Review of UK microgeneration. Part 1: Policy and behavioural aspects

A critical review of the literature relating to government policy and behavioural aspects relevant to the uptake and application of microgeneration in the UK is presented. Given the current policy context aspiring to zero-carbon new homes by 2016 and a variety of minimum standards and financial policy instruments supporting microgeneration in existing dwellings, it appears that this class of technologies could make a significant contribution to UK energy supply and low-carbon buildings in the future. Indeed, achievement of a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 80% (the UK government's 2050 target) for the residential sector may entail substantial deployment of microgeneration. Realisation of the large potential market for microgeneration relies on a variety of inter-related factors such as microeconomics, behavioural aspects, the structure of supporting policy instruments and well-informed technology development. This article explores these issues in terms of current and proposed policy instruments in the UK. Behavioural aspects associated with both initial uptake of the technology and after purchase are also considered.

[1]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Representing the demand side: 'deficit' beliefs about domestic electricity users , 2005 .

[2]  S. Owens,et al.  How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy , 2008 .

[3]  Jim Watson,et al.  Strategies for the deployment of micro-generation: Implications for social acceptance , 2007 .

[4]  Reinhard Haas,et al.  SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF THE AUSTRIAN 200 kWp-PHOTOVOLTAIC-ROOFTOP PROGRAMME , 1999 .

[5]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  Cost-effective operating strategy for residential micro-combined heat and power , 2007 .

[6]  C. Martin,et al.  Analysis of Performance Parameters for UK Domestic PV Systems , 2006, 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference.

[7]  Kathryn B. Janda.  TURNING SOLAR CONSUMERS INTO SOLAR CITIZENS: STRATEGIES FOR WISE ENERGY USE , 2007 .

[8]  L. Toledo-Pereyra.  Trust , 2006, Mediation Behaviour.

[9]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[10]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany , 2006 .

[11]  B. Boardman.  Behavioural responses to photovoltaic systems in the UK domestic sector , 2006 .

[12]  Wander Jager,et al.  Stimulating the diffusion of photovoltaic systems: A behavioural perspective , 2006 .

[13]  H. Herring,et al.  Improving the energy performance of UK households: Results from surveys of consumer adoption and use of low- and zero-carbon technologies , 2008 .

[14]  Kristen Averyt,et al.  IPCC, 2007: Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[15]  R. Rosenfeld.  Strategy , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[16]  Jim Watson,et al.  Co-provision in sustainable energy systems: the case of micro-generation , 2004 .

[17]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Seeing What's Next: Using the Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change , 2005 .

[18]  S. Sorrell.  The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency , 2007 .

[19]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[20]  M. Newborough,et al.  Impact of micro-CHP systems on domestic sector CO2 emissions , 2005 .