Orientation discrimination depends on spatial frequency

Thresholds were measured for discriminating the orientation of sinusoidal gratings of varying spatial frequency, and found to decrease monotonically with increasing spatial frequency. For discrimination of high-contrast (10 times threshold) near-vertical gratings, thresholds ranged from about 1 deg at 0.04 c/deg to 0.5 deg at 0.2 c/deg, after which there was little improvement. At lower contrasts and for discriminations around a mean of 45 deg, thresholds varied more so, and continued to improve until 1 c/deg. The variation of orientation discrimination thresholds with spatial frequency follows a similar trend to the variation in orientation bandwidth of visual units over the same range of spatial frequencies. Thus the present results are consistent with recent "opponent-process" models of orientation discrimination, that predict that thresholds to be limited (at least in part) by the maximum slope of orientation selectivity of visual detectors. That thresholds for high contrast vertical gratings did not improve for frequencies higher than 0.2 c/deg implies that orientation bandwidth and noisiness of oriented detectors may not be the sole factor limiting orientation discrimination, and suggests the existence of more central noise sources.

[1]  D. P. Andrews Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea part I: Short lines , 1967 .

[2]  R. L. Valois,et al.  The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[3]  H. Wilson,et al.  Modified line-element theory for spatial-frequency and width discrimination. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  H. Wilson,et al.  Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial-frequency adaptation and grating discrimination: predictions of a line-element model. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  D Regan,et al.  Independence of orientation and size in spatial discriminations. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[9]  S P McKee,et al.  Interference with line-orientation sensitivity. , 1976, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  D. P. Andrews Perception of Contours in the Central Fovea , 1965, Nature.

[11]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Evidence for disparity detecting neurones in the human visual system , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  D. Regan,et al.  Periodicity in orientation discrimination and the unconfounding of visual information , 1986, Vision Research.

[13]  M C Morrone,et al.  Inhibitory interactions in the human vision system revealed in pattern‐evoked potentials. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  D. Burr,et al.  Selective depression of motion sensitivity during saccades. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  D. Regan,et al.  Postadaptation orientation discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatial and temporal selectivity of the human motion detection system , 1985, Vision Research.

[18]  S. F. Bowne Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency discrimination , 1990, Vision Research.