Inferring Synaptic Structure in Presence of Neural Interaction Time Scales

Biological networks display a variety of activity patterns reflecting a web of interactions that is complex both in space and time. Yet inference methods have mainly focused on reconstructing, from the network’s activity, the spatial structure, by assuming equilibrium conditions or, more recently, a probabilistic dynamics with a single arbitrary time-step. Here we show that, under this latter assumption, the inference procedure fails to reconstruct the synaptic matrix of a network of integrate-and-fire neurons when the chosen time scale of interaction does not closely match the synaptic delay or when no single time scale for the interaction can be identified; such failure, moreover, exposes a distinctive bias of the inference method that can lead to infer as inhibitory the excitatory synapses with interaction time scales longer than the model’s time-step. We therefore introduce a new two-step method, that first infers through cross-correlation profiles the delay-structure of the network and then reconstructs the synaptic matrix, and successfully test it on networks with different topologies and in different activity regimes. Although step one is able to accurately recover the delay-structure of the network, thus getting rid of any a priori guess about the time scales of the interaction, the inference method introduces nonetheless an arbitrary time scale, the time-bin dt used to binarize the spike trains. We therefore analytically and numerically study how the choice of dt affects the inference in our network model, finding that the relationship between the inferred couplings and the real synaptic efficacies, albeit being quadratic in both cases, depends critically on dt for the excitatory synapses only, whilst being basically independent of it for the inhibitory ones.

[1]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[2]  Yasser Roudi,et al.  Multi-neuronal activity and functional connectivity in cell assemblies , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[4]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Reconstruction of sparse connectivity in neural networks from spike train covariances , 2013 .

[5]  John Hertz,et al.  Ising model for inferring network structure from spike data : In Principal of Neural Coding , 2013 .

[6]  Danny Eytan,et al.  Dynamics and Effective Topology Underlying Synchronization in Networks of Cortical Neurons , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Professor Dr. Jos J. Eggermont The Correlative Brain , 1990, Studies of Brain Function.

[8]  John Hertz,et al.  Ising Models for Inferring Network Structure From Spike Data , 2011, 1106.1752.

[9]  J. Hertz,et al.  Ising model for neural data: model quality and approximate methods for extracting functional connectivity. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Uri T Eden,et al.  A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Paolo Del Giudice,et al.  Efficient Event-Driven Simulation of Large Networks of Spiking Neurons and Dynamical Synapses , 2000, Neural Computation.

[12]  David R. Cox,et al.  The Theory of Stochastic Processes , 1967, The Mathematical Gazette.

[13]  鈴木 増雄 Time-Dependent Statistics of the Ising Model , 1965 .

[14]  H. Markram,et al.  The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Mean-Field Theory of Irregularly Spiking Neuronal Populations and Working Memory in Recurrent Cortical Networks , 2003 .

[16]  W. Bialek Biophysics: Searching for Principles , 2012 .

[17]  Erik Aurell,et al.  Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience , 2022 .

[18]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Pairwise Maximum Entropy Models for Studying Large Biological Systems: When They Can Work and When They Can't , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  J. Hertz,et al.  Mean field theory for nonequilibrium network reconstruction. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[20]  S. Leibler,et al.  Neuronal couplings between retinal ganglion cells inferred by efficient inverse statistical physics methods , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Sami El Boustani,et al.  Prediction of spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity from pairwise correlations. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[22]  Misha Tsodyks,et al.  The Emergence of Up and Down States in Cortical Networks , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  C. McKean Figures , 1970, Five Long Winters.