The effect of different cardiovascular risk presentation formats on intentions, understanding and emotional affect: a randomised controlled trial using a web-based risk formatter (protocol)

BackgroundThe future risk of heart disease can be predicted with increasing precision. However, more research is needed into how this risk is conveyed and presented. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of presenting cardiovascular risk in different formats on individuals' intention to change behaviour to reduce risk, understanding of risk information and emotional affect.Methods/designA randomised controlled trial comprising four arms, with a between subjects design will be performed. There will be two intervention groups and two control groups. The first control comprises a pre-intervention questionnaire and presents risk in a bar graph format. The second control presents risk in a bar graph format without pre-intervention questionnaire. These two control groups are to account for the potential Hawthorne effect of thinking about cardiovascular risk before viewing actual risk. The two intervention groups comprise presenting risk in either a pictogram or metonym format (image depicting seriousness of having a myocardial infarction). 800 individuals' aged between 45 and 64 years, who have not been previously diagnosed with heart disease and have access to a computer with internet, will be given a link to a website comprising a risk calculator and electronic questionnaires. 10-year risk of having a coronary heart disease event will be assessed and presented in one of the three formats. A post-intervention questionnaire will be completed after viewing the risk format. Main outcome measures are (i) intention to change behaviour, (ii) understanding of risk information, (iii) emotional affect and (iv) worry about future heart disease. Secondary outcomes are the sub-components of the theory of planned behaviour: attitudes, perceived behavioural control and subjective norms.DiscussionHaving reviewed the literature, we are not aware of any other studies which have used the assessment of actual risk, in a trial to compare different graphical cardiovascular risk presentation formats. This trial will provide data about which graphical cardiovascular risk presentation format is most effective in encouraging behaviour change to reduce cardiovascular risk.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN91319318

[1]  Michael W. Eysenck,et al.  Worry: Mechanisms and Modulating Influences , 1994, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2 , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Presenting risk information--a review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes. , 2001, Journal of health communication.

[4]  Erika A. Waters.  Feeling good, feeling bad, and feeling at‐risk: a review of incidental affect's influence on likelihood estimates of health hazards and life events , 2008 .

[5]  J. Paling.  Strategies to help patients understand risks , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  M. Becker,et al.  The Health Belief Model: A Decade Later , 1984, Health education quarterly.

[7]  A. Neugut,et al.  Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[8]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers , 2004 .

[9]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[10]  S. J,et al.  Distinctions Between Worry and Perceived Risk in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2008 .

[11]  P. Slovic,et al.  Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. , 2007, Health affairs.

[12]  K. Mccaul,et al.  Does worry about breast cancer predict screening behaviors? A meta-analysis of the prospective evidence. , 2006, Preventive medicine.

[13]  J. G. Adair,et al.  The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. , 1984 .

[14]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  V. Reyna,et al.  A Theory of Medical Decision Making and Health: Fuzzy Trace Theory , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[16]  Noel T Brewer,et al.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. , 2007, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[17]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[18]  B. Trock,et al.  Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. , 1991, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[19]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Barriers to implementing cardiovascular risk tables in routine general practice , 2004, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[20]  W. Velicer,et al.  The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[21]  France Légaré,et al.  Using decision aids in community-based primary care: a theory-driven evaluation with ethnically diverse patients. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[22]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[23]  P. Ubel,et al.  The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[24]  I. Lipkus.  Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[25]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  J. Epping-Jordan,et al.  Preventing chronic diseases: taking stepwise action , 2005, The Lancet.

[27]  E. Thompson.  Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) , 2007 .

[28]  I. Ajzen.  Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations , 2002 .

[29]  K. Mccaul,et al.  The Effects of Warning Smokers on Perceived Risk, Worry, and Motivation to Quit , 2009, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[30]  C. McHorney,et al.  Frequency or Probability? A Qualitative Study of Risk Communication Formats Used in Health Care , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[31]  Arch G Mainous,et al.  A coronary heart disease risk score based on patient-reported information. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  N. Weinstein.  What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[33]  M. Hankins,et al.  The impact of genetic testing for Crohn's disease, risk magnitude and graphical format on motivation to stop smoking: an experimental analogue study , 2008, Clinical genetics.

[34]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[35]  Melanie Price,et al.  Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[36]  Lidewij Henneman,et al.  Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[37]  Kim Witte,et al.  Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. , 1996 .

[38]  M. Conner,et al.  The theory of planned behaviour and health behaviours. , 1996 .

[39]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  What are effective strategies to communicate cardiovascular risk information to patients? A systematic review. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[40]  G. Kok,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of its Applications to Health-Related Behaviors , 1996, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[41]  M. Conner,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2004 .

[42]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[43]  K. Mccaul,et al.  The motivational effects of thinking and worrying about the effects of smoking cigarettes , 2007 .

[44]  M. Pencina,et al.  General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study , 2008, Circulation.

[45]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making , 2007 .

[46]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. , 2003, European heart journal.

[47]  Melanie Giles,et al.  Measuring young people's attitudes to breastfeeding using the Theory of Planned Behaviour. , 2007, Journal of public health.

[48]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[49]  Ben van Steenkiste,et al.  Patients' ideas, fears and expectations of their coronary risk: barriers for primary prevention. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[50]  Victor J. Strecher,et al.  Do cigarette smokers have unrealistic perceptions of their heart attack, cancer, and stroke risks? , 1995, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[51]  Karim S. Kassam,et al.  Future anhedonia and time discounting , 2008 .

[52]  E Rukholm,et al.  "Sneaky disease": the body and health knowledge for people at risk for coronary heart disease in Ontario, Canada. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[53]  Carol Emslie,et al.  ‘I’d rather go with a heart attack than drag on’: lay images of heart disease and the problems they present for primary and secondary prevention , 2001 .

[54]  J. Constans,et al.  Worry propensity and the perception of risk. , 2001, Behaviour research and therapy.

[55]  A. Lloyd,et al.  The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[56]  Anthony J Viera,et al.  The effect of giving global coronary risk information to adults: a systematic review. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.