The Drivers of Academic Success in Cleft and Craniofacial Centers: A 10-Year Analysis of over 2000 Publications

Background: Cleft and craniofacial centers require significant investment by medical institutions, yet variables contributing to their academic productivity remain unknown. This study characterizes the elements associated with high academic productivity in these centers. Methods: The authors analyzed cleft and craniofacial centers accredited by the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. Variables such as university affiliation; resident training; number of plastic surgery, oral-maxillofacial, and dental faculty; and investment in a craniofacial surgery, craniofacial orthodontics fellowship program, or both, were obtained. Craniofacial and cleft-related research published between July of 2005 and June of 2015 was identified. A stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to measure outcomes of total publications, summative impact factor, basic science publications, total journals, and National Institutes of Health funding. Results: One hundred sixty centers were identified, comprising 920 active faculty, 34 craniofacial surgery fellowships, and eight craniofacial orthodontic fellowships; 2356 articles were published in 191 journals. Variables most positively associated with a high number of publications were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (&bgr; = 0.608), craniofacial surgery fellowships (&bgr; = 0.231), number of plastic surgery faculty (&bgr; = 0.213), and university affiliation (&bgr; = 0.165). Variables most positively associated with high a number of journals were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (&bgr; = 0.550), university affiliation (&bgr; = 0.251), number of plastic surgery faculty (&bgr; = 0.230), and craniofacial surgery fellowship (&bgr; = 0.218). Variables most positively associated with a high summative impact factor were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (&bgr; = 0.648), craniofacial surgery fellowship (&bgr; = 0.208), number of plastic surgery faculty (&bgr; = 0.207), and university affiliation (&bgr; = 0.116). Variables most positively associated with basic science publications were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (&bgr; = 0.676) and craniofacial surgery fellowship (&bgr; = 0.208). The only variable associated with National Institutes of Health funding was craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowship (&bgr; = 0.332). Conclusion: Participation in both craniofacial surgery and orthodontics fellowships demonstrates the strongest association with academic success; craniofacial surgery fellowship, university affiliation, and number of surgeons are also predictive.

[1]  W. G. Stevens,et al.  A Comparison of Research Productivity Across Plastic Surgery Fellowship Directors. , 2016, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[2]  J. May,et al.  Does Formal Research Training Lead to Academic Success in Plastic Surgery? A Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Academic Plastic Surgeons. , 2016, Journal of surgical education.

[3]  J. Serletti,et al.  The Impact of National Institutes of Health Funding on Scholarly Productivity in Academic Plastic Surgery , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  P. Cederna,et al.  Successfully Integrating Research into Plastic Surgery Training Programs , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[5]  N. Valsangkar,et al.  Have the New Training Pathways Enhanced Academic Productivity in Plastic Surgery? , 2015, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[6]  D. Murray,et al.  The 50 Most Cited Papers in Craniofacial Anomalies and Craniofacial Surgery , 2015, Archives of plastic surgery.

[7]  R. Choa,et al.  A worldwide bibliometric analysis of published literature in plastic and reconstructive surgery. , 2015, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[8]  Bradford J. Kim,et al.  Determining the Drivers of Academic Success in Surgery: An Analysis of 3,850 Faculty , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  J. Fearon,et al.  Craniofacial Fellowship Training: Where Are We Now? , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  The Impact of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: By the Numbers , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  Z. Gugala,et al.  A Dedicated Research Program Increases the Quantity and Quality of Orthopaedic Resident Publications , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J. Waljee,et al.  Bibliometric Indices and Academic Promotion within Plastic Surgery , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  V. Prasad,et al.  US News and World Report Cancer Hospital Rankings: Do They Reflect Measures of Research Productivity? , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  Eric E. Adelman,et al.  Influence of Training Institution on Academic Affiliation and Productivity among Plastic Surgery Faculty in the United States , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  Medha Joshi,et al.  Bibliometric indicators for evaluating the quality of scientifc publications. , 2014, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[16]  John J. Coleman,et al.  Academic Plastic Surgery: Faculty Recruitment and Retention , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  J. Bradley,et al.  Evaluation of Plastic Surgery Training Programs: Integrated/Combined versus Independent , 2012, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  M. Kon,et al.  Plastic Surgery Classics: Characteristics of 50 Top-Cited Articles in Four Plastic Surgery Journals since 1946 , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  M. Rabkin A paradigm shift in academic medicine? , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[20]  Robert Kevin Grigsby,et al.  Perspective: Recognizing and rewarding clinical scholarship. , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.