Mapping the quality assurance of teaching and learning in higher education: the emergence of a specialty?

AbstarctThe quality assurance of teaching and learning as part of universities’ governance and quality management has become a major subject in higher education and higher education politics worldwide. In addition, increasing academic attention has been paid to the quality assurance of teaching and learning, as is evident from the growing number of articles in specific journals of higher education. This paper maps the development and content of research in the literature regarding the quality assurance of teaching and learning. For this mapping, a bibliometric analysis of 1610 articles from 399 different journals from 1996 to 2013 was performed using SCOPUS. The aim of this mapping is to answer the following research question: Has the quality assurance of teaching and learning become a research specialty? A co-citation analysis identifies the following four thematic clusters: an Assessment-Cluster, a Quality-Cluster, a Quality-Management-Cluster and a Student-Evaluation-of-Teaching-Cluster. Based on a categorization of the literature’s core content, two distinct views on the quality assurance of teaching and learning become evident, representing an antagonistic tension in the research between an education strand and a management strand of research. Several indications from the empirical evidence in this paper suggest that the quality assurance of teaching and learning is (becoming) a specialty. The identification and awareness of a specialty as a cognitive organizing characteristic combining two and more categories of research topics are of great importance for the creation of knowledge in the complex interdisciplinary research field of higher education.

[1]  D. Sadler.  Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal , 2010 .

[2]  Nicholas C. Mullins,et al.  The Development of Specialties in Social Science: The Case of Ethnomethodology , 1973 .

[3]  J. Brennan,et al.  Quality assessment and institutional change: Experiences from 14 countries , 2000 .

[4]  A. Donabedian.  An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Health Care , 2002 .

[5]  Dennis C. S. Law,et al.  Quality assurance in post‐secondary education , 2010 .

[6]  J. Huisman,et al.  An in‐depth study on the impact of external quality assurance , 2011 .

[7]  Lynne Eagle,et al.  Are students customers? TQM and marketing perspectives , 2007 .

[8]  L. Langbein.  Management by Results: Student Evaluation of Faculty Teaching and the Mis-Measurement of Performance. , 2008 .

[9]  B. Stensaker,et al.  Quality Management in Higher Education: Towards a Better Understanding of an Emerging Field , 2010 .

[10]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Alex De Visscher.  A new Price’s estimate on the size of scientific specialties based on scientific community structure , 2012, Scientometrics.

[12]  S. C. Bradford DSc,et al.  CLASSIC PAPER: Sources of Information on Specific Subjects , 1976 .

[13]  Gopal K. Kanji,et al.  Total quality management in UK higher education institutions , 1999 .

[14]  K. C. Johnson,et al.  Hot or Not: Do Professors Perceived as Physically Attractive Receive Higher Student Evaluations? , 2006, The Journal of general psychology.

[15]  S. Morris,et al.  Mapping research specialties , 2008 .

[16]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Journal of Informetrics , 2022 .

[17]  Everard van Kemenade,et al.  More Value to Defining Quality , 2008 .

[18]  Howard D. White,et al.  Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure , 1981, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[19]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[20]  S. Barrie,et al.  Students’ perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: the perspective of currently enrolled students , 2007 .

[21]  D. Houston.  TQM and Higher Education: A Critical Systems Perspective on Fitness for Purpose , 2007 .

[22]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[23]  Joseph B. Berger,et al.  Rankings, accreditation, and the international quest for quality , 2014 .

[24]  S. Venkatraman.  A framework for implementing TQM in higher education programs , 2007 .

[25]  K. Brad Wray.  Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate , 2009, Scientometrics.

[26]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications , 2001 .

[27]  Mieke Brekelmans,et al.  Quality requirements for teacher educators , 2005 .

[28]  Gaston Heimeriks,et al.  Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study , 2006, Scientometrics.

[29]  J. Stachowiak.  Ulrich Bröckling, The entrepreneurial self. Fabricating a new type of subject, Sage Publications , 2016 .

[30]  H. Brian Hwarng,et al.  Translating customers’ voices into operations requirements ‐ A QFD application in higher education , 2001 .

[31]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[32]  Carol L. Colbeck,et al.  Developing Performance Indicators for Assessing Classroom Teaching Practices and Student Learning , 2001 .

[33]  David Kember,et al.  Implications for evaluation from a study of students' perceptions of good and poor teaching , 2000 .

[34]  Barbara Sporn,et al.  Quality assurance in Europe and the U.S.: Professional and political economic framing of higher education policy , 2002 .

[35]  Jacqueline Douglas,et al.  The development of a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their experience in higher education , 2008 .

[36]  Ulrich Bröckling.  The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject , 2015 .

[37]  D. Sluijsmans,et al.  The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review , 1999 .

[38]  Hans-Dieter Daniel,et al.  Data sources for performing citation analysis: an overview , 2008, J. Documentation.

[39]  Gina Anderson,et al.  Assuring Quality/Resisting Quality Assurance: Academics’ responses to ‘quality’ in some Australian universities , 2006 .

[40]  Philip Banyard,et al.  The Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education: Love me, love my lectures? , 2000 .

[41]  Peter Weingart,et al.  Die Vermessung der Forschung. Theorie und Praxis der Wissenschaftsindikatoren , 1984 .

[42]  David Billing,et al.  International comparisons and trends in external quality assurance of higher education: Commonality or diversity? , 2004 .

[43]  A. Bonaccorsi.  Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science , 2008 .

[44]  J. Gill,et al.  MANAGEMENT BY PANACEA: ACCOUNTING FOR TRANSIENCE , 1993 .

[45]  Malcolm Tight.  Researching Higher Education , 2003 .

[46]  Rick Vogel.  The Visible Colleges of Management and Organization Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Journals , 2012 .

[47]  Fred A. Koslowski.  Quality and assessment in context: a brief review , 2006 .

[48]  S. Bradford.  "Sources of information on specific subjects" by S.C. Bradford , 1985 .

[49]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[50]  U. Teichler.  Research on Higher Education in Europe. , 2005 .

[51]  D. Carless,et al.  Developing sustainable feedback practices , 2011 .

[52]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[53]  E. Grady Bogue,et al.  Quality Assurance in Higher Education: The Evolution of Systems and Design Ideals , 1998 .

[54]  Charles F. Eiszler.  College Students' Evaluations of Teaching and Grade Inflation , 2002 .

[55]  J. Budd,et al.  Higher Education Literature Revisited: Citation Patterns Examined , 2010 .

[56]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field , 2009 .

[57]  Donald F. Westerheijden,et al.  Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education , 1994 .

[58]  Masood Fooladi,et al.  A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases , 2013, ArXiv.

[59]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education , 2005 .

[60]  P. J. Wells,et al.  Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions , 2007 .

[61]  Francisco Zabaleta,et al.  The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching , 2007 .

[62]  L. Harvey.  Impact of Quality Assurance: Overview of a discussion between representatives of external quality assurance agencies , 2006 .

[63]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories , 2012, Scientometrics.

[64]  Maureen Brookes,et al.  Evaluating quality management in university departments , 2006 .

[65]  K. K. Cetina.  Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , 1999 .