Satellite discrimination from active and passive polarization signatures: simulation predictions using the TASAT satellite model

The Air Force Research Laboratory is interested in developing techniques for characterizing and discriminating satellites in Low and Geo-synchronous Earth Orbit (LEO and GEO). Certain materials used in constructing satellites possess unique polarization and wavelength dependent properties that may be useful for satellite discrimination and classification. In this work, we use the TASAT simulation to produce polarization renderings of detailed satellite models, with active and passive illumination, to predict polarization signatures of satellites in various Earth orbit scenarios. TASAT is a detailed tracking and controls simulation developed for modeling electro-optic tracking and imaging scenarios. Polarization renderings from passive illumination provide Stokes parameters representative of material polarization effects for the observed wavelength bands. Active illumination allows the incident polarization state to be changed. Thus, with suitable illuminating states and corresponding Stokes measurements, Mueller matrices may be formed from the active satellite returns, providing additional polarization signature information. Degree-of-polarization (DOP), diattenuation and retardance values calculated from the Stokes parameters and Mueuller matrices provide the polarization signature needed to test for satellite discrimination. We examine the variation of these polarization signatures for different satellite models situated in LEO and GEO observation scenarios. Signature variations for a visible and IR wavelength are considered. The results provide an indication of the feasibility of using material polarization properties for satellite discrimination to within the accuracy of our current materials database and polarization rendering capabilities.

[1]  Philippe Elies,et al.  Experimental investigation of the speckle polarization for a polished aluminium sample , 1997 .

[2]  Eusebio Bernabeu,et al.  Depolarization and polarization indices of an optical system , 1986 .

[3]  Eusebio Bernabeu,et al.  Obtainment of the polarizing and retardation parameters of a non-depolarizing optical system from the polar decomposition of its Mueller matrix , 1986 .

[4]  A. Kostinski Depolarization criterion for incoherent scattering. , 1992, Applied optics.

[5]  David G. Voelz,et al.  Polarization rendering for modeling of coherent polarized speckle backscatter using TASAT , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[6]  James F. Riker,et al.  Satellite Imaging Experiment tracking simulation results , 1994, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[7]  R. Simon The connection between Mueller and Jones matrices of polarization optics , 1982 .

[8]  R. Simon Mueller matrices and depolarization criteria , 1987 .

[9]  Matthew H. Smith,et al.  Polarization signatures of spherical and conical targets measured by Mueller matrix imaging polarimetry , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[10]  Keith A. Bush Simulating speckle polarization backscatter signatures from actively illuminated satellites , 1998, Remote Sensing.

[11]  J. Beard,et al.  Bidirectional Reflectance Model Validation and Utilization. , 1973 .

[12]  Russell A. Chipman Precision polarimetry of polarization components , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[13]  R. Chipman,et al.  Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition , 1996 .

[14]  B. Jeune,et al.  Optical media and target characterization by Mueller matrix decomposition , 1996 .

[15]  C. Givens,et al.  Constraints on Mueller matrices of polarization optics. , 1993, Applied optics.

[16]  Russell A. Chipman,et al.  Error analysis of a Mueller matrix polarimeter , 1990 .