Spatial resolution dependence on spectral frequency in human speech cortex electrocorticography

OBJECTIVE Electrocorticography (ECoG) has become an important tool in human neuroscience and has tremendous potential for emerging applications in neural interface technology. Electrode array design parameters are outstanding issues for both research and clinical applications, and these parameters depend critically on the nature of the neural signals to be recorded. Here, we investigate the functional spatial resolution of neural signals recorded at the human cortical surface. We empirically derive spatial spread functions to quantify the shared neural activity for each frequency band of the electrocorticogram. APPROACH Five subjects with high-density (4 mm center-to-center spacing) ECoG grid implants participated in speech perception and production tasks while neural activity was recorded from the speech cortex, including superior temporal gyrus, precentral gyrus, and postcentral gyrus. The cortical surface field potential was decomposed into traditional EEG frequency bands. Signal similarity between electrode pairs for each frequency band was quantified using a Pearson correlation coefficient. MAIN RESULTS The correlation of neural activity between electrode pairs was inversely related to the distance between the electrodes; this relationship was used to quantify spatial falloff functions for cortical subdomains. As expected, lower frequencies remained correlated over larger distances than higher frequencies. However, both the envelope and phase of gamma and high gamma frequencies (30-150 Hz) are largely uncorrelated (<90%) at 4 mm, the smallest spacing of the high-density arrays. Thus, ECoG arrays smaller than 4 mm have significant promise for increasing signal resolution at high frequencies, whereas less additional gain is achieved for lower frequencies. SIGNIFICANCE Our findings quantitatively demonstrate the dependence of ECoG spatial resolution on the neural frequency of interest. We demonstrate that this relationship is consistent across patients and across cortical areas during activity.

[1]  Spencer Kellis,et al.  Multi-scale analysis of neural activity in humans: Implications for micro-scale electrocorticography , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Jonathan G. Fiscus,et al.  Darpa Timit Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus CD-ROM {TIMIT} | NIST , 1993 .

[3]  B. Gordon,et al.  Induced electrocorticographic gamma activity during auditory perception , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  W. Freeman,et al.  Spatial spectral analysis of human electrocorticograms including the alpha and gamma bands , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  Brian Litt,et al.  Flexible, Foldable, Actively Multiplexed, High-Density Electrode Array for Mapping Brain Activity in vivo , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Bijan Pesaran Neural correlations, decisions, and actions , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  Warren M Grill,et al.  Analysis of deep brain stimulation electrode characteristics for neural recording , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Localization and classification of phonemes using high spatial resolution electrocorticography (ECoG) grids , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  M. Siegel,et al.  A framework for local cortical oscillation patterns , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  L. Miller,et al.  Optimal spacing of surface electrode arrays for brain–machine interface applications , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  R. Eckhorn,et al.  Amplitude envelope correlation detects coupling among incoherent brain signals , 2000, Neuroreport.

[12]  Jennifer L. Collinger,et al.  The impact of electrode characteristics on electrocorticography (ECoG) , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  M. Carandini,et al.  Local Origin of Field Potentials in Visual Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[14]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  NeuroGrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  W. Singer,et al.  The gamma cycle , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  The role of neuronal synchronization in selective attention , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Spectral Changes in Cortical Surface Potentials during Motor Movement , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Kristofer E. Bouchard,et al.  Functional Organization of Human Sensorimotor Cortex for Speech Articulation , 2013, Nature.

[19]  David T. Bundy,et al.  Microscale recording from human motor cortex: implications for minimally invasive electrocorticographic brain-computer interfaces. , 2009, Neurosurgical focus.

[20]  Carla Teixeira Lopes,et al.  TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus , 2012 .

[21]  D J Weber,et al.  Human motor cortical activity recorded with Micro-ECoG electrodes, during individual finger movements , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  M. Cohen,et al.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Theoretical analysis of intracortical microelectrode recordings , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  Bijan Pesaran,et al.  Uncovering the Mysterious Origins of Local Field Potentials , 2009, Neuron.

[25]  G. Elston Cortex, cognition and the cell: new insights into the pyramidal neuron and prefrontal function. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  N. Crone,et al.  Cortical γ responses: searching high and low. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[27]  Sonja Grün,et al.  How local is the local field potential? , 2011, BMC Neuroscience.

[28]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[29]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Spatiotemporal imaging of cortical activation during verb generation and picture naming , 2010, NeuroImage.

[30]  Bradley Greger,et al.  Decoding spoken words using local field potentials recorded from the cortical surface , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[31]  E. Niebur,et al.  Neural Correlates of High-Gamma Oscillations (60–200 Hz) in Macaque Local Field Potentials and Their Potential Implications in Electrocorticography , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Engel,et al.  Beta-band oscillations—signalling the status quo? , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  Zachary V Freudenburg,et al.  Decoding Motor Signals From the Pediatric Cortex: Implications for Brain-Computer Interfaces in Children , 2011, Pediatrics.

[34]  Erik Edwards,et al.  Comparison of time-frequency responses and the event-related potential to auditory speech stimuli in human cortex. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Spontaneous High-Gamma Band Activity Reflects Functional Organization of Auditory Cortex in the Awake Macaque , 2012, Neuron.

[36]  Gaute T. Einevoll,et al.  Frequency Dependence of Signal Power and Spatial Reach of the Local Field Potential , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  R. Shapley,et al.  Spatial Spread of the Local Field Potential and its Laminar Variation in Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  E. F. Chang,et al.  Sub-centimeter language organization in the human temporal lobe , 2011, Brain and Language.

[39]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Unrest at rest: Default activity and spontaneous network correlations , 2007, NeuroImage.

[40]  E. Halgren,et al.  High-frequency neural activity and human cognition: Past, present and possible future of intracranial EEG research , 2012, Progress in Neurobiology.

[41]  Spencer Kellis,et al.  Multi-scale analysis of neural activity in humans : implications for microscale electrocorticography , 2016 .