Hierarchical classes models for three-way three-mode binary data: interrelations and model selection

Several hierarchical classes models can be considered for the modeling of three-way three-mode binary data, including the INDCLAS model (Leenen, Van Mechelen, De Boeck, and Rosenberg, 1999), the Tucker3-HICLAS model (Ceulemans, Van Mechelen, and Leenen, 2003), the Tucker2-HICLAS model (Ceulemans and Van Mechelen, 2004), and the Tucker1-HICLAS model that is introduced in this paper. Two questions then may be raised: (1) how are these models interrelated, and (2) given a specific data set, which of these models should be selected, and in which rank? In the present paper, we deal with these questions by (1) showing that the distinct hierarchical classes models for three-way three-mode binary data can be organized into a partially ordered hierarchy, and (2) by presenting model selection strategies based on extensions of the well-known scree test and on the Akaike information criterion. The latter strategies are evaluated by means of an extensive simulation study and are illustrated with an application to interpersonal emotion data. Finally, the presented hierarchy and model selection strategies are related to corresponding work by Kiers (1991) for principal component models for three-way three-mode real-valued data.

[1]  P. Boeck,et al.  Hierarchical classes: Model and data analysis , 1988 .

[2]  Henk A. L. Kiers,et al.  Hierarchical relations among three-way methods , 1991 .

[3]  E. Fowlkes,et al.  Evaluating Logistic Models for Large Contingency Tables , 1988 .

[4]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[5]  Pieter M. Kroonenberg,et al.  Three-mode principal component analysis : theory and applications , 1983 .

[6]  H. Bozdogan Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[7]  Iven Van Mechelen,et al.  The conjunctive model of hierarchical classes , 1995 .

[8]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  The Meaning and Strategic Use of Factor Analysis , 1988 .

[9]  Iven Van Mechelen,et al.  Indclas: A three-way hierarchical classes model , 1999 .

[10]  Iven Van Mechelen,et al.  Tucker2 hierarchical classes analysis , 2004 .

[11]  Pieter M. Kroonenberg,et al.  Multiplicatieve decompositie van interacties bij oordelen over de werkelijkheidswaarde van televisiefilms [Multiplicative decomposition of interactions for judgements of realism of television films] , 1987 .

[12]  Iven Van Mechelen,et al.  Tucker3 hierarchical classes analysis , 2003 .

[13]  H. Kiers,et al.  Three-mode principal components analysis: choosing the numbers of components and sensitivity to local optima. , 2000, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[14]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[15]  Iven Van Mechelen,et al.  An Evaluation of Two Algorithms for Hierarchical Classes Analysis , 2001, J. Classif..

[16]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology , 1968 .

[17]  H. Bozdogan,et al.  Akaike's Information Criterion and Recent Developments in Information Complexity. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[18]  H. Kiers Towards a standardized notation and terminology in multiway analysis , 2000 .

[19]  E. A. Haggard,et al.  Intraclass Correlation and the Analysis of Variance , 1958 .

[20]  S. S. Wilks The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses , 1938 .

[21]  Frans J Oort,et al.  Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices. , 2003, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[22]  I. Mechelen,et al.  Individual differences in situation-behavior profiles: A triple typology model , 1998 .

[23]  I. Mechelen,et al.  Implicit Taxonomy in Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Case Study , 1989 .