Model based foot shape classification using 2D foot outlines

This study introduces a novel technique to identify foot outline characteristics and to classify feet into groups using turning functions and clustering techniques so that shape can complement anthropometry in producing good fitting shoes. The digital 3D foot scans, obtained from 50 Hong Kong Chinese subjects (25 males and 25 females) were processed to generate the foot outlines at heights of 2 mm and 40 mm. The outlines were represented as turning functions and the similarity among shapes was determined using average linkage clustering. The results show that there are two distinct shape groups for the 40 mm foot outlines on both medial and lateral sides of the foot. The presence (46%) or absence (54%) of a medial bulge characterizes the medial side, while the two shape groups on the lateral side are mainly due to the lateral concavity in the mid-foot region. The group with a lateral concavity consists of more females (68%) and thus lateral side of foot outline appears to be gender related. Furthermore, the medial and lateral side clusters are not related to each other. The medial side shape from the 2 mm foot outline is a good indicator of fallen arches. Based on the analyses, four types of feet were identified: feet with (1) lateral concavity and a medial bulge, (2) a medial bulge and no lateral concavity, (3) lateral concavity and no medial bulge and (4) lateral concavity and a medial bulge. These shape differences can be useful in the design of shoe lasts and in the manufacture of compatible footwear so that trial and error fitting can be minimized.

[1]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke,et al.  Designing for Comfort: A Footwear Application , 2001 .

[2]  Sa’Ed M. Salhieh,et al.  A methodology to redesign heterogeneous product portfolios as homogeneous product families , 2007, Comput. Aided Des..

[3]  Po-Whei Huang,et al.  Planar shape recognition by directional flow-change method , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[4]  S Braun,et al.  [The contour of the normal foot. A statistical study]. , 1980, Revue du rhumatisme et des maladies osteo-articulaires.

[5]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke,et al.  A scale model for fitting object shapes from fixed location data , 2004 .

[6]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships , 1958 .

[7]  Ali S. Hadi,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Chster Analysis , 1991 .

[8]  Ying Kwong Tang.  Foot shape prediction from digital images , 2007 .

[9]  Foot shape and shoe fitting comfort for elderly Japanese women , 2001 .

[10]  Y. Yoshihuku,et al.  Ethnic differences in forefoot shape and the determination of shoe comfort. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[11]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke,et al.  The Quality of Footwear Fit: What we know, don't know and should know , 2000 .

[12]  Filson H. Glanz,et al.  An Autoregressive Model Approach to Two-Dimensional Shape Classification , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Mohsen Razeghi,et al.  Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[14]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Structure-oriented contour representation and matching for engineering shapes , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[15]  M Mochimaru,et al.  Analysis of 3-D human foot forms using the Free Form Deformation method and its application in grading shoe lasts , 2000, Ergonomics.

[16]  Michael David Walsh,et al.  Hong Kong 2001 , 2001 .

[17]  D. Ross.  Computer-aided design , 1961, CACM.

[18]  S.R. Urry,et al.  The accuracy of footprint contact area measurements: relevance to the design and performance of pressure platforms , 2001 .

[19]  Esther M. Arkin,et al.  An efficiently computable metric for comparing polygonal shapes , 1991, SODA '90.

[20]  Dusan Cakmakov,et al.  ESTIMATION OF CURVE SIMILARITY USING TURNING FUNCTIONS , 2004 .

[21]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Gender differences in adult foot shape: implications for shoe design. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  Tae Jin Hwang,et al.  Derivation of template shoe-lasts for efficient fabrication of custom-ordered shoe-lasts , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[23]  Heinz Hügli,et al.  Fast ICP Algorithms for Shape Registration , 2002, DAGM-Symposium.

[24]  M S Rathleff,et al.  Perspectives for clinical measures of dynamic foot function-reference data and methodological considerations. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[25]  M Kouchi.  Analysis of foot shape variation based on the medial axis of foot outline. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[26]  Der-Baau Perng,et al.  A systematic approach for developing a foot size information system for shoe last design , 2000 .

[27]  Erin Shubel,et al.  Relative Lengths of Fingers and Toes in Human Males and Females , 2002, Hormones and Behavior.

[28]  Micha Sharir,et al.  Identification of Partially Obscured Objects in Two and Three Dimensions by Matching Noisy Characteristic Curves , 1987 .

[29]  Michael S. Lew,et al.  Principles of Visual Information Retrieval , 2001, Advances in Pattern Recognition.

[30]  Channa P. Witana,et al.  Foot arch characterization: a review, a new metric, and a comparison. , 2010, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[31]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Jing Fu,et al.  Shape differentiation of freeform surfaces using a similarity measure based on an integral of Gaussian curvature , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[33]  Ameersing Luximon,et al.  3D foot shape generation from 2D information , 2005, Ergonomics.

[34]  Horea T. Ilies,et al.  Distance functions and skeletal representations of rigid and non-rigid planar shapes , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[35]  Owen Robert Mitchell,et al.  Partial Shape Recognition Using Dynamic Programming , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[36]  B M Nigg,et al.  Shoe inserts and orthotics for sport and physical activities. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[37]  Channa P. Witana,et al.  Dimensional differences for evaluating the quality of footwear fit , 2004, Ergonomics.