Corneal inlays for presbyopia correction

Purpose of review This study provides an overview of the three types of corneal inlays now in use for the correction of presbyopia and reviews recently published evidence of the inlays’ safety and efficacy. Recent findings Results for corneal reshaping and refractive inlays are promising, but very limited. Small-aperture inlays are already in widespread use and have been shown to improve uncorrected near and intermediate vision without a significant loss in distance acuity or an unacceptable increase in visual symptoms. Complications have been minimal, but the inlays may be removed if necessary. They do not prevent visualization or imaging of the retina and may be retained during subsequent cataract surgery. Summary The presbyopic demographic is large and growing, with a high level of interest in spectacle independence. There is currently no other effective solutions for presbyopes who desire good uncorrected vision at all distances without the risks of intraocular surgery or the visual compromises of monovision. Additional research is needed, but the future for corneal inlay technology is bright.

[1]  Alan Lang,et al.  Clinical Performance of a Hydrogel Corneal Inlay in Hyperopic Presbyopes , 2012 .

[2]  Sophia I Panagopoulou,et al.  Visual outcomes and safety of a small diameter intrastromal refractive inlay for the corneal compensation of presbyopia. , 2012, Journal of refractive surgery.

[3]  D. Gatinel,et al.  Recentration of a small-aperture corneal inlay. , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  J. Tobias,et al.  Image defocus and altered retinal gene expression in chick: clues to the pathogenesis of ametropia. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  G. Kymionis,et al.  Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal pocket creation using a mask for inlay implantation. , 2011, Journal of refractive surgery.

[6]  Orang Seyeddain,et al.  Reading performance and patient satisfaction after corneal inlay implantation for presbyopia correction: Two‐year follow‐up , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Optical modeling of a corneal inlay in real eyes to increase depth of focus: Optimum centration and residual defocus , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  G. Grabner,et al.  One‐year visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after surgical correction of presbyopia with an intracorneal inlay of a new design , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  A. Demirok,et al.  Intracorneal inlay to correct presbyopia: Long‐term results , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  M. Santhiago,et al.  Short-term cell death and inflammation after intracorneal inlay implantation in rabbits. , 2012, Journal of refractive surgery.

[11]  Jorge L Alió,et al.  Retinal imaging after corneal inlay implantation. , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  Sotiris Plainis,et al.  Visual outcomes and safety of a refractive corneal inlay for presbyopia using femtosecond laser. , 2013, Journal of refractive surgery.

[13]  Orang Seyeddain,et al.  Reading performance after implantation of a modified corneal inlay design for the surgical correction of presbyopia: 1-year follow-up. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Orang Seyeddain,et al.  Small‐aperture corneal inlay for the correction of presbyopia: 3‐year follow‐up , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  T. Tsuru,et al.  Simultaneous corneal inlay implantation and laser in situ keratomileusis for presbyopia in patients with hyperopia, myopia, or emmetropia: Six‐month results , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.