Variation in the Carotid Bifurcation Geometry of Young Versus Older Adults: Implications for Geometric Risk of Atherosclerosis

Background and Purpose— Retrospective analysis of clinical data has demonstrated major variations in carotid bifurcation geometry, in support of the notion that an individual’s vascular anatomy or local hemodynamics may influence the development of atherosclerosis. On the other hand, anecdotal evidence suggests that vessel geometry is more homogenous in youth, which would tend to undermine this geometric risk hypothesis. The purpose of our study was to test whether the latter is indeed the case. Methods— Cross-sectional images of the carotid bifurcations of 25 young adults (24±4 years) and a control group of 25 older subjects (63±10 years) were acquired via MRI. Robust and objective techniques were developed to automatically characterize the 3D geometry of the bifurcation and the relative dimensions of the internal, external, and common carotid arteries (ICA, ECA, and CCA, respectively). Results— Young vessels exhibited significantly less interindividual variation in the following geometric parameters: bifurcation angle (48.5±6.3° versus 63.6±15.4°); ICA angle (21.6±6.7° versus 29.2±11.3°); CCA tortuosity (0.010±0.003 versus 0.014±0.011); ICA tortuosity (0.025±0.013 versus 0.086±0.105); ECA/CCA diameter ratio (0.81±0.06 versus 0.75±0.13), ICA/CCA (0.81±0.06 versus 0.77±0.12) diameter ratio, and bifurcation area ratio (1.32±0.15 versus 1.19±0.35). Conclusions— The finding of more modest interindividual variations in young adults suggests that, if there is a geometric risk for atherosclerosis, its early detection may prove challenging. Taken together with the major interindividual variations seen in older vessels, it suggests a more complex interrelationship between vascular geometry, local hemodynamics, vascular aging, and atherosclerosis, the elucidation of which now calls for prospective studies.

[1]  Örjan Smedby,et al.  Geometric risk factors for atherosclerosis in the aortic bifurcation: A digitized angiography study , 1996, Annals of biomedical engineering.

[2]  David A. Steinman,et al.  Robust and objective decomposition and mapping of bifurcating vessels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  David A Steinman,et al.  Anthropometric data for magnetic resonance imaging of the carotid bifurcation , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Peter M. Rothwell,et al.  Sex Differences in Carotid Bifurcation Anatomy and the Distribution of Atherosclerotic Plaque , 2001, Stroke.

[5]  S. Alper,et al.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. , 1999, JAMA.

[6]  L. Goubergrits,et al.  Atherosclerosis in the human common carotid artery. A morphometric study of 31 specimens. , 2001, Pathology, research and practice.

[7]  H. Steinmetz,et al.  Internal Carotid Artery Angle of Origin: A Novel Risk Factor for Early Carotid Atherosclerosis , 2003, Stroke.

[8]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Arterial geometry affects hemodynamics. A potential risk factor for athersoclerosis. , 1983, Atherosclerosis.

[9]  M. H. Friedman,et al.  Influence of the geometry of the left main coronary artery bifurcation on the distribution of sudanophilia in the daughter vessels. , 1997, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[10]  J. David Spence,et al.  Carotid Plaque Area: A Tool for Targeting and Evaluating Vascular Preventive Therapy , 2002, Stroke.

[11]  M. Fisher,et al.  Geometric factors of the bifurcation in carotid atherogenesis. , 1990, Stroke.

[12]  J S Milner,et al.  Rapid three-dimensional segmentation of the carotid bifurcation from serial MR images. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  L. Wilkins Does the geometry of the carotid bifurcation affect its predisposition to atheroma? , 1983, Stroke.

[14]  F. Forster,et al.  Geometric modeling of the carotid bifurcation in humans: Implications in ultrasonic doppler and radiologic investigations , 1985, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[15]  Örjan Smedby Geometrical Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis in the Femoral Artery: A Longitudinal Angiographic Study , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  David A Steinman,et al.  Image-based computational fluid dynamics: a new paradigm for monitoring hemodynamics and atherosclerosis. , 2004, Current drug targets. Cardiovascular & haematological disorders.

[17]  L. Goubergrits,et al.  Geometry of the human common carotid artery. A vessel cast study of 86 specimens. , 2002, Pathology, research and practice.

[18]  R. Heethaar,et al.  Pathological-anatomical study concerning the geometry and atherosclerosis of the carotid bifurcation. , 1990, European journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  Ö. Smedby,et al.  Tortuosity and atherosclerosis in the femoral artery: What is cause and what is effect? , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Peter M. Rothwell,et al.  Major Variation in Carotid Bifurcation Anatomy: A Possible Risk Factor for Plaque Development? , 2001, Stroke.

[21]  B. Rutt,et al.  Reconstruction of carotid bifurcation hemodynamics and wall thickness using computational fluid dynamics and MRI , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  B. Rutt,et al.  Reproducibility of Image-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of the Human Carotid Bifurcation , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  D A Steinman,et al.  A semi-automatic technique for measurement of arterial wall from black blood MRI. , 2001, Medical physics.