Modeling the Transport Sector: The Role of Existing Fuel Taxes in Climate Policy

Existing fuel taxes play a major role in determining the welfare effects of exempting the transportation sector from measures to control greenhouse gases. To study this phenomenon we modify the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model to disaggregate the household transportation sector. This improvement requires an extension of the GTAP data set that underlies the model. The revised and extended facility is then used to compare economic costs of cap-and-trade systems differentiated by sector, focusing on two regions: the USA where the fuel taxes are low, and Europe where the fuel taxes are high. We find that the interplay between carbon policies and pre-existing taxes leads to different results in these regions: in the USA exemption of transport from such a system would increase the welfare cost of achieving a national emissions target, while in Europe such exemptions will correct pre-existing distortions and reduce the cost.

[1]  Richard S. Eckaus,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model : revisions, sensitivities, and comparisons of results , 2001 .

[2]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Is International Emissions Trading Always Beneficial? , 2004 .

[3]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Disaggregating Household Transport in the MIT-EPPA Model , 2004 .

[4]  E. Helsing,et al.  Household budget surveys. , 1991, WHO regional publications. European series.

[5]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Emissions trading to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States : the McCain-Lieberman Proposal , 2003 .

[6]  Robert W. Crandall,et al.  THE EXTRA MILE. RETHINKING ENERGY POLICY FOR AUTOMOTIVE TRANSPORTATION , 1995 .

[7]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Annex I differentiation proposals : implications for welfare, equity and policy , 1997 .

[8]  D. Newbery.  Should Carbon Taxes Be Additional to Other Transport Fuel Taxes? , 1992 .

[9]  Sean Holly,et al.  Productivity and US Economic Growth. , 1990 .

[10]  Thomas Sterner,et al.  ANALYSING GASOLINE DEMAND ELASTICITIES: A SURVEY , 1991 .

[11]  Brooks B. Robinson,et al.  The National Income and Product Accounts , 2004 .

[12]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  CO2 Emissions Limits: Economic Adjustments and the Distribution of Burdens , 1997 .

[13]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The Cost of Kyoto Protocol Targets : The Case of Japan , 2004 .

[14]  I. Wing,et al.  Adjustment Time, Capital Malleability and Policy Cost , 1999 .

[15]  Robert McDougall,et al.  Global trade, assistance, and production : The GTAP 5 Data Base , 2002 .

[16]  J. Melillo,et al.  Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol , 1999, Nature.

[17]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Modeling non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Abatement , 2003 .

[18]  Soumodip Sarkar,et al.  Gasoline Tax as a Corrective Tax: Estimates for the United States, 1970-1991 , 1996 .

[19]  D. Graham,et al.  The Demand for Automobile Fuel A Survey of Elasticities , 2002 .

[20]  David L. Greene,et al.  Fuel Economy Rebound Effect for U.S. Household Vehicles , 1999, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[21]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Russia's Role in the Kyoto Protocol , 2003 .

[22]  Richard S. Eckaus,et al.  Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change The Effects of Changing Consumption Patterns on the Costs of Emission Restrictions , 2000 .

[23]  D. Chapman,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol, Cafe Standards, And Gasoline Taxes , 1999 .

[24]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Carbon Tax Differentiation in the European Union , 2003 .

[25]  Robert B. Archibald,et al.  A DECOMPOSITION OF THE PRICE AND INCOME ELASTICITY OF THE CONSUMER DEMAND FOR GASOLINE , 1981 .

[26]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Tax Distortions and Global Climate Policy , 2002 .