Are Brain Functions Really Additive?

Although Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies commonly subtract data obtained during two or more experimental conditions to decompose a complex task, there have been few opportunities to evaluate this approach directly. In the present study, PET was used to study three motor speech tasks selected such that two were constituent components of the third, making possible a direct examination of decomposition by subtraction. In Experiment 1, a group of 13 right-handed normal volunteers participated in three activation studies: syllable repetition; phonation; and repetitive lip closure. A scanning session was devoted to a single task, repeated four times. In Experiment 2, six of the original subjects performed the same three activation studies during a single scanning session. Whether tasks were studied in separate scanning sessions or combined within a single session, the results of decomposition by compound subtraction differed significantly from the results obtained when individual tasks were compared to a simple baseline condition. These data failed to demonstrate task additivity, a necessary property if decomposition by subtraction is to provide an accurate characterization of the brain activity accompanying complex behavior.

[1]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Detection of Thirty-Second Cognitive Activations in Single Subjects with Positron Emission Tomography: A New Low-Dose H215O Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Three-Dimensional Imaging Technique , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[2]  S. Petersen,et al.  Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. , 1990, Science.

[3]  F Henry-Le Bros,et al.  Cerebral blood flow and metabolism, L Edvinsson, E Mackenzie, J McCulloch. Raven Press, Paris (1993) , 1994 .

[4]  S. Strother,et al.  Predicting Performance From Functional Imaging Data , 1998, NeuroImage.

[5]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Cognitive Subtractions May Not Add Up: The Interaction between Semantic Processing and Response Mode , 1997, NeuroImage.

[6]  R. Woods,et al.  Principal Component Analysis and the Scaled Subprofile Model Compared to Intersubject Averaging and Statistical Parametric Mapping: I. “Functional Connectivity” of the Human Motor System Studied with [15O]Water PET , 1995, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[7]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism , 1993 .

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Trouble with Cognitive Subtraction , 1996, NeuroImage.

[9]  Gary Michael Maranell,et al.  Scaling: A Sourcebook for Behavioral Scientists , 1974 .

[10]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Statistical mimicking of reaction time data: Single-process models, parameter variability, and mixtures , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .