Motor unit number estimation using high-density surface electromyography

OBJECTIVE To present a motor unit number estimation (MUNE) technique that resolves alternation by means of high-density surface EMG. METHODS High-density surface EMG, using 120 EMG channels simultaneously, is combined with elements of the increment counting technique (ICT) and the multiple-point stimulation technique. Alternation is a major drawback in the ICT. The spatial and temporal information provided by high-density surface EMG support identification and elimination of the effects of alternation. We determined the MUNE and its reproducibility in 14 healthy subjects, using a grid of 8 x 15 small electrodes on the thenar muscles. RESULTS Mean MUNE was 271+/-103 (retest: 290+/-109), with a coefficient of variation of 22% and an intra-class correlation of 0.88. On average, 22 motor unit potentials (MUPs) were collected per subject. The representativity of this MUP sample was quantitatively assessed using the spatiotemporal information provided by high-density recordings. CONCLUSIONS MUNE values are relatively high, because we were able to detect many small MUPs. Reproducibility was similar to that of other MUNE techniques. SIGNIFICANCE Our technique allows collection of a large MUP sample non-invasively by resolving alternation to a large extent and provides insight into the representativity of this sample. The large sample size is expected to increase MUNE accuracy.

[1]  Mb Alan J. McComas Dr.,et al.  Invited review: motor unit estimation: methods, results, and present status. , 1991 .

[2]  Clifton L Gooch,et al.  Motor unit number estimation. , 2003, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[3]  W. Brown,et al.  Methods for estimating numbers of motor units in biceps‐brachialis muscles and losses of motor units with aging , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  J. H. Ward.  Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[5]  Dick F Stegeman,et al.  Motor unit action potential topography and its use in motor unit number estimation , 2005, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  A N Pettitt,et al.  The stimulus–response curve and motor unit variability in normal subjects and subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2006, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  M. Bromberg.  Motor unit estimation: Reproducibility of the spike‐triggered averaging technique in normal and ALS subjects , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  P J Delwaide,et al.  Number and relative size of thenar motor units estimated by an adapted multiple point stimulation method , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[9]  M J Campbell,et al.  Electrophysiological estimation of the number of motor units within a human muscle , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  T J Doherty,et al.  Determinants of mean motor unit size: Impact on estimates of motor unit number , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[11]  A. McComas,et al.  The numbers and relative sizes of motor units estimated by Computer , 1991, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  C Hershler,et al.  Motor unit number estimation: Sample size considerations , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  Jeremy M. Shefner,et al.  Motor unit number estimation in human neurological diseases and animal models , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Magnetic stimulation‐induced modulations of motor unit firings extracted from multi‐channel surface EMG , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  D F Stegeman,et al.  A thin, flexible multielectrode grid for high-density surface EMG. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  Bert U Kleine,et al.  Using two-dimensional spatial information in decomposition of surface EMG signals. , 2007, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  Daniel W Stashuk,et al.  Motor unit number estimation by decomposition‐enhanced spike‐triggered averaging: Control data, test–retest reliability, and contractile level effects , 2004, Muscle & nerve.

[19]  J R Daube,et al.  Estimating the Number of Motor Units in a Muscle , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[20]  Gea Drost,et al.  A high-density multichannel surface electromyography system for the characterization of single motor units , 2002 .

[21]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  High-Resolution Alignment of Sampled Waveforms , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Inge Zijdewind,et al.  Motor unit activation order during electrically evoked contractions of paralyzed or partially paralyzed muscles , 2002, Muscle & nerve.

[23]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Motor unit number estimates based on the automated analysis of F‐responses , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[24]  W. Brown,et al.  The estimated numbers and relative sizes of thenar motor units as selected by multiple point stimulation in young and older adults , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[25]  W F Brown,et al.  Multiple point electrical stimulation of ulnar and median nerves. , 1976, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[26]  W F Brown,et al.  Some electrical properties of motor units and their effects on the methods of estimating motor unit numbers. , 1976, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[27]  Use of the collision technique to improve the accuracy of motor unit number estimation , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  H. S. Gasser,et al.  Electrical Signs of Nervous Activity , 1937 .

[29]  D. Stegeman,et al.  The motor unit potential distribution over the skin surface and its use in estimating the motor unit location. , 1997, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[30]  Mark B. Bromberg,et al.  Updating motor unit number estimation (MUNE) , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  Kwang-Woo Lee,et al.  Reproducibility of statistical motor unit number estimates in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Comparisons between size‐ and number‐weighted modifications , 2004, Muscle & nerve.