgery. In addition, it is one of the most expensive complications of ASD surgery. Risk factors contributing to pseudarthrosis in ASD have been described; however, a preoperative model predicting the development of pseudarthrosis does not exist. The goal of this study was to create a preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis based on demographic, radiographic, and surgical factors.METHODSA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, multicenter ASD database was conducted. Study inclusion criteria consisted of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with spinal deformity and surgery for the ASD. From among 82 variables assessed, 21 were used for model building after applying collinearity testing, redundancy, and univariable predictor importance ≥ 0.90. Variables included demographic data along with comorbidities, modifiable surgical variables, baseline coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters, and baseline scores for health-related quality of life measures. Patients groups were determined according to their Lenke radiographic fusion type at the 2-year follow-up: bilateral or unilateral fusion (union) or pseudarthrosis (nonunion). A decision tree was constructed, and internal validation was accomplished via bootstrapped training and testing data sets. Accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the model.RESULTSA total of 336 patients were included in the study (nonunion: 105, union: 231). The model was 91.3% accurate with an AUC of 0.94. From 82 initial variables, the top 21 covered a wide range of areas including preoperative alignment, comorbidities, patient demographics, and surgical use of graft material.CONCLUSIONSA model for predicting the development of pseudarthrosis at the 2-year follow-up was successfully created. This model is the first of its kind for complex predictive analytics in the development of pseudarthrosis for patients with ASD undergoing surgical correction and can aid in clinical decision-making for potential preventative strategies.

[1]  C. Fisher,et al.  Pseudarthrosis in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of incidence, characteristics, and risk factors , 2019, Neurosurgical Review.

[2]  M. Bond,et al.  Scoliosis Research Society–Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification: A Validation Study * , 2018, 50 Landmark Papers.

[3]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Development and Validation of a Novel Adult Spinal Deformity Surgical Invasiveness Score: Analysis of 464 Patients , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[4]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  External validation of the adult spinal deformity (ASD) frailty index (ASD-FI) , 2018, European Spine Journal.

[5]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  An assessment of frailty as a tool for risk stratification in adult spinal deformity surgery. , 2017, Neurosurgical focus.

[6]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Potential of predictive computer models for preoperative patient selection to enhance overall quality-adjusted life years gained at 2-year follow-up: a simulation in 234 patients with adult spinal deformity. , 2017, Neurosurgical focus.

[7]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Development of a preoperative predictive model for major complications following adult spinal deformity surgery. , 2017, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[8]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Development of Validated Computer-based Preoperative Predictive Model for Proximal Junction Failure (PJF) or Clinically Significant PJK With 86% Accuracy Based on 510 ASD Patients With 2-year Follow-up. , 2016, Spine.

[9]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Predictive Model for Cervical Alignment and Malalignment Following Surgical Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity , 2016, Spine.

[10]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Predictive modeling of complications , 2016, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

[11]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  A Comprehensive Review of Complication Rates After Surgery for Adult Deformity: A Reference for Informed Consent , 2015, Spine deformity.

[12]  L. Lenke,et al.  Risk Factors for and Assessment of Symptomatic Pseudarthrosis After Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Adult Spinal Deformity , 2014, Spine.

[13]  J. Chapman,et al.  Predicting medical complications after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[14]  Munish C. Gupta,et al.  Detection of Pseudarthrosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: The Use of Health-related Quality-of-life Outcomes to Predict Pseudarthrosis , 2013, Clinical spine surgery.

[15]  M. Fehlings,et al.  A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: data from the prospective, multi-center AOSpine North America study. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  A. Valdevit,et al.  Predicting Operative Blood Loss During Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2013, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[17]  Y. Tsai,et al.  A predictive model for disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[18]  James D. Kang,et al.  Prediction of blood loss during surgery on the lumbar spine with the patient supported prone on the Jackson table. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[19]  Warren D. Yu,et al.  Pseudarthrosis of the Spine , 2009, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[20]  L. Lenke,et al.  Pseudarthrosis in Long Adult Spinal Deformity Instrumentation and Fusion to the Sacrum: Prevalence and Risk Factor Analysis of 144 Cases , 2006, Spine.

[21]  W. Skalli,et al.  Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[22]  L. Lenke,et al.  Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  L. Lenke,et al.  Pseudarthrosis in Primary Fusions for Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome Analysis , 2005, Spine.

[24]  J. Gold,et al.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  R. Betz,et al.  Results of in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. , 1992, Journal of spinal disorders.

[26]  H N Herkowitz,et al.  Pseudarthrosis of the spine. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  Dean Abbott,et al.  Applied Predictive Analytics: Principles and Techniques for the Professional Data Analyst , 2014 .

[28]  W. Skalli,et al.  [Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance]. , 2003, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.