Mechanisms of electrical coupling between pyramidal cells.

Direct electrical coupling between neurons can be the result of both electrotonic current transfer through gap junctions and extracellular fields. Intracellular recordings from CA1 pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampal slices showed two different types of small-amplitude coupling potentials: short-duration (5 ms) biphasic spikelets, which resembled differentiated action potentials and long-duration (>20 ms) monophasic potentials. A three-dimensional morphological model of a pyramidal cell was employed to determine the extracellular field produced by a neuron and its effect on a nearby neuron resulting from both gap junctional and electric field coupling. Computations were performed with a novel formulation of the boundary element method that employs triangular elements to discretize the soma and cylindrical elements to discretize the dendrites. An analytic formula was derived to aid in computations involving cylindrical elements. Simulation results were compared with biological recordings of intracellular potentials and spikelets. Field effects produced waveforms resembling spikelets although of smaller magnitude than those recorded in vitro. Gap junctional electrotonic connections produced waveforms resembling small-amplitude excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Intracellular electrode measurements were found inadequate for ascertaining membrane events because of externally applied electric fields. The transmembrane voltage induced by the electric field was highly spatially dependent in polarity and wave shape, as well as being an order of magnitude larger than activity measured at the electrode. Membrane voltages because of electrotonic current injection across gap junctions were essentially constant over the cell and were accurately depicted by the electrode. The effects of several parameters were investigated: 1) decreasing the ratio of intra to extracellular conductivity reduced the field effects; 2) the tree structure had a major impact on the intracellular potential; 3) placing the gap junction in the dendrites introduced a time delay in the gap junctional mediated electrotonic potential, as well as deceasing the potential recorded by the somatic electrode; and 4) field effects decayed to one-half of their maximum strength at a cell separation of approximately 20 micron. Results indicate that the in vitro measured spikelets are unlikely to be mediated by gap junctions and that a spikelet produced by the electric field of a single source cell has the same waveshape as the measured spikelet but with a much smaller amplitude. It is hypothesized that spikelets are a manifestation of the simultaneous electric field effects from several local cells whose action potential firing is synchronized.

[1]  W Rall,et al.  Computed potentials of cortically arranged populations of neurons. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  B Sakmann,et al.  Detailed passive cable models of whole-cell recorded CA3 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Zucker Field Potentials Generated by Dendritic Spikes and Synaptic Potentials , 1969, Science.

[4]  W. Rall Distinguishing theoretical synaptic potentials computed for different soma-dendritic distributions of synaptic input. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  L.J. Leon,et al.  A model study of electric field interactions between cardiac myocytes , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  T. Valiante,et al.  White noise approach for estimating the passive electrical properties of neurons. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Lai Wan Woo,et al.  Introduction to Finite and Boundary Element Methods for Engineers , 1995 .

[8]  Susan Dumps,et al.  A model study. , 1988, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[9]  Alan C. Hindmarsh,et al.  Description and use of LSODE, the Livermore Solver for Ordinary Differential Equations , 1993 .

[10]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Active propagation of somatic action potentials into neocortical pyramidal cell dendrites , 1994, Nature.

[11]  T. Valiante,et al.  Coupling potentials in CA1 neurons during calcium-free-induced field burst activity , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Lerma,et al.  Characteristics of CA1 activation through the hippocampal trisynaptic pathway in the unanaesthetized rat , 1987, Brain Research.

[13]  K G Baimbridge,et al.  Exposure to high-pH medium increases the incidence and extent of dye coupling between rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in vitro , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  Gernot Beer,et al.  Introduction to Finite and Boundary Element Methods for Engineers , 1993 .

[15]  Y Yarom,et al.  Physiology, morphology and detailed passive models of guinea‐pig cerebellar Purkinje cells. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  P. Carlen,et al.  Modulation of gap junctional mechanisms during calcium-free induced field burst activity: a possible role for electrotonic coupling in epileptogenesis , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  D. Spray,et al.  Gap junctions in the brain: where, what type, how many and why? , 1993, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  L.J. Leon,et al.  A model study of extracellular stimulation of cardiac cells , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Berj L. Bardakjian,et al.  Electric Coupling in Epileptogenesis , 1996 .

[20]  F. Dudek,et al.  Electrotonic coupling between pyramidal cells: a direct demonstration in rat hippocampal slices. , 1981, Science.

[21]  W. Rall Distributions of potential in cylindrical coordinates and time constants for a membrane cylinder. , 1969, Biophysical journal.

[22]  Effects of the propagation velocity of a surface depolarization wave on the extracellular potential of an excitable cell , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  B. Bardakjian,et al.  The effect of morphological interdigitation on field coupling between smooth muscle cells , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  B W Connors,et al.  Coupling between neurons of the developing rat neocortex , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Rook,et al.  Gap junction channels: distinct voltage-sensitive and -insensitive conductance states. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[26]  F. Dudek,et al.  Role of electrical interactions in synchronization of epileptiform bursts. , 1986, Advances in neurology.

[27]  W. Rall Electrophysiology of a dendritic neuron model. , 1962, Biophysical journal.

[28]  F. Dudek,et al.  A physiological test for electrotonic coupling between CA1 pyramidal cells in rat hippocampal slices , 1982, Brain Research.