Shifting the Load: a Peer Dialogue Agent that Encourages its Human Collaborator to Contribute More to Problem Solving
暂无分享,去创建一个
Barbara Di Eugenio | Sandra Katz | Pamela W. Jordan | Cynthia Howard | Sandra Katz | Barbara Maria Di Eugenio | Cynthia Howard
[1] Doug Baldwin,et al. Guest Editors’ Introduction: Computer Science in the Liberal Arts , 2010, TOCE.
[2] Jeannette M. Wing. An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation , 2007, SIGCSE.
[3] Baochuan Lu,et al. Five focused strategies for increasing retention in Computer Science 1 , 2011 .
[4] Claus Zinn,et al. The Role of Initiative in Tutorial Dialogue , 2003, EACL.
[5] Ursula Fuller,et al. Developing a computer science-specific learning taxonomy , 2007, ACM SIGCSE Bull..
[6] John R. Anderson. Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .
[7] John Mason,et al. Why the high attrition rate for computer science students: some thoughts and observations , 2005, SGCS.
[8] G. A. Miller,et al. Finitary models of language users , 1963 .
[9] J. Stasko,et al. A Meta-Study of Algorithm Visualization Effectiveness , 2002, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..
[10] Carol K. K. Chan. Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information , 2001 .
[11] Sandra Katz,et al. Gender, achievement, and persistence in an undergraduate computer science program , 2006, DATB.
[12] Csr Young,et al. How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .
[13] Tracy Camp,et al. An ACM-W literature review on women in computing , 2002, SGCS.
[14] Elliot Soloway,et al. Studying the Novice Programmer , 1988 .
[15] Davide Fossati,et al. ChiQat-Tutor: An Integrated Environment for Learning Recursion , 2014 .
[16] Brigid Barron. When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .
[17] K. VanLehn,et al. Coached program planning: dialogue-based support for novice program design , 2003, SIGCSE.
[18] Curry I. Guinn,et al. An Analysis of Initiative Selection in Collaborative Task-Oriented Discourse , 1998, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.
[19] Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al. Tools for Authoring a Dialogue Agent that Participates in Learning Studies , 2007, AIED.
[20] John G. Cleary,et al. K*: An Instance-based Learner Using and Entropic Distance Measure , 1995, ICML.
[21] John J. Sullivan,et al. Intelligence and experience , 1963 .
[22] Davide Fossati. Data driven automatic feedback generation in the iList intelligent tutoring system , 2014 .
[23] Leon E. Winslow,et al. Programming pedagogy—a psychological overview , 1996, SGCS.
[24] Lisa S. Blackwell,et al. Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. , 2007, Child development.
[25] Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al. A Tutorial Dialogue System for Real-Time Evaluation of Unsupervised Dialogue Act Classifiers: Exploring System Outcomes , 2015, AIED.
[26] Margaret M. Recker,et al. Learning Strategies and Transfer in the Domain of Programming , 1994 .
[27] Sandra Katz,et al. Is a Dialogue-Based Tutoring System that Emulates Helpful Co-constructed Relations During Human Tutoring Effective? , 2015, AIED.
[28] Acm Ieee-Cs Joint Curriculum Task Force. Computing Curricula 2001: Computer Science , 2002 .
[29] David E. Meltzer,et al. Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational format , 2005 .
[30] S. Argamon,et al. Hedged Responses and Expressions of Affect in Human/Human and Human/Computer Tutorial Interactions , 2004 .
[31] William W. Cohen. Fast Effective Rule Induction , 1995, ICML.
[32] Jun Xu,et al. A problem solving oriented intelligent tutoring system to improve students' acquisition of basic computer skills , 2015, Comput. Educ..
[33] L. Thomas,et al. A cognitive approach to identifying measurable milestones for programming skill acquisition , 2006, ITiCSE-WGR '06.
[34] Richard James,et al. A cognitive approach to identifying measurable milestones for programming skill acquisition , 2006, ACM SIGCSE Bull..
[35] Sandra Katz. Gendered Attrition at the Undergraduate Level , 2006 .
[36] Sandra Katz,et al. Gender and race in predicting achievement in computer science , 2003, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..
[37] Amy Soller,et al. Computational Modeling and Analysis of Knowledge Sharing in Collaborative Distance Learning , 2004, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.
[38] Barbara Di Eugenio,et al. Knowledge Co-construction and Initiative in Peer Learning Interactions , 2009, AIED.
[39] Shaochun Xu,et al. Cognitive process during program debugging , 2004, Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics, 2004..
[40] Barbara Di Eugenio,et al. Modeling Knowledge Co-Construction for Peer Learning Interactions ? , 2008 .
[41] Alex Lascarides,et al. Indirect Speech Acts , 2001, Synthese.
[42] 田村 剛. アメリカにおける情報処理関連職種--Occupational Outlook Handbook 1990-1991 Editionを中心にして , 1992 .
[43] Sylvia Beyer,et al. Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades , 2014, Comput. Sci. Educ..
[44] Barbara Di Eugenio,et al. KSC-PaL: A Peer Learning Agent , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
[45] J. Flavell. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving , 1976 .
[46] Herbert J. Walberg,et al. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. , 1991 .
