Cortical auditory evoked potentials as an objective measure of behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users

The aim of this study was to assess the suitability of using cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) as an objective tool for predicting behavioral hearing thresholds in cochlear implant (CI) users. Nine experienced adult CI users of Cochlear(™) devices participated. Behavioral thresholds were measured in CI users across apical, mid and basal electrodes. CAEPs were measured for the same stimuli (50 ms pulse trains of 900-pps rate) at a range of input levels across the individual's psychophysical dynamic range (DR). Amplitude growth functions using global field power (GFP) were plotted, and from this the CAEP thresholds were extrapolated and compared to the behavioral thresholds. Increased amplitude and decreased latency of the N1-P2 response was seen with increasing input level. A strong correlation was found between CAEP and behavioral thresholds (r = 0.93), implying that the cortical response may be more useful as an objective programming tool for cochlear implants than the auditory nerve response.

[1]  M. Dorman,et al.  The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants , 2005, Hearing Research.

[2]  M. Dorman,et al.  Deprivation-induced cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants , 2007, International journal of audiology.

[3]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Comparison of EAP Thresholds with MAP Levels in the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant: Data from Children , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Mridula Sharma,et al.  Effect of interstimulus interval and age on cortical auditory evoked potentials in 10–22-week-old infants , 2014, Neuroreport.

[5]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Neurophysiology of Cochlear Implant Users I: Effects of Stimulus Current Level and Electrode Site on the Electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 Response , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[7]  P J Abbas,et al.  The Relationship Between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from Adults , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[8]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear implant artifact attenuation in late auditory evoked potentials: A single channel approach , 2013, Hearing Research.

[9]  Colette M. McKay,et al.  Can ECAP Measures Be Used for Totally Objective Programming of Cochlear Implants? , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[10]  M. Dorman,et al.  A Sensitive Period for the Development of the Central Auditory System in Children with Cochlear Implants: Implications for Age of Implantation , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[11]  Suzanne C. Purdy,et al.  Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  Evaluation of cochlear implant benefit with auditory cortical evoked potentials: Evaluación de los beneficios del implante coclear por medio de potenciales evocados auditivos corticales , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[13]  Colette M McKay,et al.  A Different Approach to Using Neural Response Telemetry for Automated Cochlear Implant Processor Programming , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[14]  C. G. Matas,et al.  Auditory pathways’ maturation after cochlear implant via cortical auditory evoked potentials , , 2014, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[15]  A. Snik,et al.  Discrimination of speech sound contrasts determined with behavioral tests and event-related potentials in cochlear implant recipients. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[16]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  Removal of eye movement artefacts from single channel recordings of retinal evoked potentials using synchronous dynamical embedding and independent component analysis , 2006, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[17]  S. Purdy,et al.  Stimulus level effects on speech-evoked obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials in infants with normal hearing , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  B. Maassen,et al.  The maturation of auditory cortical evoked responses between (preterm) birth and 14 years of age. , 1999, European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society.

[19]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[20]  J. Bohorquez,et al.  Intraoperative monitoring of hearing during cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery using transtympanic electrocochleography. , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[21]  G. Lightfoot,et al.  Cortical Electric Response Audiometry Hearing Threshold Estimation: Accuracy, Speed, and the Effects of Stimulus Presentation Features , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[22]  Development of P1 cortical auditory evoked potential in children presented with sensorineural hearing loss following cochlear implantation: a longitudinal study. , 2013, CoDAS.

[23]  B. Cone,et al.  Dynamics of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) for tone and speech tokens. , 2013, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.