Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation

[1]  Bart Van Meerbeek,et al.  Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  K. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg,et al.  Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. , 2009, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  A. Çetin,et al.  One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. , 2009, Dental materials journal.

[4]  C. Davidson,et al.  Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  J. V. van Dijken,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of a low-shrinkage resin composite: a five-year evaluation. , 2009, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[6]  Salah Hasab Mahmoud,et al.  Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorative systems in posterior teeth. , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[7]  U. Pallesen,et al.  Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  K. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg,et al.  Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  Y. Korkmaz,et al.  Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[10]  K. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg,et al.  Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in Class II cavities. , 2006, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  Alessandra Reis,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[12]  C. Dörter,et al.  Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner. , 2006, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[13]  B. Willershausen,et al.  Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite , 2006, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[14]  R. Smales,et al.  Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years. , 2005, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  K. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg,et al.  A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in posterior cavities. , 2005, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[16]  J. Hodges,et al.  The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results. , 2004, Quintessence international.

[17]  H. Bodur,et al.  The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. , 2004, Operative dentistry.

[18]  Chih-Han Chang,et al.  Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations. , 2004, Operative dentistry.

[19]  M. Turgut,et al.  The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites. , 2004, Operative dentistry.

[20]  I. Andersson-Wenckert,et al.  Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. , 2004, American journal of dentistry.

[21]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites. , 2004, American journal of dentistry.

[22]  S. Mitra,et al.  An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[23]  M. Navarro,et al.  Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins: two-year results , 2003, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[24]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  Effect of low-viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. , 2003, American journal of dentistry.

[25]  B. Willershausen,et al.  Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner , 2003, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[26]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[27]  J. V. van Dijken,et al.  3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. , 2003, American journal of dentistry.

[28]  K. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg,et al.  A two-year clinical evaluation of a new calcium aluminate cement in Class II cavities , 2003, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[29]  C. Goracci,et al.  Sealing ability of packable resin composites in class II restorations. , 2003, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[30]  M. Aksu,et al.  Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[31]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[32]  M. Moss,et al.  Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[33]  B. Willershausen,et al.  Marginal integrity of different resin-based composites for posterior teeth: an in vitro dye-penetration study on eight resin-composite and compomer-/adhesive combinations with a particular look at the additional use of flow-composites. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[34]  M. Belcher,et al.  Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.

[35]  J. V. Dijken.  Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities. , 1999 .

[36]  Liebenberg Wh,et al.  Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": literature review and clinical recommendations. , 1999 .

[37]  B Van Meerbeek,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. , 1999, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[38]  K. Ferdianakis.  Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. , 1998, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[39]  A. Feilzer,et al.  Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. , 1997, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[40]  P. Alanen,et al.  The clinician's ability to identify caries risk subjects without saliva tests--a pilot study. , 1993, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[41]  H. Hausen,et al.  Past caries recordings made in Public Dental Clinics as predictors of caries prevalence in early adolescence. , 1989, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[42]  P. Hörstedt,et al.  Marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations placed with or without intermediate low-viscous resin. An SEM investigation. , 1987, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[43]  P. Hörstedt,et al.  Effect of the use of rubber dam versus cotton rolls on marginal adaptation of composite resin fillings to acid-etched enamel. , 1987, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.