[47] Barbara Di Eugenio,et al. Control and Initiative in Collaborative Problem Solving Dialogues , 1997 .
[48] Hans Spada,et al. Motivation and emotion in shaping knowledge co-construction , 2013 .
[49] P. Pirolli,et al. The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of recursive programming skills. , 1985 .
[50] Oscar N. Garcia,et al. Cognitive activities and support in debugging , 1998, Proceedings Fourth Annual Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems.
[51] Fred Karlsson,et al. Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses , 2007 .
[52] Fan Yang,et al. Control in task-oriented dialogues , 2003, INTERSPEECH.
[53] Helen Gartley,et al. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education , 2002 .
[54] Heather H. Mitchell,et al. AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[55] David R. Traum,et al. Initiative Taking in Negotiation , 2014, SIGDIAL Conference.
[56] Terry Scott. Bloom's taxonomy applied to testing in computer science classes , 2003 .
[57] John Leaney,et al. Introductory programming, criterion-referencing, and bloom , 2003, SIGCSE.
[58] J. Norwood,et al. Occupational outlook handbook , 1990 .
[59] David McLean,et al. An adaptation algorithm for an intelligent natural language tutoring system , 2014, Comput. Educ..
[60] Davide Fossati,et al. Towards explaining effective tutorial dialogues , 2009 .
[61] Davide Fossati,et al. Supporting Computer Science Curriculum: Exploring and Learning Linked Lists with iList , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[62] M. Chi,et al. Learning from collaborative problem solving: An analysis of three hypothesized Mechanisms , 2004 .
[63] Mordechai Ben-Ari,et al. Constructivism in computer science education , 1998, SIGCSE '98.
[64] R. Kozma. The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding , 2003 .
[65] Brenda Cantwell Wilson,et al. A Study of Factors Promoting Success in Computer Science Including Gender Differences , 2002, Comput. Sci. Educ..
[66] Fan Yang,et al. Initiative conflicts in task-oriented dialogue , 2010, Comput. Speech Lang..
[67] Mark Guzdial,et al. Success in introductory programming: what works? , 2013, CACM.
[68] Daniel D. Suthers,et al. Coaching Web-based Collaborative Learning based on Problem Solution Differences and Participation , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..
[69] Lecia Jane Barker,et al. Making Visible the Behaviors that Influence Learning Environment: A Qualitative Exploration of Computer Science Classrooms , 2004, Comput. Sci. Educ..
[70] Marilyn A. Walker,et al. Mixed Initiative in Dialogue: An Investigation into Discourse Segmentation , 1990, ACL.
[71] Michelene T. H. Chi,et al. Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[72] Rachel Harsley. Learning Together: Expanding the One-To-One ITS Model for Computer Science Education , 2015, ICER.
[73] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. Confusion and complex learning during interactions with computer learning environments , 2012, Internet High. Educ..
[74] Joel A. Michael,et al. Classifying Student Initiatives and Tutor Responses in Human Keyboard-to-Keyboard Tutoring Sessions , 2002 .
[75] Pamela W. Jordan. Topic Initiative in a Simulated Peer Dialogue Agent , 2007, AIED.
[76] Jennifer Chu-Carroll,et al. An Evidential Model for Tracking Initiative in Collaborative Dialogue Interactions , 1998, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.
[77] Anthony Scime,et al. Globalized computing education: Europe and the United States , 2008, Comput. Sci. Educ..
[78] Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al. In-Context Evaluation of Unsupervised Dialogue Act Models for Tutorial Dialogue , 2013, SIGDIAL Conference.
[79] J. Searle. What is a Speech Act , 1996 .
[80] Allan Fisher,et al. Undergraduate women in computer science: experience, motivation and culture , 1997, SIGCSE '97.
[81] Antonija Mitrovic,et al. DB-Suite: Experiences with Three Intelligent, Web-Based Database Tutors. , 2004 .
[82] Nickolas J. G. Falkner,et al. A fast measure for identifying at-risk students in computer science , 2012, ICER '12.
[83] Leen-Kiat Soh. Incorporating an intelligent tutoring system into CS1 , 2006, SIGCSE '06.
[84] V. Jovanovic. Computer Science Curriculum 2013- An example , 2013, 2013 36th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO).
[85] Sue Fitzgerald,et al. Debugging: a review of the literature from an educational perspective , 2008, Comput. Sci. Educ..
[86] Cameron L. Fadjo,et al. EngageCSEdu: engaging and retaining CS1 and CS2 students , 2015, Inroads.
[87] Crina Damsa,et al. The multi-layered nature of small-group learning: Productive interactions in object-oriented collaboration , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..
[88] Eileen Kraemer,et al. A spirit of camaraderie: The impact of pair programming on retention , 2013, 2013 26th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T).
[89] Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al. Investigating the Relationship Between Dialogue Structure and Tutoring Effectiveness: A Hidden Markov Modeling Approach , 2011, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..
[90] Johanna D. Moore,et al. BEETLE II: Deep Natural Language Understanding and Automatic Feedback Generation for Intelligent Tutoring in Basic Electricity and Electronics , 2014, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
[91] D. Janaki Ram,et al. Identification of Cognitive Processes of Effective and Ineffective Students During Computer Programming , 2010, TOCE.