Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells.

Using SIRC (rabbit corneal cell line) cells, we developed an alternative eye irritation test: the short time exposure (STE) test. This STE test is a cytotoxicity test using physiological saline or mineral oil as the test solvent. Evaluation exposure time is short (5 min), which is similar to actual exposure situations, and uses the cell viability (CV) at a constant concentration as the endpoint for irritation potential. First, in order to confirm the usefulness of this STE test in assessing eye irritation potential of chemicals, 51 raw materials were tested and the correlation between CV in the STE test and the eye irritation score in the Draize test was examined. For the undiluted raw materials tested in the Draize test, the 5% test concentration in the STE test gave irritation classes that correlated well with the irritation classes from the Draize test (accuracy: 89.6%). For those materials tested as a 10% solution in the Draize test, STE irritation classes with 0.05% test concentration corresponded well with the Draize irritation classes (accuracy: 80.0%). Next, using the cell viabilities at these two concentrations, the STE prediction model (PM) was developed. A score of 1 or 2 was given for the results from each tested concentration in the STE test and Draize test. The scores from each test were then summed to yield a 3-level (Rank 1: minimally irritant, Rank 2: moderate irritant, Rank 3: severe irritant) eye irritation potential classification. Rank classification in the STE test showed a good correlation mostly to that in the Draize test (irritation class correspondence rate: 70.2%, but after exclusion of data of alcoholic materials, the rate was 91.7%). In most cytotoxicity test, the cytotoxicity of acids and amines is generally underestimated due the use of medium as the solvent. This is the result of the buffering capacity of the media. On the other hand, the STE test could predict the eye irritation potential by evaluating the chemical with a 5% test concentration. Eleven water insoluble materials such as toluene, octanol, and hexanol could be evaluated by using mineral oil as test solvent in the STE test. The STE test demonstrated itself to be simple, promising, have great potential, be of value, and to be an easily standardized alternative eye irritation test.

[1]  金子豊蔵 Importance of reevaluation on existing method in validation of alternative method-A case of Draize test- , 1996 .

[2]  J. Sina,et al.  Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test : an in vitro assay of ocular irritancy , 1992 .

[3]  A. Lagarto,et al.  Comparative study of red blood cell method in rat and calves blood as alternatives of Draize eye irritation test. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[4]  William C. McCormick,et al.  The SDA Alternatives Program Phase III: Comparison of in Vitro Data with Animal Eye Irritation Data on Solvents, Surfactants, Oxidizing Agents, and Prototype Cleaning Products , 1994 .

[5]  F. Planas-Bohne,et al.  The excretion of trace elements in rat urine after treatment with 2,3-dimercaptopropane sodium sulfonate. , 1979, Toxicology.

[6]  James V Jester,et al.  Extent of initial corneal injury as the mechanistic basis for ocular irritation: key findings and recommendations for the development of alternative assays. , 2002, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[7]  Hiroshi Jonai,et al.  The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) , 2004 .

[8]  J. Sina,et al.  Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: an in vitro assay of ocular irritancy. , 1992, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[9]  S D Gettings,et al.  The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: an evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase II) oil/water emulsions. , 1994, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[10]  Y. Ohno,et al.  Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (8) Evaluation of cytotoxicity tests on SIRC cells. , 1999, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[11]  D M Bagley,et al.  Eye irritation: Reference chemicals data bank. , 1992, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[12]  Y. Ohno,et al.  Interlaboratory validation of in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (2) Chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) test. , 1999, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[13]  William C. McCormick,et al.  The sda alternatives program: comparison of In Vitro Data with draize test data , 1989 .

[14]  M Balls,et al.  Neutral red release from pre-loaded cells as an in vitro approach to testing for eye irritancy potential. , 1990, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[15]  D. J. Kain,et al.  Evaluation of seven in vitro alternatives for ocular safety testing. , 1991, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[16]  S D Gettings,et al.  The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: an evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase III) surfactant-based formulations. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[17]  M Liebsch,et al.  Eye Irritation Testing: The Way Forward. The Report and Recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 34. , 1999, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[18]  Y Ohno,et al.  Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (1) Overview of the validation study and Draize scores for the evaluation of the tests. , 1999, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[19]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  Dendritic Cells as a Tool for the Predictive Identification of Skin Sensitisation Hazard , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[20]  D. Acosta,et al.  IRAG working group 4: Cell cytotoxicity assays , 1997 .

[21]  J. Robinson,et al.  Altered bioavailability of drugs in the eye due to drug-protein interaction. , 1973, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[22]  P. Vanparys,et al.  Prevalidation of a new in vitro reconstituted human cornea model to assess the eye irritating potential of chemicals. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[23]  James C. Murphy,et al.  Ocular irritancy responses to various pHs of acids and bases with and without irrigation. , 1982, Toxicology.