Utility and framing

Standard principles of rational decision assume that an option’s utility is both comprehensive and accessible. These features constrain interpretations of an option’s utility. This essay presents a way of understanding utility and laws of utility. It explains the relation between an option’s utility and its outcome’s utility and argues that an option’s utility is relative to a specification of the option. Utility’s relativity explains how a decision problem’s framing affects an option’s utility and its rationality even for an agent who is cognitively perfect and lacks only empirical information. The essay rewrites standard laws of utility to accommodate relativization to propositions’ specifications. The new laws are generalizations of the standard laws and yield them as special cases.

[1]  J. Lerner,et al.  inuences on judgement and choice , 2000 .

[2]  David J. Chalmers,et al.  The Components of Content , 1994 .

[3]  Martin Peterson,et al.  Transformative Decision Rules : Foundations and Applications , 2003 .

[4]  F. Schick.  Ambiguity and Logic , 2003 .

[5]  Michael Bacharach,et al.  Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and Frames in Game Theory , 2006 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[7]  P. Ludlow,et al.  Talk About Beliefs. , 1992 .

[8]  Raymond Dacey.  Taking Chances: Essays on Rational Choice , 1996 .

[9]  Andrew Chiu,et al.  Prospect Theory , 2018, Encyclopedia of Wireless Networks.

[10]  Van Fraassen,et al.  The Empirical Stance , 2002 .

[11]  J. Lerner,et al.  Fear, anger, and risk. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[13]  D. Chalmers.  Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings , 2021 .

[14]  A. Rubinstein.  Modeling Bounded Rationality , 1998 .

[15]  Paul Weirich,et al.  Probabilities in Decision Rules , 2010 .

[16]  Craig R. Fox,et al.  Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance , 1995 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[18]  T. Horgan.  The Two-Envelope Paradox, Nonstandard Expected Utility, and the Intensionality of Probability , 2000 .

[19]  D. Lewis.  Attitudes De Dicto and De Se , 1979 .

[20]  Paul Weirich,et al.  Realistic Decision Theory: Rules for Nonideal Agents in Nonideal Circumstances , 2004 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Psychology of Preferences , 1982 .

[24]  James H. Fetzer,et al.  The Place of Probability in Science , 2010 .

[25]  Paul Weirich,et al.  Decision Space: Multidimensional Utility Analysis , 2001 .

[26]  R. Dacey,et al.  A Detailed Prospect Theory Explanation of the Disposition Effect , 2008 .