Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects.

1. The "descending contralateral movement detector" (DCMD) neuron in the locust has been challenged with a variety of moving stimuli, including scenes from a film (Star Wars), moving disks, and images generated by computer. The neuron responds well to any rapid movement. For a dark object moving along a straight path at a uniform velocity, the DCMD gives the strongest response when the object travels directly toward the eye, and the weakest when the object travels away from the eye. Instead of expressing selectivity for movements of small rather than large objects, the DCMD responds preferentially to approaching objects. 2. The neuron shows a clear selectivity for approach over recession for a variety of sizes and velocities of movement both of real objects and in simulated movements. When a disk that subtends > or = 5 degrees at the eye approaches the eye, there are two peaks in spike rate: one immediately after the start of movement; and a second that builds up during the approach. When a disk recedes from the eye, there is a single peak in response as the movement starts. There is a good correlation between spike rate and angular acceleration of the edges of the image over the eye. 3. When an object approaches from a distance sufficient for it to subtend less than one interommatidial angle at the start of its approach, there is a single peak in response. The DCMD tracks the approach, and, if the object moves at 1 m/s or faster, the spike rate increases throughout the duration of object movement. The size of the response depends on the speed of approach. 4. It is unlikely that the DCMD encodes the time to collision accurately, because the response depends on the size as well as the velocity of an approaching object. 5. Wide-field movements suppress the response to an approaching object. The suppression varies with the temporal frequency of the background pattern. 6. Over a wide range of contrasts of object against background, the DCMD gives a stronger response to approaching than to receding objects. For low contrasts, the selectivity is greater for objects that are darker than the background than for objects that are lighter.

[1]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  John Palka,et al.  An inhibitory process influencing visual responses in a fibre of the ventral nerve cord of locusts , 1967 .

[3]  C. Rowell,et al.  Variable Responsiveness of a Visual Interneurone in the Free-Moving Locust, and its Relation to Behaviour and Arousal , 1971 .

[4]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Binocular neurons which signal change of disparity in area 18 of cat visual cortex. , 1973, Nature: New biology.

[5]  S. Zeki.  Cells responding to changing image size and disparity in the cortex of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  M. O'Shea,et al.  Protection from habituation by lateral inhibition , 1975, Nature.

[7]  M O'shea,et al.  The neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. II. response decrement, convergence, and the nature of the excitatory afferents to the fan-like dendrites of the LGMD. , 1976, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  W. J. Heitler,et al.  The locust jump. I. The motor programme. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  G. Schlotterer.  Response of the locust descending movement detector neuron to rapidly approaching and withdrawing visual stimuli , 1977 .

[10]  W. J. Heitler,et al.  The locust jump. II. Neural circuits of the motor programme. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  H. Southern,et al.  Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa; the Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978 .

[12]  ROBERT B. PINTER.  Visual discrimination between small objects and large textured backgrounds , 1977, Nature.

[13]  C. H. Fraser Rowell,et al.  The neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. IV. The preference for small field stimuli. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[15]  G A Horridge,et al.  The separation of visual axes in apposition compound eyes. , 1978, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  M. Cynader,et al.  Neurones in cat parastriate cortex sensitive to the direction of motion in three‐dimensional space , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  R. B. Pinter,et al.  Inhibition and Excitation in the Locust DCMD Receptive Field: Spatial Frequency, Temporal and Spatial Characteristics , 1979 .

[18]  C. Rowell,et al.  Saccadic suppression by corollary discharge in the locust , 1979, Nature.

[19]  D. Regan,et al.  Neurons in area 18 of cat visual cortex selectively sensitive to changing size: Nonlinear interactions between responses to two edges , 1979, Vision Research.

[20]  D. Regan,et al.  Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage , 1979, Vision Research.

[21]  Peter J. Simmons,et al.  Connexions between a movement-detecting visual interneurone and flight motoneurones of a locust. , 1980 .

[22]  W. J. Heitler,et al.  Triggering of locust jump by multimodal inhibitory interneurons. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  G. Poggio,et al.  Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Presynaptic inhibition of transmission from identified interneurons in locust central nervous system. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Robert M. Olberg,et al.  Is the Locust DCMD A Looming Detector , 1982 .

[26]  Neural circuits for jumping in the locust. , 1982, Journal de physiologie.

[27]  Donald H. Edwards.  The Cockroach DCMD Neurone: I. Lateral Inhibition and the Effects of Light- and Dark-adaptation , 1982 .

[28]  D. Regan,et al.  Neurons in cat visual cortex tuned to the direction of motion in depth: Effect of positional disparity , 1982, Vision Research.

[29]  M. Cynader,et al.  Neurons in cat visual cortex tuned to the direction of motion in depth: effect of stimulus speed. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  M. Zaretsky,et al.  Quantitative measurements of centrally and retinally generated saccadic suppression in a locust movement detector neurone. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Response vs excitation in response-dependent and stimulus-dependent lateral inhibitory networks , 1983, Vision Research.

[32]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual fields for frontal plane motion and for changing size , 1983, Vision Research.

[33]  F C Rind,et al.  A chemical synapse between two motion detecting neurones in the locust brain. , 1984, The Journal of experimental biology.

[34]  K G Pearson,et al.  An evaluation of the role of identified interneurons in triggering kicks and jumps in the locust. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual field defects for unidirectional and oscillatory motion in depth , 1989, Vision Research.

[36]  R. Wurtz,et al.  The role of disparity-sensitive cortical neurons in signalling the direction of self-motion , 1990, Nature.

[37]  F C Rind,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. II. Critical cues for detecting approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.