Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials With Three Treatments

A fundamental question in response–adaptive randomization is: What allocation proportion should we target to achieve required power while resulting in fewer treatment failures? For comparing two treatments, such optimal allocations are well studied in the literature. However, few authors address the question for multiple treatments and the generalization of optimal allocations is necessary in practice. We are interested in finding the optimal allocation proportion, which achieves a required power of a multivariate test of homogeneity in binary response experiments while minimizing expected treatment failures at the same time. We propose such an optimal allocation for three treatments by giving an analytical solution for the optimization problem. Numerical studies show that a response–adaptive randomization procedure that targets proposed optimal allocation is superior to complete randomization. We also discuss some future research topics and additional issues on optimal adaptive designs.

[1]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Doubly adaptive biased coin designs with delayed responses , 2008 .

[2]  Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN Diets for Change in Weight and Related Risk Factors Among Overweight Premenopausal Women: The A TO Z Weight Loss Study: A Randomized Trial , 2007 .

[3]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Implementing optimal allocation for sequential continuous responses with multiple treatments , 2009 .

[4]  B. Sears Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women. , 2007, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[5]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Optimality, Variability, Power , 2003 .

[6]  N Stallard,et al.  Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials , 2001, Biometrics.

[7]  J. Lachin Sample size determinants for r X c comparative trials. , 1977, Biometrics.

[8]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Asymptotic properties of doubly adaptive biased coin designs for multitreatment clinical trials , 2003 .

[9]  J W Peabody,et al.  Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. , 2000, JAMA.

[10]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Implementing Optimal Allocation in Sequential Binary Response Experiments , 2007 .

[11]  Jeffrey R. Eisele The doubly adaptive biased coin design for sequential clinical trials , 1994 .

[12]  B. Davis,et al.  Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). , 2002, JAMA.

[13]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Asymptotically best response-adaptive randomization procedures , 2006 .