Mixture Design and Compaction

The majority of current bituminous mix design procedures depend heavily on volumetric analysis, and on measuring density after a given compaction effort. There have been many questions about the influence of the compaction method on performance, and the lack of suitable simulation of field compaction in the lab. There are also concerns about the interactive effects of the laboratory mixing and compaction temperatures on the laboratory compaction methods. While there are no agreements on which method is the best in terms of simulating field conditions, there is agreement that density alone does not correctly reflect the potential of mixture to resist the damages caused by traffic loading. One of the evolving concepts to complement density and more accurately estimate this potential is characterization of aggregate skeleton and particle to particle interaction using imaging technology. However, methods of reducing images to engineering characteristics that can complement mix design procedures, and perhaps allow better simulation of field compaction, are still not in reach. This section is focused on giving background about various widely-used compaction methods, and about imaging techniques used for characterizing bituminous mixtures. It also covers a project carried out by the RILEM group on introducing the newly developed iPas software for image processing and analysis of 2D images of asphalt mixtures. As a part of this work, the software was used and verified in a large experiment that included many leading bituminous testing laboratories, from various countries.

[1]  H. M. Zelelew,et al.  Wavelet-based characterisation of aggregate segregation in asphalt concrete X-ray computed tomography images , 2011 .

[2]  T D White MARSHALL PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN AND QUALITY CONTROL OF ASPHALT MIXTURES , 1985 .

[3]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Internal structure characterization of asphalt mixtures for rutting performance using imaging analysis , 2012 .

[4]  Eyad Masad,et al.  AGGREGATE ORIENTATION AND SEGREGATION IN ASPHALT CONCRETE , 1998 .

[5]  Arif Chowdhury,et al.  Application of Imaging Technology to Improve the Laboratory and Field Compaction of HMA , 2009 .

[6]  Senthilmurugan Thyagarajan,et al.  The heterogeneity and mechanical response of hot mix asphalt laboratory specimens , 2010 .

[7]  Eyad Masad,et al.  Internal Structure Characterization of Asphalt Concrete Using Image Analysis , 1999 .

[8]  Eyad Masad,et al.  Development and Performance Prediction of Idaho Superpave Mixes , 2006 .

[9]  Andy Collop,et al.  Aggregate Orientation and Segregation in Laboratory-Compacted Asphalt Samples , 2004 .

[10]  Manfred N. Partl,et al.  Gyratory Compaction Analysis with Computer Tomography , 2003 .

[11]  Carl L Monismith,et al.  State of the Art: Bituminous Materials Mix Design , 2006 .

[12]  H. M. Zelelew,et al.  A wavelet interpretation of vehicle-pavement interaction , 2007 .

[13]  Zhong Qi Yue,et al.  APPLICATION OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING TO QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF ASPHALT CONCRETE MICROSTRUCTURE , 1995 .

[14]  Gerald A Huber,et al.  History and Future Challenges of Gyratory Compaction: 1939 to 2001 , 2002 .

[15]  A. R. Mahmud,et al.  Development of Criteria for Slab Compaction of Laboratory Roller Compactor (Turamesin) , 2007 .

[16]  Harold L Von Quintus,et al.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LABORATORY COMPACTION DEVICES BASED ON THEIR ABILITY TO PRODUCE MIXTURES WITH ENGINEERING PROPERTIES SIMILAR TO THOSE PRODUCED IN THE FIELD , 1989 .

[17]  Thomas Harman,et al.  Quantifying Laboratory Compaction Effects on the Internal Structure of Asphalt Concrete , 1999 .

[18]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Aggregate structure characterisation of asphalt mixtures using two-dimensional image analysis , 2012 .

[19]  B A Vallerga,et al.  EVOLUTION OF THE HVEEM STABILOMETER METHOD OF DESIGNING ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES , 1985 .

[20]  E. Masad,et al.  Internal structure analysis of asphalt mixes to improve the simulation of Superpave gyratory compaction to field conditions , 2001 .

[21]  Olga J. Pendleton,et al.  CORRELATION OF SELECTED LABORATORY COMPACTION METHODS WITH FIELD COMPACTION , 1994 .

[22]  Manfred N. Partl,et al.  Comparison of Laboratory Compaction Methods using X-ray Computer Tomography , 2007 .

[23]  Paving Materials,et al.  Asphalt concrete mix design : development of more rational approaches , 1989 .