Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness

Cell migration plays a major role in many fundamental biological processes, such as morphogenesis, tumor metastasis, and wound healing. As they anchor and pull on their surroundings, adhering cells actively probe the stiffness of their environment. Current understanding is that traction forces exerted by cells arise mainly at mechanotransduction sites, called focal adhesions, whose size seems to be correlated to the force exerted by cells on their underlying substrate, at least during their initial stages. In fact, our data show by direct measurements that the buildup of traction forces is faster for larger substrate stiffness, and that the stress measured at adhesion sites depends on substrate rigidity. Our results, backed by a phenomenological model based on active gel theory, suggest that rigidity-sensing is mediated by a large-scale mechanism originating in the cytoskeleton instead of a local one. We show that large-scale mechanosensing leads to an adaptative response of cell migration to stiffness gradients. In response to a step boundary in rigidity, we observe not only that cells migrate preferentially toward stiffer substrates, but also that this response is optimal in a narrow range of rigidities. Taken together, these findings lead to unique insights into the regulation of cell response to external mechanical cues and provide evidence for a cytoskeleton-based rigidity-sensing mechanism.

[1]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions , 2008 .

[3]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  P. Hersen,et al.  Strength dependence of cadherin-mediated adhesions. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[5]  S. Safran,et al.  Do cells sense stress or strain? Measurement of cellular orientation can provide a clue. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells , 2008, Nature.

[7]  Jeffrey J. Fredberg,et al.  Reinforcement versus Fluidization in Cytoskeletal Mechanoresponsiveness , 2009, PloS one.

[8]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  Kimihide Hayakawa,et al.  Actin stress fibers transmit and focus force to activate mechanosensitive channels , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[10]  Ian Charles Sage,et al.  Liquid Crystal Elastomers , 2003 .

[11]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.

[12]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  P. A. Dimilla,et al.  Vascular smooth muscle cell durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[15]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  Patrick W Oakes,et al.  Spatiotemporal constraints on the force-dependent growth of focal adhesions. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  A. Besser,et al.  Dynamics of cellular focal adhesions on deformable substrates: consequences for cell force microscopy. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[19]  S. Safran,et al.  Limitation of cell adhesion by the elasticity of the extracellular matrix. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Michael W. Davidson,et al.  Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions , 2010, Nature.

[21]  D. Navajas,et al.  Viscoelasticity of human alveolar epithelial cells subjected to stretch. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[22]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell mechanosensitivity controls the anisotropy of focal adhesions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  D. Discher,et al.  Optimal matrix rigidity for stress fiber polarization in stem cells. , 2010, Nature physics.

[25]  J. Joanny,et al.  Generic theory of active polar gels: a paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics , 2004, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[26]  Linhong Deng,et al.  Universal physical responses to stretch in the living cell , 2007, Nature.

[27]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[29]  M. Glogauer,et al.  Calcium ions and tyrosine phosphorylation interact coordinately with actin to regulate cytoprotective responses to stretching. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[30]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  A mechanical model of actin stress fiber formation and substrate elasticity sensing in adherent cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Walter Birchmeier,et al.  Stress fiber sarcomeres of fibroblasts are contractile , 1980, Cell.

[34]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.

[35]  Taekjip Ha,et al.  Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics , 2010, Nature.

[36]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[37]  M. Sokabe,et al.  Sensing substrate rigidity by mechanosensitive ion channels with stress fibers and focal adhesions. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[38]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[39]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[40]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[41]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Sarcomere mechanics in capillary endothelial cells. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Tai-De Li,et al.  Mechanics and contraction dynamics of single platelets and implications for clot stiffening. , 2011, Nature materials.

[43]  Tom Shemesh,et al.  Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: a physical mechanism. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  J. Joanny,et al.  Generic phase diagram of active polar films. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[45]  D A Weitz,et al.  Filamin A is essential for active cell stiffening but not passive stiffening under external force. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[46]  E. M. Terentjev,et al.  Liquid Crystal Elastomers , 2003 .

[47]  R. Austin,et al.  Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  J. Simeon,et al.  Creep function of a single living cell. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[49]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[50]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .