Assessing direction-specific adaptation using the steady-state visual evoked potential: results from EEG source imaging.

Studying directional selectivity using neuroimaging in humans is difficult because the resolution is insufficient to directly access directionally selective activity. Here we used motion adaptation of the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) and source imaging in the frequency domain to detect brain areas that contain direction-selective cells. This study uses a definitive electrophysiological marker for direction-specific adaptation in the SSVEP to localize cortical areas that are direction selective. It has been shown previously that an oscillating stimulus produces an SSVEP response that is dominated by even harmonics of the stimulus frequency. This pattern of response is consistent with equal population responses to each direction of motion. Prolonged exposure to unidirectional motion induces an asymmetry in the population response that is consistent with adaptation of direction-selective cells. This asymmetry manifests itself in the presence of odd harmonic components after adaptation Critically, the feature that indicates the direction used for adaptation is the phase of the odd-harmonic responses. We recorded this signature of direction selectivity in a group of observers whose retinotopic visual areas had been defined from fMRI mapping. We find direction-specific responses throughout retinotopic cortex, with the largest effect in areas V1 (occipital pole) and V3/V3a (dorsal).

[1]  D. Levi,et al.  Direction selectivity for perceived motion in strabismic and anisometropoic amblyopia. , 1980, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  H. Ashida,et al.  FMRI adaptation reveals separate mechanisms for first-order and second-order motion. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Predominantly extra-retinotopic cortical response to pattern symmetry , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Ian E Holliday,et al.  Optic flow in human vision: MEG reveals a foveo-fugal bias in V1, specialization for spiral space in hMSTs, and global motion sensitivity in the IPS. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[6]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Fermaglich Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[8]  文堂 昌彦 Human Visual Motion Areas Determined Individually by Magnetoencephalography and 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000 .

[9]  J. Movshon,et al.  Neuronal Adaptation to Visual Motion in Area MT of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[10]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Opposite dependencies on visual motion coherence in human area MT+ and early visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual System , 1997, Vision Research.

[14]  Tsunehiro Takeda,et al.  Direction-specific adaptation of magnetic responses to motion onset , 2005, Vision Research.

[15]  Michael Bach,et al.  Adaptation characteristics of steady-state motion visual evoked potentials , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Aftereffect of Seen Motion with a Stabilized Retinal Image , 1963, Science.

[17]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Visual field maps and stimulus selectivity in human ventral occipital cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Chantal Delon-Martin,et al.  Temporal pattern of source activities evoked by different types of motion onset stimuli , 2006, NeuroImage.

[19]  H Spekreijse,et al.  Temporal and spatial congruence of components of motion-onset evoked responses investigated by whole-head magneto-electroencephalography , 2004, Vision Research.

[20]  中村 元 Human V5 demonstrated by magnetoencephalography using random dot kinematograms of different coherence levels , 2006 .

[21]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Pattern-motion responses in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Blake,et al.  Interocular Transfer of Expansion, Rotation, and Translation Motion Aftereffects , 1994, Perception.

[23]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[24]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[25]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Receptive field properties of neurons in area V3 of macaque monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  J. Victor,et al.  A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Cue-Invariant Networks for Figure and Background Processing in Human Visual Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  G. Orban,et al.  Velocity sensitivity and direction selectivity of neurons in areas V1 and V2 of the monkey: influence of eccentricity. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Neuroimaging of direction-selective mechanisms for second-order motion. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  C. Tyler,et al.  Movement adaptation in the visual evoked response , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[32]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[33]  E. R. Cohen,et al.  Close correlation between activity in brain area MT/V5 and the perception of a visual motion aftereffect , 1998, Current Biology.

[34]  R. Tootell,et al.  Where is 'dorsal V4' in human visual cortex? Retinotopic, topographic and functional evidence. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[36]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  From Neuron to Brain: A Cellular and Molecular Approach to the Function of the Nervous System , 1992 .

[37]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Magnetic response of human extrastriate cortex in the detection of coherent and incoherent motion , 2000, Neuroscience.

[38]  Peter A. Tass,et al.  Timing of V1/V2 and V5+ activations during coherent motion of dots: An MEG study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[39]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Functional measurements of human ventral occipital cortex: retinotopy and colour. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[40]  W. Paulus,et al.  Identification of the visual motion area (area V5) in the human brain by dipole source analysis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  fMRI and its interpretations: an illustration on directional selectivity in area V5/MT , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[42]  Lauri Parkkonen,et al.  Motion sensitivity of human V6: A magnetoencephalography study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[43]  Michael Bach,et al.  Directional tuning of human motion adaptation as reflected by the motion VEP , 2001, Vision Research.

[44]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[45]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.