Left ventricular ejection fraction using 64-slice CT coronary angiography and new evaluation software: initial experience.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of software-based quantification of left ventricular function using 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Data were collected from 26 subjects who underwent a 64-slice coronary CT angiography study. Two volumetric data sets at end diastole and end systole were reconstructed from each scan by means of retrospective electrocardiogram gating. Data sets were evaluated with a prototype of now commercially available software (Syngo Circulation I; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany), which automatically segments the blood volume in the left ventricle after the user defines the mitral valve plane and any point within the ventricle. After segmentation of the blood pool in end systole and end diastole, the software automatically measures end systolic and end diastolic volume and calculates stroke volume and ejection fraction (EF). Two readers processed all CT data sets twice to assess for intra- and inter-observer variation. In addition, CT EF measurements were compared with those obtained by clinical echocardiography. Intra-observer variation for the calculated EF with CT were 13.6% and 15.6% for Readers 1 and 2, respectively. No significant difference in left ventricular functional parameters on CT existed between the readers (p > 0.05). A Bland-Altman plot revealed a slight mean difference between EF measurements on CT and echocardiography, with all differences falling within two standard deviations of the mean in the setting of wide limits of agreement. In conclusion, assessment of left ventricular EF from CT coronary data using the new analysis software is rapid and easy. The software is user-friendly and provides good reproducibility for EF measurements with CT.

[1]  A de Roos,et al.  Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MR imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. , 1993, Radiology.

[2]  E Fleck,et al.  Comparison of magnetic resonance real-time imaging of left ventricular function with conventional magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  J Yoshikawa,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular function by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography compared with conventional noninvasive methods. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  I. Holme,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of biplane two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimensions and function. , 1997, European heart journal.

[5]  J. Debatin,et al.  Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[6]  A. Salustri,et al.  Left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with normal and distorted left ventricular shape by three-dimensional echocardiographic methods: a comparison with radionuclide angiography. , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[7]  I Schnittger,et al.  Reproducibility of left ventricular volumes by two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  G Germano,et al.  Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values. , 2000, Radiology.

[9]  C B Higgins,et al.  Which standard has the gold? , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Peter Hunold,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  Masashi Komeda,et al.  Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. , 2005, Radiology.

[13]  R Erbel,et al.  Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  W. Heindel,et al.  Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  W J Manning,et al.  Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography with unrestricted selection of imaging planes for measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. , 2000, American heart journal.

[16]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation , 2002, European Radiology.