Vortex Generators for a Normal Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction with a Downstream Diffuser

T HE interaction of a shock wavewith a turbulent boundary layer constitutes a fundamental problem of high-speed fluid mechanics. A detailed survey of past work on high-speed interactions has been carried out by Settles and Dolling [1] and Smits and Dussauge [2]. The shock interaction problem is particularly germane to the design of supersonic inlets. In such supersonic inlets, deceleration of the flow is achieved through a succession of oblique shock waves followed by a terminal normal shock. Boundary layers form on the inlet surfaces and interact with the shock system, giving rise to various shock/boundary-layer interactions (SBLIs). Each interaction of oblique/normal shock waves with the boundary layer causes stagnation pressure losses and downstream spatial distortions seen by the engine. An inlet must be carefully designed to minimize these losses and distortions during the compression process since they affect overall propulsion performance. In mixed-compression inlets, shock-induced separation can lead to engine unstart, which requires that the entire propulsion system undergo a restart sequence during flight. In external compression inlets, specifically axisymmetric configurations, a thick hubside boundary layer increases blockage and can decrease compressor performance. Thus, successfully controlling SBLIs has the potential to significantly improve supersonic inlet performance. As will be discussed in the following, various techniques of flow control for SBLIs have been proposed. However, it is often difficult to interpret the results because the flowfield may be too specific to an individual inlet configuration or too basic such that a relationship to inlet performance is not clear. To address this issue, a newwind-tunnel flowfield has been proposed [3] that captures much of the key shock boundary-layer interaction physics of supersonic external compression inlets. Thisflowfieldwill be used to study the novel flow control methods introduced herein. The conventionalflow control technique for SBLI conditions in an engine inlet employs a bleed of the boundary layer [4,5]. This bleed Presented as Paper 2010-4464 at the 40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, IL, 28 June–1 July 2010; received 31 January 2011; revision received 26 July 2011; accepted for publication 11 August 2011. Copyright©2011 by theAmerican Institute ofAeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 0748-4658/12 and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC. Ph.D. Candidate, Aerospace Engineering, 104 S. Wright Street. Member AIAA. Professor of Aerodynamics, Department of Engineering, Trumpington Street. Associate Fellow AIAA. Professor, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 122 Engineer’s Way. Associate Fellow AIAA. JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER Vol. 28, No. 1, January–February 2012

[1]  W. R. Hingst,et al.  Control of shock-wave boundary-layer interactions by bleed in supersonic mixed compression inlets , 1975 .

[2]  Philippe H. Geubelle,et al.  Simulation of aeroelastic mesoflaps for shock/boundary-layer interaction , 2002 .

[3]  V. Brunet,et al.  Control of Buffet Phenomenon on a Transonic Swept Wing , 2013 .

[4]  J. Dutton,et al.  Aerodynamics of recirculating flow control devices for normal shock/boundary-layer interactions , 2006 .

[5]  E. Loth Smart mesoflaps for control of shock boundary layer interactions , 2000 .

[6]  J. Dutton,et al.  Normal Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control Using Aeroelastic Mesoflaps , 2001 .

[7]  Donald C. Howe,et al.  Wind Tunnel Testing of an Axisymmetric Isentropic Relaxed External Compression Inlet at Mach 1.97 Design Speed , 2007 .

[8]  C. T. Or,et al.  Unsteadiness of the shock wave structure in attached and separated compression ramp flows , 1985 .

[9]  D. R. Smith,et al.  Separation shock dynamics in Mach 5 turbulent interactions induced by cylinders , 1989 .

[10]  B. H. Anderson,et al.  Optimal Control of Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions Using Micro-Array Actuation , 2006 .

[11]  T. Herges,et al.  Micro-vortex generators and recirculating flow control of normal shock stability and position sensitivity , 2010 .

[12]  Eric Loth,et al.  Control of an Oblique Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction with Aeroelastic Mesoflaps , 2002 .

[13]  L. A. Povinelli An Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Axisymmetric Diffusers , 1976 .

[14]  James L. Hunt,et al.  Design of a Hypersonic Waverider-Derived Airplane , 1993 .

[15]  H. Holden,et al.  Effect of Microvortex Generators On Seperated Normal Shock/ Boundary Layer Interactions , 2007 .

[16]  Donald C. Howe,et al.  Supersonic Inlet Shaping for Dramatic Reductions in Drag and Sonic Boom Strength , 2006 .

[17]  A. C. Brown,et al.  Subsonic diffusers designed integrally with vortex generators. , 1968 .

[18]  Srinivasan Raghunathan,et al.  Passive control of shock-boundary layer interaction , 1988 .

[19]  Alexander J. Smits,et al.  Turbulent Shear Layers in Supersonic Flow , 1996 .

[20]  Timothy R. Conners,et al.  The Feasibility of High-Flow Nacelle Bypass for Low Sonic Boom Propulsion System Design , 2011 .

[21]  John Fulker,et al.  Research at DERA on sub boundary layer vortex generators (SBVGs) , 2001 .

[22]  Jean-Paul Dussauge,et al.  Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with separation , 2006 .

[23]  L. Brusniak,et al.  Separation shock motion in fin, cylinder, and compression ramp - Induced turbulent interactions , 1987 .

[24]  E. Loth,et al.  Vortex Generators for a Dual-Stream Low-Boom Inlet , 2011 .

[25]  E. Loth,et al.  A Representative Flowfield of External Compression Inlets and Diffusers , 2009 .

[26]  Mehmet Erengil,et al.  Unsteady wave structure near separation in a Mach 5 compression rampinteraction , 1991 .

[27]  Timothy R. Conners,et al.  Experimental Investigation of a Large-Scale Low-Boom Inlet Concept , 2011 .

[28]  C. F. Coe,et al.  Pressure fluctuations underlying attached and separated supersonic turbulent boundary layers and shock waves. , 1973 .

[29]  D. Mccormick,et al.  Shock/boundary-layer interaction control with vortex generators and passive cavity , 1993 .

[30]  William Murphy,et al.  The application of sub-boundary layer vortex generators to reduce canopy 'Mach rumble' interior noise on the Gulfstream III , 1987 .

[31]  E. Loth,et al.  Canonical Normal Shock Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Flows Relevant to External Compression Inlets , 2013 .

[32]  Eric Loth,et al.  Microramps Upstream of an Oblique-Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction , 2010 .

[33]  Holger Babinsky,et al.  Microvortex Generators Applied to Flowfield Containing a Normal Shock Wave and Diffuser , 2011 .

[34]  E. Loth,et al.  Normal shock boundary layer control with various vortex generator geometries , 2011 .

[35]  Flint O. Thomas,et al.  On the mechanism of unsteady shock oscillation in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions , 1994 .

[36]  Holger Babinsky,et al.  Shock wave/boundary-layer interaction control using a combination of vortex generators and bleed , 2013 .

[37]  Jean Delery,et al.  Shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction and its control , 1985 .