Machine vision assessment of mango orchard flowering

Abstract Machine vision assessment of mango orchard flowering involves detection of an inflorescence (a panicle) with flowers at various stages of development. Two systems were adopted contrasting in camera, illumination hardware and image processing. The image processing paths were: (i) colour thresholding of pixels followed by SVM classification to estimate inflorescence associated pixel number (panicle area), and panicle area relative to total canopy area (‘flowering intensity’) using two images per tree (‘dual view’), and (ii) a faster R-CNN for panicle detection, using either ‘dual-view’ or ‘multi-view’ tracking of panicles between consecutive images to achieve a panicle count per tree. The correlation coefficient of determination between the machine vision flowering intensity and area estimate (path i) and in field human visual counts of panicles (past ‘asparagus’ stage) per tree was 0.69 and 0.81, while that between the machine vision (path ii) and human panicle count per tree was 0.78 and 0.84 for the dual and multi-view detection approaches, respectively (n = 24), while that for repeat human counts was 0.86. The use of such information is illustrated in context of (i) monitoring the time of peak flowering based on repeated measures of flowering intensity, for use as the start date within heat sum models of fruit maturation, (ii) identification and mapping of early flowering trees to enable selective early harvest and (iii) exploring relationships between flowering and fruit yield. For the current orchard and season, the correlation coefficient of determination between machine vision estimates of panicle area and multi-view panicle count and fruit yield per tree was poor (R2 of 0.19 and 0.28, respectively, n = 44), indicative of variable fruit set per panicle and retention between trees.

[1]  D. Bochtis,et al.  Yield prediction in apple orchards based on image processing , 2011, Precision Agriculture.

[2]  W. S. Qureshi,et al.  Machine vision for counting fruit on mango tree canopies , 2017, Precision Agriculture.

[3]  José Blasco,et al.  Assessment of flower number per inflorescence in grapevine by image analysis under field conditions. , 2014, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[4]  Changki Mo,et al.  Design, integration, and field evaluation of a robotic apple harvester , 2017, J. Field Robotics.

[5]  Dennis Jarvis,et al.  Estimating mango crop yield using image analysis using fruit at 'stone hardening' stage and night time imaging , 2014 .

[6]  Margaret J. Mustard,et al.  Flower-Bud Formation and Development in Mangifera indica , 1946, Botanical Gazette.

[7]  Kerry B. Walsh,et al.  Machine vision in estimation of fruit crop yield , 2014 .

[8]  Thomas L. White,et al.  Evidence for a translocatable florigenic promoter in mango , 2006 .

[9]  P. J. Hofman,et al.  Postharvest technology and quarantine treatments. , 2009 .

[10]  Brijesh Verma,et al.  On-Tree Mango Fruit Size Estimation Using RGB-D Images , 2017, Sensors.

[11]  James Patrick Underwood,et al.  Image Based Mango Fruit Detection, Localisation and Yield Estimation Using Multiple View Geometry , 2016, Sensors.

[12]  Edward M. Barnes,et al.  Method for Using Images from a Color Digital Camera to Estimate Flower Number , 2000 .

[13]  S. Ninomiya,et al.  Automated characterization of flowering dynamics in rice using field-acquired time-series RGB images , 2015, Plant Methods.

[14]  Brane Širok,et al.  Flowering estimation in apple orchards by image analysis , 2013, Precision Agriculture.

[15]  Thomas L. Davenport,et al.  Flowering of mango trees in containers as influenced by seasonal temperature and water stress , 1994 .

[16]  Guy Shani,et al.  Detecting Tomato Flowers in Greenhouses Using Computer Vision , 2017 .

[17]  Salah Sukkarieh,et al.  Mapping almond orchard canopy volume, flowers, fruit and yield using lidar and vision sensors , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..