Local value creation and eco-design: A new paradigm

Abstract De**sign has a great role to play in sustainability. Interesting progresses has been performed within the last decades. Nevertheless, some issues of sustainability, and their impact on design, remains poorly studied. Specifically, when it comes to the field of local value creation, the literature in design is still limited. However, the Local Value Creation (LVC) thinking can be a great insight for designers to develop more eco-innovative concepts, through new product design, new services and new business models. In order to go towards this direction, it is necessary to include new variables that are rarely considered in design processes such as the local workforce, sustainable local resources or the customization of the new product or service for local customers. This paper proposes a better understanding of the relation between eco-design approaches and LVC, and more precisely how current eco-design approaches consider this issue. To do so, a first part introduces the Local Value Creation concept and its challenges for sustainability. Then, a second part focuses on a literature review to understand how the LVC dimension is studied in the eco-design process. This will lead in a third section to concretely characterize how eco-design approaches and tools consider LCV issue.A last section proposes to identify potential contradiction between the LVC and the eco-design concept, in order to draw first outlines of a new eco-design paradigm with a Local Value Creation dimension.

[1]  A. Idil Gaziulusoy,et al.  A critical review of approaches available for design and innovation teams through the perspective of sustainability science and system innovation theories , 2015 .

[2]  Liang Hou,et al.  Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review , 2013 .

[3]  Ian de Vere,et al.  Socially responsible design: thinking beyond the triple bottom line to socially responsive and sustainable product design , 2011 .

[4]  Eduardo Romeiro Filho,et al.  Brazilian design for sustainability: in search of a local approach , 2015 .

[5]  André Torre,et al.  Proximité et localisation , 2004 .

[6]  Yannick Frein,et al.  What Tracks for Sustainable Production Systems in Europe , 2013 .

[7]  S. Strange Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered , 1974 .

[8]  Dean C. Ludwig Size Versus Sustainability: Environmental, Social, and Competitive Diseconomies of Scale , 1994 .

[9]  S. Jack Hu,et al.  Evolving paradigms of manufacturing: From mass production to mass customization and personalization , 2013 .

[10]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Design Research for Sustainable Social Innovation , 2007 .

[11]  K.K.B. Hon,et al.  Structure and output mechanisms in Design for Environment (DfE) tools , 2012 .

[12]  C. Lecomte,et al.  Ingénierie frugale pour les bases de la Pyramide : concevoir des produits ouverts pour des contextes multiples , 2014 .

[13]  Jin Xue,et al.  Is Eco-village and Urban Village the Future of a Degrowth Society?: An Urban Planner's Perspective , 2014 .

[14]  Eva Fraňková,et al.  Economic Localization Revisited , 2012 .

[15]  G. Seliger,et al.  Open Manufacturing for Value Creation Cycles , 2012 .

[16]  Fabrizio Ceschin,et al.  Critical factors for implementing and diffusing sustainable product-Service systems: insights from innovation studies and companies' experiences , 2013 .

[17]  A. Newton,et al.  Toward integrated analysis of human impacts on forest biodiversity: lessons from Latin America. , 2009 .

[18]  Marco Taisch,et al.  Is Sustainable Mass Customization an Oxymoron? : An Empirical Study to Analyze the Environmental Impacts of a MC Business Model , 2014 .

[19]  Manfred A. Max-Neef Development and human needs , 2017 .

[20]  Andrew N. Arnette,et al.  Design for sustainability (DFS): the intersection of supply chain and environment , 2014 .

[21]  S Boege,et al.  THE WELL-TRAVELLED YOGURT POT: LESSONS FOR NEW FREIGHT TRANSPORT POLICIES AND REGIONAL PRODUCTION , 1995 .

[22]  Sara Jane McCaffrey,et al.  The Localism Movement: Shared and Emergent Values , 2012 .

[23]  M. Mirata,et al.  Distributed economies - A new engine for innovation , 2005 .

[24]  E. Hansen,et al.  Sustainability-Oriented Innovation of SMEs: A Systematic Review , 2014 .

[25]  Adrian Tan,et al.  Service-oriented product development strategies: Product/Service-Systems (PSS) development , 2010 .

[26]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[27]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Designing for behavioural change: reducing the social impacts of product use through design , 2005 .

[28]  Nadine Pratt,et al.  Towards "human development through the market" : a comparative review of "sustainable business approaches" from a sustainable consumption and production perspective , 2008 .

[29]  Cindy Kohtala,et al.  Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review , 2015 .

[30]  E. Schlich,et al.  The Ecology of Scale: Assessment of Regional Energy Turnover and Comparison with Global Food (5 pp) , 2005 .

[31]  Jérémy Legardeur,et al.  A comparative study of ideation mechanisms used in eco-innovation tools , 2014 .

[32]  Martin Herrndorf,et al.  Towards 'Human Development through the Market' , 2008 .

[33]  Tatiana Reyes,et al.  Inclusion of territorial resources in the product development process , 2015 .

[34]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Testing the assertion that ‘local food is best’: the challenges of an evidence-based approach , 2008 .

[35]  Wolfgang Wimmer,et al.  ECODESIGN Pilot: Product Investigation, Learning and Optimization Tool for Sustainable Product Development with CD-ROM , 2001 .

[36]  Nicolas Buclet,et al.  L’économie de fonctionnalité entre éco-conception et territoire : une typologie , 2014 .

[37]  Tatiana Reyes,et al.  Governance maturity grid: a transition method for integrating sustainability into companies? , 2017 .