Bayesian integrated testing strategy to assess skin sensitization potency: from theory to practice

Frameworks to predict in vivo effects by integration of in vitro, in silico and in chemico information using mechanistic insight are needed to meet the challenges of 21st century toxicology. Expert‐based approaches that qualitatively integrate multifaceted data are practiced under the term ’weight of evidence’, whereas quantitative approaches remain rare. To address this gap we previously developed a methodology to design an Integrated Testing Strategy (ITS) in the form of a Bayesian Network (BN). This study follows up on our proof of concept work and presents an updated ITS to assess skin sensitization potency expressed as local lymph node assay (LLNA) potency classes. Modifications to the ITS structure were introduced to include better mechanistic information. The parameters of the updated ITS were calculated from an extended data set of 124 chemicals. A detailed validation analysis and a case study were carried out to demonstrate the utility of the ITS for practical application. The improved BN ITS predicted correctly 95% and 86% of chemicals in a test set (n = 21) for hazard and LLNA potency classes, respectively. The practical value of using the BN ITS is far more than a prediction framework when all data are available. The BN ITS can develop a hypothesis using subsets of data as small as one data point and can be queried on the value of adding additional tests before testing is commenced. The ITS represents key steps of the skin sensitization process and a mechanistically interpretable testing strategy can be developed. These features are illustrated in the manuscript via practical examples. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Uffe Kjærulff,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams: A Guide to Construction and Analysis , 2007, Information Science and Statistics.

[2]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[3]  Carl Westmoreland,et al.  A future approach to measuring relative skin sensitising potency: a proposal , 2006, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[4]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  Performance of a novel keratinocyte-based reporter cell line to screen skin sensitizers in vitro. , 2010, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[5]  Carsten Goebel,et al.  Assessment of the U937 cell line for the detection of contact allergens. , 2007, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[6]  Petra S. Kern,et al.  Skin Sensitization: Modeling Based on Skin Metabolism Simulation and Formation of Protein Conjugates , 2005, International journal of toxicology.

[7]  J Hilton,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay. , 1995, Methods in molecular biology.

[8]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Updating the skin sensitization in vitro data assessment paradigm in 2009 , 2009, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[9]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  Richard A Becker,et al.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a view from the chemical industry. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[11]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  The Nrf2-Keap1-ARE toxicity pathway as a cellular sensor for skin sensitizers--functional relevance and a hypothesis on innate reactions to skin sensitizers. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[12]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  Relating skin sensitizing potency to chemical reactivity: reactive Michael acceptors inhibit NF-κB signaling and are less sensitizing than S(N)Ar- and S(N)2- reactive chemicals. , 2011, Chemical research in toxicology.

[13]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Data clustering: a review , 1999, CSUR.

[14]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[15]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Skin sensitization, false positives and false negatives: experience with guinea pig assays , 2010, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[16]  P. Qiu The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2005 .

[17]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010 , 2011, Archives of Toxicology.

[18]  A. M. Api,et al.  The direct peptide reactivity assay: selectivity of chemical respiratory allergens. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[19]  T. Hartung Evidence-based toxicology - the toolbox of validation for the 21st century? , 2010, ALTEX.

[20]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Chemical allergy: translating biology into hazard characterization. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[21]  Conrad Bessant,et al.  A Novel Graph Optimisation Algorithm for the Extraction of Gene Regulatory Networks from Temporal Microarray Data , 2007, BIRD.

[22]  Albrecht Poth,et al.  Implementation challenges for designing integrated in vitro testing strategies (ITS) aiming at reducing and replacing animal experimentation. , 2012, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[23]  S. Spiekstra,et al.  A potential in vitro epidermal equivalent assay to determine sensitizer potency. , 2011, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[24]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Investigation of peptide reactivity of pro-hapten skin sensitizers using a peroxidase-peroxide oxidation system. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[25]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation of cell-based toxicity assay results , 2012, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[26]  Petra S Kern,et al.  Integrating non-animal test information into an adaptive testing strategy - skin sensitization proof of concept case. , 2011, ALTEX.

[27]  Cameron Mackay,et al.  Application of a Systems Biology Approach to Skin Allergy Risk Assessment , 2008, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[28]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  Integrated Testing Strategy (ITS) - Opportunities to better use existing data and guide future testing in toxicology. , 2010, ALTEX.

[29]  Michael B. Black,et al.  A comprehensive statistical analysis of predicting in vivo hazard using high-throughput in vitro screening. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[30]  David Heckerman,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Learning Causal Networks , 1995, UAI.

[31]  Silke Gabbert,et al.  Towards optimization of chemical testing under REACH: a Bayesian network approach to Integrated Testing Strategies. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[32]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[33]  Petra Kern,et al.  A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation , 2013, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[34]  Johannes M Nitsche,et al.  Dermal clearance model for epidermal bioavailability calculations. , 2012, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[35]  T. Sieber,et al.  Skin sensitization to p-phenylenediamine: the diverging roles of oxidation and N-acetylation for dendritic cell activation and the immune response. , 2009, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[36]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials , 2012, Archives of Toxicology.

[37]  T. Knudsen,et al.  A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing. , 2012, ALTEX.

[38]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[39]  A. Boyles,et al.  National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , 2008 .

[40]  Petra S Kern,et al.  The incorporation of lysine into the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay for skin sensitization assessments. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[41]  Hiroshi Itagaki,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of In Vitro Skin Sensitisation Tests: The Human Cell-line Activation Test (h-CLAT) versus the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) , 2010, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[42]  D. Basketter,et al.  Reproducible prediction of contact allergenic potency using the local lymph node assay , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[43]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Quantification of chemical peptide reactivity for screening contact allergens: a classification tree model approach. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[44]  James M McKim,et al.  A new in vitro method for identifying chemical sensitizers combining peptide binding with ARE/EpRE-mediated gene expression in human skin cells , 2010, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.

[45]  M. Pepe The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .

[46]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  High throughput kinetic profiling approach for covalent binding to peptides: application to skin sensitization potency of Michael acceptor electrophiles. , 2009, Chemical research in toxicology.

[47]  Hilda Witters,et al.  Assessment of chemical skin-sensitizing potency by an in vitro assay based on human dendritic cells. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[48]  Yuri Dancik,et al.  Design and performance of a spreadsheet-based model for estimating bioavailability of chemicals from dermal exposure. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.