Aerodynamic force generation, performance and control of body orientation during gliding in sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps)

SUMMARY Gliding has often been discussed in the literature as a possible precursor to powered flight in vertebrates, but few studies exist on the mechanics of gliding in living animals. In this study I analyzed the 3D kinematics of sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps) during short glides in an enclosed space. Short segments of the glide were captured on video, and the positions of marked anatomical landmarks were used to compute linear distances and angles, as well as whole body velocities and accelerations. From the whole body accelerations I estimated the aerodynamic forces generated by the animals. I computed the correlations between movements of the limbs and body rotations to examine the control of orientation during flight. Finally, I compared these results to those of my earlier study on the similarly sized and distantly related southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans). The sugar gliders in this study accelerated downward slightly (1.0±0.5 m s–2), and also accelerated forward (2.1±0.6 m s–2) in all but one trial, indicating that the body weight was not fully supported by aerodynamic forces and that some of the lift produced forward acceleration rather than just balancing body weight. The gliders used high angles of attack (44.15±3.12°), far higher than the angles at which airplane wings would stall, yet generated higher lift coefficients (1.48±0.18) than would be expected for a stalled wing. Movements of the limbs were strongly correlated with body rotations, suggesting that sugar gliders make extensive use of limb movements to control their orientation during gliding flight. In addition, among individuals, different limb movements were associated with a given body rotation, suggesting that individual variation exists in the control of body rotations. Under similar conditions, flying squirrels generated higher lift coefficients and lower drag coefficients than sugar gliders, yet had only marginally shallower glides. Flying squirrels have a number of morphological specializations not shared by sugar gliders that may help to explain their greater lift generating performance.

[1]  W J Bock,et al.  The role of adaptive mechanisms in the origin of higher levels of organization. , 1965, Systematic zoology.

[2]  References , 1971 .

[3]  Jane L. Johnson-Murray.  Myology of the gliding membranes of some petauristine rodents genera glaucomys pteromys petinomys and petaurista , 1977 .

[4]  B. Clark.  Energetics of Hovering Flight and the Origin of Bats , 1977 .

[5]  James Dale Smith.  Comments on Flight and the Evolution of Bats , 1977 .

[6]  N.A.V. Piercy,et al.  Aerodynamics for Engineers , 1979 .

[7]  Kevin Padian.  Running, Leaping, Lifting Off , 1982 .

[8]  Russell P. Balda,et al.  The Physics of Leaping Animals and the Evolution of Preflight , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Ulla M. Norberg,et al.  Evolution of Vertebrate Flight: An Aerodynamic Model for the Transition from Gliding to Active Flight , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Jl Johnson-Murray.  The Comparative Myology of the Gliding Membranes of Acrobates, Petauroides and Petaurus Contrasted With the Cutaneous Myology of Hemibelideus and Pseudocheirus (Marsupialia, Phalangeridae) and With Selected Gliding Rodentia (Sciuridae and Anamoluridae) , 1987 .

[11]  M. Koehl,et al.  THE INTERACTION OF BEHAVIORAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE IN THE EVOLUTION OF A NOVEL LOCOMOTOR TYPE: “FLYING” FROGS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  Chris Chatfield,et al.  The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction , 1990 .

[13]  P. A. Blight.  The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction , 1991 .

[14]  M. Kurohmaru,et al.  Functional anatomy of gliding membrane muscles in the sugar glider (Petaurus breviceps). , 1998, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[15]  Stephen M. Jackson,et al.  Glide angle in the genus Petaurus and a review of gliding in mammals , 2000 .

[16]  Karl Vernes,et al.  GLIDING PERFORMANCE OF THE NORTHERN FLYING SQUIRREL (GLAUCOMYS SABRINUS) IN MATURE MIXED FOREST OF EASTERN CANADA , 2001 .

[17]  M. G. McCay,et al.  Aerodynamic stability and maneuverability of the gliding frog Polypedates dennysi. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  Meinolf Sellmann,et al.  Symmetry Breaking , 2001, CP.

[19]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications , 2001 .

[20]  Gabriel Eduardo Torres,et al.  Aerodynamics of low aspect ratio wings at low Reynolds numbers with applications to micro air vehicle design , 2001 .

[21]  T. Kawamichi,et al.  GLIDING BEHAVIOR OF JAPANESE GIANT FLYING SQUIRRELS (PETAURISTA LEUCOGENYS) , 2002 .

[22]  J. Socha.  Kinematics: Gliding flight in the paradise tree snake , 2002, Nature.

[23]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Symmetry breaking leads to forward flapping flight , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  M. Labarbera,et al.  Effects of size and behavior on aerial performance of two species of flying snakes (Chrysopelea) , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  R. Dudley,et al.  The Cost of Living Large: Comparative Gliding Performance in Flying Lizards (Agamidae: Draco) , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[26]  M. Labarbera,et al.  A 3-D kinematic analysis of gliding in a flying snake, Chrysopelea paradisi , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  Matthew T Wilkinson,et al.  High lift function of the pteroid bone and forewing of pterosaurs , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Dragos Viieru,et al.  Membrane Wing-Based Micro Air Vehicles , 2005 .

[29]  Kristin L Bishop.  The relationship between 3-D kinematics and gliding performance in the southern flying squirrel, Glaucomys volans , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[30]  K. Breuer,et al.  The Aerodynamics of Compliant Membrane Wings Modeled on Mammalian Flight Mechanics , 2006 .