How to Make a 29% Increase Look Bigger: The Unit Effect in Option Comparisons
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] I. Erev,et al. On the Descriptive Value of Loss Aversion in Decisions under Risk: Six Clarifications , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.
[2] S. Dehaene,et al. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .
[3] R. Bagchi,et al. Illusionary Progress in Loyalty Programs: Magnitudes, Reward Distances, and Step-Size Ambiguity , 2011 .
[4] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .
[5] A. Parducci. Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.
[6] Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al. Anchors aweigh: A demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming , 2008, Cognition.
[7] Norbert Schwarz,et al. Judgment in a Social Context: Biases, Shortcomings, and the Logic of Conversation , 1994 .
[8] Ritesh Saini,et al. The psychological underpinnings of relative thinking in price comparisons , 2010 .
[9] Preferences Scientific. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. , 1982 .
[10] Ellen E. Furlong,et al. Cognitive Constraints on How Economic Rewards Affect Cooperation , 2009, Psychological science.
[11] Kimihiko Yamagishi. When a 12.86% Mortality is More Dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for Risk Communication , 1997 .
[12] A. Tversky,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.
[13] S. Dehaene,et al. Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.
[14] Christopher P. Puto,et al. Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .
[15] Stanislas Dehaene,et al. The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[16] Kin Fai Ellick Wong,et al. Is 7300 m Equal to 7.3 km? Same Semantics but Different Anchoring Effects. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[17] Ana Sofia Morais,et al. Developing intuition for prices in euros: rescaling or relearning prices? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[18] Richard P. Larrick,et al. Six of One, Half Dozen of the Other , 2009, Psychological science.
[19] S Epstein,et al. Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: further evidence for two conceptual systems. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[20] Duane T. Wegener,et al. Elaboration and numerical anchoring: Implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making , 2010 .
[21] D. Ariely,et al. “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences , 2003 .
[22] L. Myaskovsky,et al. The Easy Path From Many To Much: the Numerosity Heuristic , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.
[23] Miranda R. Goode,et al. The Psychological Consequences of Money , 2006, Science.
[24] Christopher K. Hsee,et al. Specification Seeking: How Product Specifications Influence Consumer Preference , 2008 .
[25] D. Mackinnon. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2008 .
[26] Kin Fai Ellick Wong,et al. The role of ratio differences in the framing of numerical information , 2006 .
[27] Thomas Gilovich,et al. Incidental environmental anchors , 2008 .
[28] E. Miller,et al. Coding of Cognitive Magnitude Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.
[29] P. Raghubir,et al. Is 1/10 > 10/100? The effect of denominator salience on perceptions of base rates of health risk , 2008 .
[30] Joydeep Srivastava,et al. The Denomination Effect , 2009 .
[31] Yan Zhang,et al. Medium Maximization , 2003 .
[32] D. Soman,et al. Attribute Evaluability and the Range Effect , 2005 .
[33] Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al. Range and Number-of-Levels Effects in Derived and Stated Measures of Attribute Importance , 2002 .
[34] Christopher K. Hsee,et al. The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .
[35] Joydeep Srivastava,et al. Effect of Face Value on Product Valuation in Foreign Currencies , 2002 .
[36] S. Epstein,et al. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[37] C. K. Mertz,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .
[38] Daniel Read,et al. Four Score and Seven Years from Now: The Date/Delay Effect in Temporal Discounting , 2005, Manag. Sci..
[39] F. Strack,et al. Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .
[40] Duane T. Wegener,et al. Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: An attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring , 2008 .
[41] P. Wakker,et al. Prospect-theory’s Diminishing Sensitivity Versus Economics’ Intrinsic Utility of Money: How the Introduction of the Euro can be Used to Disentangle the Two Empirically , 2007 .
[42] Mario Pandelaere,et al. Are All Units Created Equal? The Effect of Default Units on Product Evaluations , 2013 .
[43] Timothy D. Wilson,et al. A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[44] T. Mussweiler,et al. Adapting to the Euro: Evidence from bias reduction , 2003 .
[45] A. Tversky,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .
[46] I. Simonson,et al. The Idiosyncratic Fit Heuristic: Effort Advantage as a Determinant of Consumer Response to Loyalty Programs , 2003 .
[47] Tobias Greitemeyer,et al. Psychological effects of the Euro - Experimental research on the perception of salaries and price estimations , 2002 .
[48] Charlotte Gaston-Breton. The impact of the euro on the consumer decision process: theoretical explanation and empirical evidence , 2006 .
[49] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .
[50] Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al. On the Perceived Value of Money: The Reference Dependence of Currency Numerosity Effects , 2007 .