Grizzly bear response to human development and activities in the Bow River Watershed, Alberta, Canada

Few studies have reported the effects of multiple human activities on grizzly bears, Ursus arctos. We document the degree of grizzly bear response to various human developments as a function of multiple interacting variables based on observed median distances to roads, trails and development features in a landscape where human presence is widespread. Female grizzly bears remained further than males from paved roads regardless of habitat quality or time of day. Males were found closer to paved roads when within or adjacent to high quality habitat and during the period of least human activity. The combination of traffic volume and highway configuration, however, overrides a bear’s attraction to high quality habitats for high-speed, high-volume, highways. Avoidance of busy transportation corridors was strongest in the adult segment of the population. Bears were found closer to trails during the human inactive period when within high quality habitat and further from trails when distant to high quality habitat. Our data indicated an inverse relationship between the sexes in response to vehicles and traffic noise compared to the response to human settlement and encountering people. Female bears were found further away than males in relation to vehicles and traffic noise, yet found closer than males to human settlement and places where people may be encountered. Those males that were more willing to exploit high quality habitat near roads, did so at night and where hiding cover was present. Adult females were the most risk-averse cohort, choosing to avoid humans instead of seeking out high quality habitats. Adult female grizzly bears were influenced most by human activities and development. Management agencies must maintain access to high quality habitat, especially for adult females, and create new opportunities to support the reproductive potential of the population.

[1]  B. Mclellan,et al.  Grizzly bears and resource-extraction industries: effects of roads on behaviour, habitat use and demography , 1988 .

[2]  R. Swihart.  On testing for independence of animal movements , 1997 .

[3]  S. Herrero,et al.  Using Grizzly Bear Habitat Evaluations to Locate Trails and Campsites in Kananaskis Provincial Park , 1986 .

[4]  D. Mattson.  Human impacts on bear habitat use , 1990 .

[5]  M. Soulé,et al.  Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity , 1987 .

[6]  K. Gunther.  Visitor Impact on Grizzly Bear Activity in Pelican Valley, Yellowstone National Park , 1990 .

[7]  Douglas H. Johnson.  The Insignificance of Statistical Significance Testing , 1999 .

[8]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Wildlife Underpasses in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada , 2000 .

[9]  Hans R. Zuuring,et al.  Relationships among grizzly bears, roads and habitat in the Swan Mountains, Montana , 1996 .

[10]  D. Mattson,et al.  Bear use of cutthroat trout spawning streams in Yellowstone National Park , 1990 .

[11]  M. Nadeau.  Habitats trails and campground situations associated with grizzly-human confrontations in Glacier National Park Montana , 1987 .

[12]  S Herrero,et al.  ROADS, RAILS AND GRIZZLY BEARS IN THE BOW RIVER VALLEY, ALBERTA , 1998 .

[13]  Michael L. Gibeau.  A conservation biology approach to management of grizzly bears in Banff National Park, Alberta , 2000 .

[14]  E. Hellgren,et al.  USE OF BREAKAWAY COTTON SPACERS ON RADIO COLLARS , 1988 .

[15]  L. Mech,et al.  Handbook of animal radio-tracking , 1983 .

[16]  S. Herrero.  The Canadian National Parks and Grizzly Bear Ecosystems: The Need for Interagency Management , 1994 .

[17]  K. Gunther.  Bear Management in Yellowstone National Park, 1960-93 , 1994 .

[18]  J. S. Waller,et al.  Landscape Evaluation of Grizzly Bear Habitat in Western Montana , 1999 .

[19]  Lyman L. McDonald,et al.  Survey and Comparison of Methods for Study of Resource Selection , 1998 .

[20]  D. Mattson,et al.  Yellowstone grizzly bear mortality, human habituation, and whitebark pine seed crops , 1992 .

[21]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Understanding wildlife responses to humans , 1998 .

[22]  Stephen Herrero,et al.  Bear Attacks: Their Causes and Avoidance , 1985 .

[23]  E. Crist,et al.  Application of the Tasseled Cap concept to simulated thematic mapper data , 1984 .

[24]  J. Nagy,et al.  Responses of Grizzly Bears to Hydrocarbon Exploration on Richards Island, Northwest Territories, Canada , 1980 .

[25]  Timothy L. Manley,et al.  Road and Trail Influences on Grizzly Bears and Black Bears in Northwest Montana , 1990 .

[26]  Steve Cherry,et al.  STATISTICAL TESTS IN PUBLICATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY , 1998 .

[27]  B. Mclellan,et al.  IMMEDIATE REACTIONS OF GRIZZLY BEARS TO HUMAN ACTIVITIES , 1989 .

[28]  R. Ellis,et al.  Responses of Grizzly Bears to Logging Truck Traffic in the Kimsquit River Valley, British Columbia , 1987 .

[29]  B. Mclellan,et al.  Relationships between Human Industrial Activity and Grizzly Bears , 1990 .

[30]  Richard D. Mace,et al.  Rates and Causes of Grizzly Bear Mortality in the Interior Mountains of British Columbia, Alberta, Montana, Washington, and Idaho , 1999 .

[31]  Kl Jope.  Implications of Grizzly Bear Habituation to Hikers , 1985 .

[32]  B. Mclellan,et al.  GRIZZLY BEARS AND RESOURCE-EXTRACTION INDUSTRIES: HABITAT DISPLACEMENT IN RESPONSE TO SEISMIC EXPLORATION, TIMBER HARVESTING AND ROAD MAINTENANCE , 1989 .

[33]  R. Forman,et al.  ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[34]  David J. Mattson,et al.  The Effects of Developments and Primary Roads on Grizzly Bear Habitat Use in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming , 1987 .

[35]  B. Leeson,et al.  HIGHWAY CONFLICTS AND RESOLUTIONS IN BANFF NATIONAL PARK, ALBERTA , 1996 .

[36]  R. Mace,et al.  Grizzly bear distribution and human conflicts in Jewel Basin Hiking Area, Swan Mountains, Montana. , 1996 .