Detection and Discrimination of Mixed Odor Strands in Overlapping Plumes Using an Insect-Antenna-Based Chemosensor System

Olfactory signals, a major means of communication in insects, travel in the form of turbulent odor plumes. In terrestrial environments, an odor blend emitted from a single point source exists in every strand of the plume, whereas, in confluent plumes from two different odor sources, the strands have some chance of being coincident and comprising a new third odor in those strands. Insects have the ability to detect and interpret necessary olfactory information from individual filamentous odor strands in complex multifilament odor plumes. However, behaviorists have had no way to measure the stimulus situations they are presenting to their temporally acute insect subjects when performing Y-tube olfactometer or confluent pheromone plume wind tunnel assays. We have successfully measured the degree of plume-strand mixing in confluent plumes in a wind tunnel by using a multichannel insect-antenna-based chemosensor. A PC-based computer algorithm to analyze antennal signals from the probe portion of the system performed real-time signal processing and, following a short training session, classified individual odorant/mixture strands at sub-second temporal resolution and a few tens of millimeters of spatial resolution. In our studies, the chemosensor classified a higher frequency of strands of two different odorants emitted from two closely spaced filter papers as being “mixed” when the sources were located only 1 or 2 cm apart than when the sources were 5 or 10 cm apart. These experiments demonstrate the chemosensor’s potential to be used for measuring odor stimulus situations in more complex multiple-plume environments.

[1]  K. Haynes,et al.  Filamentous nature of pheromone plumes protects integrity of signal from background chemical noise in cabbage looper moth,Trichoplusia ni , 1992, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[2]  T. Baker,et al.  Real-time odor discrimination using a bioelectronic sensor array based on the insect electroantennogram , 2008, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[3]  T. Baker,et al.  Chemical communication in heliothine moths. VII. Correlation between diminished responses to point-source plumes and single filaments similarly tainted with a behavioral antagonist , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  Ring T. Cardé,et al.  Antennal resolution of pulsed pheromone plumes in three moth species. , 2002, Journal of insect physiology.

[5]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  Pattern Recognition: From Classical to Modern Approaches , 2001 .

[6]  A portable electroantennogram sensor for routine measurements of pheromone concentrations in greenhouses , 1998 .

[7]  T. Baker,et al.  Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code , 2001, Nature.

[8]  Ryohei Kanzaki,et al.  Synthesis of the pheromone-oriented behaviour of silkworm moths by a mobile robot with moth antennae as pheromone sensors1This paper was presented at the Fifth World Congress on Biosensors, Berlin, Germany, 3–5 June 1998.1 , 1999 .

[9]  Thomas C. Baker,et al.  Field and laboratory electroantennographic measurements of pheromone plume structure correlated with oriental fruit moth behaviour , 1989 .

[10]  J. Visser,et al.  Olfactory antennal responses to plant volatiles in apterous virginoparae of the vetch aphid Megoura viciae , 1995 .

[11]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[12]  T. Baker,et al.  Moth uses fine tuning for odour resolution , 1998, Nature.

[13]  W. Leal,et al.  Peripheral Coding of Sex Pheromone and a Behavioral Antagonist in the Japanese Beetle, Popillia japonica , 2002, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[14]  J. Hardie,et al.  Perception of volatiles associated with sex and food by different adult forms of the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae , 1994 .

[15]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[16]  U. Koch,et al.  Detection of volatiles released by diseased potato tubers using a biosensor on the basis of intact insect antennae , 1999 .

[17]  T. Baker,et al.  MaleHeliothis virescens maintain upwind flight in response to experimentally pulsed filaments of their sex pheromone (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) , 1992, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[18]  P. Witzgall,et al.  Wind-tunnel study on attraction inhibitor in maleColeophora laricella Hbn. (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) , 1991, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[19]  W. J. Harper,et al.  Application of an electronic nose to correlate with descriptive sensory analysis of aged Cheddar cheese , 2003 .

[20]  T. Baker,et al.  Host plant volatiles synergize responses of sex pheromone-specific olfactory receptor neurons in male Helicoverpa zea , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  A.J. Myrick,et al.  Bioelectronic Artificial Nose Using Four-Channel Moth Antenna Biopotential Recordings , 2005, Conference Proceedings. 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2005..

[22]  A. Cossé,et al.  Fine-scale resolution of closely spaced pheromone and antagonist filaments by flying male Helicoverpa zea , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  T. Krishnan,et al.  IMPERFECT SUPERVISION IN STATISTICAL PATTERN RECOGNITION , 2001 .

[24]  T. Baker,et al.  Chemical communication in heliothine moths , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[25]  J. Hardie,et al.  An improved aphid electroantennogram. , 1998, Journal of insect physiology.

[26]  H E Hummel,et al.  Insect-based BioFETs with improved signal characteristics. , 1999, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[27]  Thomas C. Baker,et al.  Odor discrimination using a hybrid-device olfactory biosensor , 2003, First International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2003. Conference Proceedings..

[28]  Julie L. Todd,et al.  Function of Peripheral Olfactory Organs , 1999 .

[29]  Glen C. Rains,et al.  LIMITS OF VOLATILE CHEMICAL DETECTION OF A PARASITOID WASP, Microplitis croceipes, AND AN ELECTRONIC NOSE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY , 2004 .

[30]  Uwe T. Koch,et al.  A portable EAG system for the measurement of pheromone concentrations in the field , 1992 .

[31]  Bill S Hansson,et al.  Extreme sensitivity in an olfactory system. , 2003, Chemical senses.

[32]  Peter Kordos,et al.  A BIOFET ON THE BASIS OF INTACT INSECT ANTENNAE , 1998 .

[33]  D R Walt,et al.  Optical sensor arrays for odor recognition. , 1998, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[34]  Michael J. Schöning,et al.  The Use of Insect Chemoreceptors for the Assembly of Biosensors Based on Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors , 2000 .

[35]  T. Baker,et al.  Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Junwei Zhu,et al.  Odor discrimination using insect electroantennogram responses from an insect antennal array. , 2002, Chemical senses.

[37]  M. Huotari,et al.  Blowfly olfactory biosensor's sensitivity and specificity , 1996 .

[38]  N. Vickers Winging it: moth flight behavior and responses of olfactory neurons are shaped by pheromone plume dynamics. , 2006, Chemical senses.

[39]  Isao Shimoyama,et al.  A Pheromone-Guided Mobile Robot that Behaves like a Silkworm Moth with Living Antennae as Pheromone Sensors , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[40]  B. Hansson,et al.  Chemical communication in heliothine moths , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[41]  C. Loudon,et al.  Electroantennographic resolution of pulsed pheromone plumes in two species of moths with bipectinate antennae. , 2005, Chemical senses.

[42]  A. S. French,et al.  Dynamic properties of antennal responses to pheromone in two moth species. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  E. Schaller,et al.  ‘Electronic Noses’ and Their Application to Food , 1998 .

[44]  J. Hardie,et al.  The aphids' peripheral perception of plant volatiles , 1996 .

[45]  P. Burrows,et al.  Quantification of electroantennogram responses of the primary rhinaria ofAcyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) to C4-C8 primary alcohols and aldehydes , 1994, Journal of Chemical Ecology.