Visualization Literacy at Elementary School

This work advances our understanding of children's visualization literacy, and aims to improve it through a novel approach for teaching visualization at elementary school. We first contribute an analysis of data graphics and activities employed in grade K to 4 educational materials, and the results of a survey conducted with 16 elementary school teachers. We find that visualization education could benefit from integrating pedagogical strategies for teaching abstract concepts with established interactive visualization techniques. Building on these insights, we develop and study design principles for novel interactive teaching material aimed at increasing children's visualization literacy. We specifically contribute C'est La Vis, an online platform for teachers and students to respectively teach and learn about pictographs and bar charts, and report on our initial observations of its use in grades K and 2.

[1]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Volume 4-Domain Modeling , 2016 .

[2]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Animated Transitions in Statistical Data Graphics , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Martina A. Rau,et al.  Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning , 2017 .

[4]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Constructive visualization , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[5]  Peter Brusilovsky.  Domain Modeling for Personalized Guidance , 2016 .

[6]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  ManyEyes: a Site for Visualization at Internet Scale , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  Sung-Hee Kim,et al.  VLAT: Development of a Visualization Literacy Assessment Test , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation on Online Learning Approaches using Parallel Coordinate Visualization , 2016, CHI.

[9]  Shiqing He,et al.  VizItCards: A Card-Based Toolkit for Infovis Design Education , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[10]  Katy Börner,et al.  Investigating aspects of data visualization literacy using 20 information visualizations and 273 science museum visitors , 2016, Inf. Vis..

[11]  J.C. Roberts,et al.  State of the Art: Coordinated & Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization , 2007, Fifth International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV 2007).

[12]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Histomages: fully synchronized views for image editing , 2012, UIST '12.

[13]  H. Wainer.  A Test of Graphicacy in Children , 1980 .

[14]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts , 2010, CHI.

[15]  M. Gail Jones,et al.  Developing a Sense of Scale: Looking Backward , 2008 .

[16]  Jason Dykes,et al.  Revisiting the Need for Formal Education in Visualization , 2007, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  Michelle A. Borkin,et al.  What Makes a Visualization Memorable? , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[18]  Peter Maurer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , 2022 .

[19]  A. D. Manning,et al.  Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art , 1993 .

[20]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Teaching Information Visualization , 2008, Information Visualization.

[21]  Elsevier Sdol.  International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , 2009 .

[22]  Sharon Oviatt,et al.  The Design of Future Educational Interfaces , 2013 .

[23]  Richard A. Becker,et al.  Brushing scatterplots , 1987 .

[24]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Voyagers and voyeurs: supporting asynchronous collaborative information visualization , 2007, CHI.

[25]  Chris North,et al.  Information Visualization , 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[26]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Emily R. Fyfe,et al.  “Concreteness fading” promotes transfer of mathematical knowledge , 2012 .

[28]  Michael Halliday,et al.  On the language of physical science , 2003 .

[29]  Debbie Abilock.  Four Questions to Ask Yourself. , 2007 .

[30]  David Kirsh,et al.  Thinking with external representations , 2010, AI & SOCIETY.

[31]  Romain Vuillemot,et al.  Using Concrete Scales: A Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[32]  S. Papert.  The children's machine: rethinking school in the age of the computer , 1993 .

[33]  Vladimir M Sloutsky,et al.  The Advantage of Abstract Examples in Learning Math , 2008, Science.

[34]  Mohsen Ghadessy,et al.  Registers of written English : situational factors and linguistic features , 1991 .

[35]  Debbie Abilock.  Visual Information Literacy: Reading a Documentary Photograph. , 2008 .

[36]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Concreteness Fading in Mathematics and Science Instruction: a Systematic Review , 2014 .

[37]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Abstract or concrete examples in learning mathematics? A replication and elaboration of Kaminski, Sloutsky, and Heckler’s study , 2011 .

[38]  Richard Cox,et al.  Diagrams in the UK National School Curriculum , 2008, Diagrams.

[39]  Steven Franconeri,et al.  ISOTYPE Visualization: Working Memory, Performance, and Engagement with Pictographs , 2015, CHI.

[40]  Hanspeter Pfister,et al.  Beyond Memorability: Visualization Recognition and Recall , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[41]  Hosin Shirvani.  National Library of Virtual Manipulatives , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[42]  Kimberle Koile,et al.  Supporting Feedback and Assessment of Digital Ink Answers to In-Class Exercises , 2007, AAAI.

[43]  Kwan-Liu Ma.  Teaching visualization , 2005, COMG.

[44]  Klaus Mueller,et al.  Learning Visualizations by Analogy: Promoting Visual Literacy through Visualization Morphing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[45]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Developing model-based reasoning in mathematics and science , 2000 .

[46]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Graphs as aids to knowledge construction: Signaling techniques for guiding the process of graph comprehension. , 1999 .

[47]  James R. Eagan,et al.  Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization , 2005, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005..

[48]  William G. Griswold,et al.  Ubiquitous presenter: increasing student access and control in a digital lecturing environment , 2005, SIGCSE '05.

[49]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  MathPad2: a system for the creation and exploration of mathematical sketches , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[50]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[51]  Jean-Daniel Fekete,et al.  A Principled Way of Assessing Visualization Literacy , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[52]  Vasilis Koulaidis,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Visual Images in School Science Textbooks and Press Articles about Science and Technology , 2003 .

[53]  Kimberle Koile,et al.  Machine Interpretation of Students’ Hand-Drawn Mathematical Representations , 2015 .

[54]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Toward Combining Individual and Collaborative Learning Within an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2015, AIED.

[55]  Gitta Domik.  Do We Need Formal Education in Visualization? , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[56]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems with Multiple Representations and Self-Explanation Prompts Support Learning of Fractions , 2009, AIED.