Comparison of FFNN and ANFIS models for estimating groundwater level

Prediction of water level is an important task for groundwater planning and management when the water balance consistently tends toward negative values. In Maheshwaram watershed situated in the Ranga Reddy District of Andhra Pradesh, groundwater is overexploited, and groundwater resources management requires complete understanding of the dynamic nature of groundwater flow. Yet, the dynamic nature of groundwater flow is continually changing in response to human and climatic stresses, and the groundwater system is too intricate, involving many nonlinear and uncertain factors. Artificial neural network (ANN) models are introduced into groundwater science as a powerful, flexible, statistical modeling technique to address complex pattern recognition problems. This study presents the comparison of two methods, i.e., feed-forward neural network (FFNN) trained with Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm compared with a fuzzy logic adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model for better accuracy of the estimation of the groundwater levels of the Maheshwaram watershed. The statistical indices used in the analysis were the root mean square error (RMSE), regression coefficient (R2) and error variation (EV).The results show that FFNN-LM and ANFIS models provide better accuracy (RMSE = 4.45 and 4.94, respectively, R2 is 93% for both models) for estimating groundwater levels well in advance for the above location.

[1]  Piotr S. Szczepaniak,et al.  Computational intelligence and applications , 1999 .

[2]  H. Mori,et al.  Optimal fuzzy inference for short-term load forecasting , 1995 .

[3]  Jyh-Shing Roger Jang,et al.  ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network , 1992 .

[5]  P. Guan,et al.  Forecasting model for the incidence of hepatitis A based on artificial neural network. , 2004, World journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Understanding the behaviour and optimising the performance of back-propagation neural networks: an empirical study , 1998 .

[7]  A. Altunkaynak Forecasting Surface Water Level Fluctuations of Lake Van by Artificial Neural Networks , 2007 .

[8]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[9]  R. A. Scofield,et al.  Artificial neural network techniques for estimating heavy convective rainfall and recognizing cloud mergers from satellite data , 1994 .

[10]  Momcilo Markus,et al.  PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND CONCEPTUAL MODELS , 2000 .

[11]  Bernard Bobée,et al.  Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach , 2000 .

[12]  François Anctil,et al.  Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  William Remus,et al.  Neural Network Models for Time Series Forecasts , 1996 .

[14]  George G. Karady,et al.  Fuzzy logic for short term load forecasting , 1996 .

[15]  I. Dimopoulos,et al.  Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology , 1996 .

[16]  A. Knoll,et al.  Neuro-Fuzzy Modelling of Time Series , 2001 .

[17]  A. Comrie Comparing Neural Networks and Regression Models for Ozone Forecasting , 1997 .

[18]  Fernando Gustavo Tomasel,et al.  Prediction of functional characteristics of ecosystems: a comparison of artificial neural networks and regression models , 1997 .

[19]  B. Bobée,et al.  Multivariate Reservoir Inflow Forecasting Using Temporal Neural Networks , 2001 .

[20]  Surajit Chattopadhyay,et al.  Neuro-computing based short range prediction of some meteorological parameters during the pre-monsoon season , 2005, Soft Comput..

[21]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resource variables: a review of modelling issues and applications , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  E. Toth,et al.  Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting , 2000 .

[23]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  FEED FORWARD NETWORKS ARE UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATORS , 1989 .

[24]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[25]  Paul A. Fishwick,et al.  Feedforward Neural Nets as Models for Time Series Forecasting , 1993, INFORMS J. Comput..

[26]  Srinivasa Lingireddy,et al.  A neural-network-based classification scheme for sorting sources and ages of fecal contamination in water. , 2002, Water research.

[27]  Guoqiang Peter Zhang,et al.  Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[28]  Vennila Ramalingam,et al.  Measuring advertisement effectiveness - a neural network approach , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  B. Bobée,et al.  Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations , 2001 .

[30]  Bernard Bobée,et al.  Prévision hydrologique par réseaux de neurones artificiels : état de l'art , 1999 .

[31]  Paulin Coulibaly,et al.  Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks , 2005 .

[32]  Ajith Abraham,et al.  Neurocomputing based Canadian weather analysis , 2002 .

[33]  B. Bobée,et al.  Improving extreme hydrologic events forecasting using a new criterion for artificial neural network selection , 2001 .

[34]  Surajit Chattopadhyay,et al.  Prediction of Severe thunderstorms with Minimal a priori Information , 2005, Adv. Complex Syst..