Adhesion measurements on the attachment devices of the jumping spider Evarcha arcuata

SUMMARY The feet of the jumping spider Evarcha arcuata attach to rough substrates using tarsal claws. On smooth surfaces, however, attachment is achieved by means of a claw tuft, the scopula. All eight feet bear a tarsal scopula, which is equipped with setae, these again being covered by numerous setules. In E. arcuata, an estimated 624 000 setules, with a mean contact area of 1.7×105 nm2, are present. The spider's entire contact area thus totals 1.06×1011 nm2. Adhesion to the substrate does not depend on the secretion of an adhesive fluid. Analysis via atomic force microscopy (AFM) shows that a single setule can produce an adhesive force (Fa) of 38.12 nN perpendicular to a surface. Consequently, at a total Fa of 2.38×10–2 N and a mean body mass of 15.1 mg, a safety factor (SF; Fa/Fm, where Fm is weight) of 160 is achieved. Tenacity (τn; Fa/A, where A is area of contact) amounts to 2.24×105 N m-2.

[1]  A. F. G. Dixon,et al.  The Mechanism by Which Aphids Adhere to Smooth Surfaces , 1990 .

[2]  G. Walker,et al.  The adhesive organ of the blowfly, Calliphora vomitoria: a functional approach (Diptera: Calliphoridae) , 1985 .

[3]  Paul K. Hansma,et al.  Imaging adhesion forces and elasticity of lysozyme adsorbed on mica with the atomic force microscope , 1994 .

[4]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  A comparison of the adhesive setae on the feet of lizards and arthropods , 1983 .

[5]  Hartmann.  van der Waals interactions between sharp probes and flat sample surfaces. , 1991, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[6]  W. Barnes,et al.  Adhesion and Detachment of the Toe Pads of Tree Frogs , 1991 .

[7]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  The design of the fly adhesive pad: distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Robert N. Fisher,et al.  A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad‐bearing lizards , 1996 .

[9]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Adhesion of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a Variety of Surfaces , 1980 .

[10]  J. Vincent,et al.  Rheological properties of the extensible intersegmental membrane of the adult female locust , 1973 .

[11]  D. Hill,et al.  The pretarsus of salticid spiders , 1977 .

[12]  R. Ruibal,et al.  The structure of the digital setae of lizards , 1965, Journal of morphology.

[13]  S. Emerson,et al.  Toe pad morphology and mechanisms of sticking in frogs , 1980 .

[14]  G. Walker.  Adhesion to smooth surfaces by insects — a review , 1993 .

[15]  Gerber,et al.  Atomic Force Microscope , 2020, Definitions.

[16]  A. Kesel,et al.  Changes in the structure of the cuticle of Ixodes ricinus L. 1758 (Acari, Ixodidae) during feeding. , 2002, Arthropod structure & development.

[17]  T. Eisner,et al.  Defense by foot adhesion in a beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea). , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. Gorb,et al.  Scale effects on the attachment pads and friction forces in syrphid flies (Diptera, Syrphidae). , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  A scanning electron microscope study of tarsal adhesive setae in the Coleoptera , 1980 .

[20]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Attachment forces of ants measured with a centrifuge: better 'wax-runners' have a poorer attachment to a smooth surface. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  Professor Dr. Werner Nachtigall.  Biological Mechanisms of Attachment , 1974, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[22]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[23]  H. M. Pollock,et al.  Surface Forces and Adhesion , 1992 .

[24]  U. Hiller.  Untersuchungen zum Feinbau und zur Funktion der Haftborsten von Reptilien , 1968, Zeitschrift für Morphologie der Tiere.

[25]  T. Weis-Fogh,et al.  Biology and physics of locust flight. V. Strength and elasticity of locust cuticle , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[26]  David M. Green,et al.  Adhesion and the Toe-pads of Treefrogs , 1981 .

[27]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Daniel J. Aneshansley,et al.  Defense by foot adhesion in a chrysomelid beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea): characterization of the adhesive oil. , 2000 .

[29]  J. Vincent,et al.  ON THE INDENTATION HARDNESS OF INSECT CUTICLE , 1982 .

[30]  J. A. Peterson,et al.  Convergent and Alternative Designs in the Digital Adhesive Pads of Scincid Lizards , 1982, Science.

[31]  Y. Jiao,et al.  Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, insecta). , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  S. Gorb.  Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle , 2001, Springer Netherlands.