Isoform-level microRNA-155 target prediction using RNA-seq

Computational prediction of microRNA targets remains a challenging problem. The existing rule-based, data-driven and expression profiling approaches to target prediction are mostly approached from the gene-level. The increasing availability of RNA-seq data provides a new perspective for microRNA target prediction on the isoform-level. We hypothesize that the splicing isoform is the ultimate effector in microRNA targeting and that the proposed isoform-level approach is capable of predicting non-dominant isoform targets as well as their targeting regions that are otherwise invisible to many existing approaches. To test the hypothesis, we used an iterative expectation maximization (EM) algorithm to quantify transcriptomes at the isoform-level. The performance of the EM algorithm in transcriptome quantification was examined in simulation studies using FluxSimulator. We used joint evidence from isoform-level down-regulation and seed enrichment to predict microRNA-155 targets. We validated our computational approach using results from 149 in-house performed in vitro 3′-UTR assays. We also augmented the splicing database using exon–exon junction evidence, and applied the EM algorithm to predict and quantify 1572 cell line specific novel isoforms. Combined with seed enrichment analysis, we predicted 51 novel microRNA-155 isoform targets. Our work is among the first computational studies advocating the isoform-level microRNA target prediction.

[1]  Guorong Xu,et al.  SAMMate: a GUI tool for processing short read alignments in SAM/BAM format , 2011, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

[2]  D. Zhu,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative RNA-Seq-Based Evaluation of Epstein-Barr Virus Transcription in Type I Latency Burkitt's Lymphoma Cells , 2010, Journal of Virology.

[3]  Nan Deng,et al.  Transcriptome and targetome analysis in MIR155 expressing cells using RNA-seq. , 2010, RNA.

[4]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  rQuant.web: a tool for RNA-Seq-based transcript quantitation , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  J. Rinn,et al.  Ab initio reconstruction of transcriptomes of pluripotent and lineage committed cells reveals gene structures of thousands of lincRNAs , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. , 2010, Nature biotechnology.

[7]  E. Flemington,et al.  MicroRNA miR-155 Inhibits Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) Signaling and BMP-Mediated Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation , 2010, Journal of Virology.

[8]  Marcel H. Schulz,et al.  Prediction of alternative isoforms from exon expression levels in RNA-Seq experiments , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  RNA-Seq gene expression estimation with read mapping uncertainty , 2009, Bioinform..

[10]  Yufei Huang,et al.  Survey of Computational Algorithms for MicroRNA Target Prediction , 2009, Current genomics.

[11]  Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay,et al.  TargetMiner: microRNA target prediction with systematic identification of tissue-specific negative examples , 2009, Bioinform..

[12]  Brian D Athey,et al.  New class of microRNA targets containing simultaneous 5'-UTR and 3'-UTR interaction sites. , 2009, Genome research.

[13]  Nectarios Koziris,et al.  DIANA-microT web server: elucidating microRNA functions through target prediction , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  Wing Hung Wong,et al.  Statistical inferences for isoform expression in RNA-Seq , 2009, Bioinform..

[15]  Lior Pachter,et al.  Sequence Analysis , 2020, Definitions.

[16]  Martin M Matzuk,et al.  A bioinformatics tool for linking gene expression profiling results with public databases of microRNA target predictions. , 2008, RNA.

[17]  P. Sharp,et al.  Proliferating Cells Express mRNAs with Shortened 3' Untranslated Regions and Fewer MicroRNA Target Sites , 2008, Science.

[18]  M. Lacey,et al.  MicroRNA-155 Is an Epstein-Barr Virus-Induced Gene That Modulates Epstein-Barr Virus-Regulated Gene Expression Pathways , 2008, Journal of Virology.

[19]  Stijn van Dongen,et al.  miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Bryan R. Cullen,et al.  A viral microRNA functions as an orthologue of cellular miR-155 , 2007, Nature.

[21]  B. Frey,et al.  Using expression profiling data to identify human microRNA targets , 2007, Nature Methods.

[22]  Louise C. Showe,et al.  Naïve Bayes for microRNA target predictions - machine learning for microRNA targets , 2007, Bioinform..

[23]  Alberto Riva,et al.  Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Encodes an Ortholog of miR-155 , 2007, Journal of Virology.

[24]  J. Steitz,et al.  Target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by microRNA-binding sites in the 5′ UTR as in the 3′ UTR , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Yi Xing,et al.  An expectation-maximization algorithm for probabilistic reconstructions of full-length isoforms from splice graphs , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  N. Rajewsky microRNA target predictions in animals , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[27]  Xiaowei Wang,et al.  Systematic identification of microRNA functions by combining target prediction and expression profiling , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  Byoung-Tak Zhang,et al.  miTarget: microRNA target gene prediction using a support vector machine , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[29]  K. Gunsalus,et al.  Combinatorial microRNA target predictions , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[30]  J. Castle,et al.  Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs , 2005, Nature.

[31]  C. Burge,et al.  Conserved Seed Pairing, Often Flanked by Adenosines, Indicates that Thousands of Human Genes are MicroRNA Targets , 2005, Cell.

[32]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  MicroRNA targets in Drosophila , 2003, Genome Biology.

[33]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.