The metric matters: determining the extent of children's knowledge of morphological spelling regularities.

All developmental research needs to carefully consider how children's knowledge is measured. The study of children's knowledge of spelling conventions, or the ways in which the English orthography encodes the roots and affixes and the sounds in words, is no exception. This experiment examined the extent of 7- to 9-year-old children's knowledge of the role of root morphemes in spelling words across different contexts and with different units of assessment. Different writing contexts did not appear to affect children's performance; children were better able to spell the first components of two- than of one-morpheme words (e.g. only free in freely and freeze), both when writing whole words and their first sections (e.g. completing__ or __ly for freely). A second analysis revealed that the unit of coding can influence conclusions. Children demonstrated similar abilities across ages 7 to 9 when only the first segments of words were coded; in contrast, there was evidence of age-related differences when whole word spelling accuracy was assessed. In combination, these results suggest that children's knowledge of the principle of root consistency is remarkably robust to changes in writing context, but that coding is key when drawing conclusions. These findings remind us that the metric matters in studies of spelling, as in other domains, and they offer a manner to reconcile previously conflicting data on spelling development.

[1]  H. Rubin,et al.  Morphological Knowledge and Early Writing Ability , 1988, Language and speech.

[2]  R Treiman,et al.  What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. , 1994, Child development.

[3]  J. Piaget.  The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[4]  J. Carlisle.  An exploratory study of morphological errors in children's written stories , 1996 .

[5]  Carol L. Chomsky,et al.  Reading, Writing, and Phonology , 1970 .

[6]  Treiman and Cassar.  SPELLING ACQUISITION IN ENGLISH , 1997 .

[7]  C. Read,et al.  Children's Creative Spelling , 1986 .

[8]  Nenagh Kemp.  Children’s spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness , 2006 .

[9]  M. Fayol,et al.  From Learning to Teaching to Learning French Written Morphology , 1999 .

[10]  E. Spelke,et al.  Object permanence in five-month-old infants , 1985, Cognition.

[11]  P. Bryant,et al.  Morphological spelling strategies: developmental stages and processes. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[12]  C. Varnhagen,et al.  Is children's spelling naturally stage-like? , 1997 .

[13]  L. Feldman.  Beyond Orthography and Phonology: Differences between Inflections and Derivations , 1994 .

[14]  P. A. Villiers,et al.  A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  Joanne F. Carlisle,et al.  Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders , 1988, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[16]  P. Bryant,et al.  Learning Morphological and Phonological Spelling Rules: An Intervention Study , 2003 .

[17]  R. Treiman,et al.  The development of spelling skill. , 2000 .

[18]  Heather Fehring,et al.  The Teaching of Spelling. , 1984 .

[19]  Peter Bryant,et al.  This turnip's not for turning: Children's morphological awareness and their use of root morphemes in spelling , 2006 .

[20]  C M Sterling,et al.  Spelling errors in context. , 1983, British journal of psychology.

[21]  Isabelle Y. Liberman,et al.  Spelling Proficiency and Sensitivity to Word Structure. , 1985 .

[22]  C. Elbro,et al.  The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia , 1996, Annals of dyslexia.

[23]  P. Bryant,et al.  Getting to the root: young writers' sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived words , 2006, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  R. Treiman.  Beginning To Spell , 1993 .

[25]  P. Bryant,et al.  What young children do and do not know about the spelling of inflections and derivations. , 2005, Developmental science.

[26]  P. Bryant,et al.  Learning To Spell Regular and Irregular Verbs. , 1997 .

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[28]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .

[29]  Joanne F. Carlisle,et al.  The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students , 1987, Annals of dyslexia.

[30]  J Langer,et al.  The drawbridge phenomenon: representational reasoning or perceptual preference? , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[31]  Roger W. Brown,et al.  A First Language: The Early Stages , 1974 .

[32]  Peter Bryant,et al.  The strength of children's knowledge of the role of root morphemes in the spelling of derived words , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[33]  R. Treiman,et al.  Effects of Morphology on Children's Spelling of Final Consonant Clusters , 1996, Journal of experimental child psychology.