Walking Aids for Enabling Activity and Participation: A Systematic Review

Abstract In this systematic literature review, we examined whether and how walking aids (i.e., canes, crutches, walkers, and rollators) enable activity and participation among adults with physical disabilities. Medline, Embase, all EBM reviews, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were used to identify studies published since 2008. Quantitative and qualitative designs were included. Data regarding participants, assistive device use, outcome measures, and domains of participation were extracted. Two reviewers independently rated the level of evidence and methodological quality of the studies. Outcomes were categorized per types of walking aids and activity and participation domains. Thirteen studies were included. Two studies involved canes, four pertained to rollators, and seven dealt with multiple types of walking aids. Mobility was the most frequently examined domain of activity and participation. Both negative and positive results were found. Negative outcomes were linked to the physical characteristics of the device, the use, environment, and personal reluctance. When incorporated in daily life, walking aids were found to enable several domains of activity and participation. Whether walking aids facilitate activity and participation may depend on the user's ability to overcome obstacles and integrate them in daily life. More high-quality research is needed to draw conclusions about their effectiveness.

[1]  A. Schnider,et al.  Effect of different walking aids on walking capacity of patients with poststroke hemiparesis. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  M. Cardol,et al.  When work and satisfaction with life do not go hand in hand: health barriers and personal resources in the participation of people with chronic physical disabilities. , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[3]  Daniel Fok,et al.  Evaluating use and outcomes of mobility technology: A multiple stakeholder analysis , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[4]  James S. Krause,et al.  Association between reliance on devices and people for walking and ability to walk community distances among persons with spinal cord injury , 2012, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[5]  P. London.  Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[6]  M. Rijken,et al.  Participation of people with physical disabilities: three-year trend and potential for improvement. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Tülay Fertelli,et al.  Mobility disability and life satisfaction in elderly people. , 2010, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[8]  A. Hachisuka,et al.  Peripheral Neuropathies in Nonparetic Upper Extremities of Stroke Patients Induced by Excessive Use of a Walking Device. , 2015, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[9]  S. Tomsone,et al.  Experiences of mobility device use over time: A multiple case study among very old Latvian women , 2016, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[10]  Helene Brännström,et al.  Walking on the edge: meanings of living in an ageing body and using a walker in everyday life - a phenomenological hermeneutic study. , 2013, International journal of older people nursing.

[11]  Kushang V Patel,et al.  Mobility Device Use in Older Adults and Incidence of Falls and Worry About Falling: Findings from the 2011–2012 National Health and Aging Trends Study , 2015, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  Maria Larsson Lund,et al.  Perceived participation in life situations in persons with late effects of polio. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  M. Shields,et al.  Use of wheelchairs and other mobility support devices. , 2004, Health reports.

[14]  M. Sertel,et al.  Assistive Device Usage in Elderly People and Evaluation of Mobility Level , 2012 .

[15]  Alenoush Saroyan,et al.  Evidence-Based Practice Behaviours: A Comparison amongst Occupational Therapy Students and Clinicians , 2012, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[16]  L. Nygård,et al.  Perceptions of participation and predictors of perceived problems with participation in persons with spinal cord injury. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  Three very old men's experiences of mobility device use over time , 2013, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[18]  Å. Brandt,et al.  Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[19]  D. Connelly,et al.  The Impact and Use of Walkers among Older Adults: A Pilot , 2008 .

[20]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Experiences among older persons using mobility devices , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[21]  J. Jutai,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[22]  Ewa Wressle,et al.  User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: An important element in the rehabilitation process , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[23]  M. Kearney.  Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence. , 2001, Research in nursing & health.

[24]  K. Samuelsson,et al.  User Satisfaction with Mobility Assistive Devices , 2004 .

[25]  J. Jutai,et al.  How Assistive Technology Use by Individuals with Disabilities Impacts Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review of the Research Evidence , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[26]  S. Amatachaya,et al.  Ambulatory assistive devices and walking performance in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury , 2013, Spinal Cord.

[27]  Lisa I. Iezzoni,et al.  Perspectives on use of mobility aids in a diverse population of seniors: implications for intervention. , 2009, Disability and health journal.

[28]  K. Tham,et al.  Perceived participation and autonomy: aspects of functioning and contextual factors predicting participation after stroke. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[29]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Very old Swedish women's experiences of mobility devices in everyday occupation: A longitudinal case study , 2009, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[31]  K. Berg,et al.  Receiving help at home: the interplay of human and technological assistance. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.