Tweeting the meeting: Quantitative and qualitative twitter activity during the 38th ESSO conference.

INTRODUCTION Social media is increasingly used to share information with the potential for fast and wide reach. Data on use during surgical oncology conferences is limited. We aimed to monitor twitter usage during a surgical oncology conference to audit impact of activity. METHODS A prospective, time-restricted, observational study of twitter activity using the #ESSO38 hashtag in the week before and during the 38th ESSO conference (10-12 October 2018; Budapest, Hungary). Data on individual tweets and retweets, including date and tweeter or retweeter were collected using NodeXL, FollowTheHashtag, Twitonomy and TAGS. RESULTS The study period (10-13 October) documented 328 tweets by 58 tweeters with 1167 retweets, with a soaring activity and mentions during the conference days, with a potential reach at over 7.5 million. The nodal network of tweets, the most active tweeters and retweeters are presented as well as the most frequently used hashtags. The top 3 hashtags used were #ESSO38, #SoMe4Surgery# and #EYSAC. A positive influence on the @ESSOweb twitter handle was noted, with the numbers of followers growing from 1.5 K to over 1.8 K representing a 20% growth in just over a week. CONCLUSIONS Activity on tweeter during the conference was considerable, with a potential for a wide reach beyond those attending the conference. A more structured approach to the use of twitter for future conferences may enhance experience, activity and reach.

[1]  K. Søreide Numbers needed to tweet: social media and impact on surgery. , 2019, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[2]  J. Mayol,et al.  #colorectalsurgery , 2017, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  J. Mayol,et al.  Value of social media in advancing surgical research , 2017, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  D. Radford,et al.  Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2013–2016 , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  Tejas Desai,et al.  Analysis of the Use and Impact of Twitter During American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meetings From 2011 to 2016: Focus on Advanced Metrics and User Trends. , 2017, Journal of oncology practice.

[6]  R. Mesa,et al.  The use and impact of Twitter at medical conferences: Best practices and Twitter etiquette. , 2017, Seminars in hematology.

[7]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  Uso de Twitter ® y sus implicaciones en las reuniones y congresos de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos , 2018, Cirugía Española.

[8]  Lillian S Kao,et al.  Use of Twitter to document the 2013 Academic Surgical Congress. , 2014, The Journal of surgical research.

[9]  J. Mayol,et al.  Twitter® use and its implications in Spanish Association of Surgeons meetings and congresses. , 2018, Cirugia espanola.

[10]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  #PlasticSurgery , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  C. Udovicich,et al.  Tweeting the meeting: A comparative analysis of an Australian emergency medicine conference over four years , 2016, Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock.

[12]  Naveen Pemmaraju,et al.  Disease-specific hashtags and the creation of Twitter medical communities in hematology and oncology. , 2017, Seminars in hematology.

[13]  D. Light,et al.  Is sharing speaker's slides from conference presentations on social media a breach of intellectual property or a delegate's right? Depends who you ask. , 2018, International journal of surgery.

[14]  Mark Kats,et al.  Tweeting the Meeting: An In-Depth Analysis of Twitter Activity at Kidney Week 2011 , 2012, PloS one.