Histological and biomechanical analysis of porous additive manufactured implants made by direct metal laser sintering: a pilot study in sheep.

OBJECTIVES It was the aim of this study to analyze osseointegrative properties of porous additive manufactured titanium implants made by direct metal laser sintering in a sheep model after an implantation period of 2 and 8 weeks. MATERIAL AND METHODS Three different types of implants were placed in the pelvis of six sheep. In each sheep were placed three standard machined (M), three sandblasted and etched (SE), and three porous additive manufactured (AM) implants. Of these three implants (one per type) were examined histologically and six implants were tested biomechanically. Additionally a semiquantitative histomorphometrical and qualitative fluorescent microscopic analysis were performed. RESULTS After 2 and 8 weeks bone-to-implant-contact (BIC) values of the AM surface (2w: 20.49% ± 5.18%; 8w: 43.91% ± 9.69%) revealed no statistical significant differences in comparison to the M (2w: 20.33% ± 11.50%; 8w: 25.33% ± 4.61%) and SE (2w: 43.67 ± 12.22%; 8w: 53.33 ± 8.96%) surfaces. AM surface showed the highest increase of the BIC between the two observation time points. Considering the same implantation period histomorphometry and fluorescent labelling disclosed no significant differences in the bone surrounding the three implants groups. In contrast Removal-torque-test showed a significant improve in fixation strength (P ≤ 0.001) for the AM (1891.82 ± 308, 44 Nmm) surface after eight weeks in comparison to the M (198.93±88,04 Nmm) and SE (730.08 ± 151,89 Nmm) surfaces. CONCLUSION All three surfaces (M, SE, and AM) showed sound osseointegration. AM implants may offer a possible treatment option in clinics for patients with compromised bone situations.

[1]  D. Scharnweber,et al.  Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep. , 2008, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  G. Romanos,et al.  Implant Surface Morphology and Primary Stability: Is There a Connection? , 2011, Implant dentistry.

[3]  R. Giardino,et al.  Sheep model in orthopedic research: a literature review. , 2001, Comparative medicine.

[4]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. , 2010, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  M. Akens,et al.  Upregulation of mRNA of interleukin-1 and -6 in subchondral cystic lesions of four horses. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[6]  P. Trisi,et al.  High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible. , 2011, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  Francesca De Crescenzio,et al.  Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) of a customized titanium mesh for prosthetically guided bone regeneration of atrophic maxillary arches , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  A Scarano,et al.  Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  C. Elias,et al.  Improving osseointegration of dental implants , 2010, Expert review of medical devices.

[10]  M. Kürkçü,et al.  Osseointegration and stability of a modified sand-blasted acid-etched implant: an experimental pilot study in sheep. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  Hom-Lay Wang,et al.  The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  M Bohner,et al.  In vivo behavior of three different injectable hydraulic calcium phosphate cements. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[13]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Osseointegration and biocompatibility of different metal implants - a comparative experimental investigation in sheep , 2012, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[14]  N. Fazzalari,et al.  Influence of surface roughness and shape on microdamage of the osseous surface adjacent to titanium dental implants. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  D B Kimmel,et al.  A quantitative histologic study of bone turnover in young adult beagles , 1982, The Anatomical record.

[16]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Direct Selective Laser Sintering of Hard Metal Powders: Experimental Study and Simulation , 2002 .

[17]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  M. Figliuzzi,et al.  A novel root analogue dental implant using CT scan and CAD/CAM: selective laser melting technology. , 2012, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[19]  A Piattelli,et al.  Direct laser metal sintering as a new approach to fabrication of an isoelastic functionally graded material for manufacture of porous titanium dental implants. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[20]  M. von Walter,et al.  Structural, mechanical and in vitro characterization of individually structured Ti-6Al-4V produced by direct laser forming. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[21]  C. Bowen,et al.  Development of Modelling Methods for Materials to be Used as Bone Substitutes , 2007 .

[22]  R. Sader,et al.  Comparison of Er:YAG laser, piezoelectric, and drill osteotomy for dental implant site preparation: A biomechanical and histological analysis in sheep , 2010, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[23]  P. Coelho,et al.  Characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered dental endosseous implants in dogs. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[24]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  P. Trisi,et al.  Osseointegration of Osseotite and machined titanium implants in autogenous bone graft. A histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  Francesco Guido Mangano,et al.  Custom-made, root-analogue direct laser metal forming implant: a case report , 2012, Lasers in Medical Science.