Development of Eco-Friendly Ramp Control for Connected and Automated Electric Vehicles

Author(s): Wu, Guoyuan; Zhao, Zhouqiao; Wang, Ziran; Barth, Matthew J. | Abstract: With on-board sensors such as camera, radar, and Lidar, connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) can sense the surrounding environment and be driven autonomously and safely by themselves without colliding into other objects on the road. CAVs are also able to communicate with each other and roadside infrastructure via vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications, respectively, sharing information on the vehicles’ states, signal phase and timing (SPaT) information, enabling CAVs to make decisions in a collaborative manner. As a typical scenario, ramp control attracts wide attention due to the concerns of safety and mobility in the merging area. In particular, if the line-of-the-sight is blocked (because of grade separation), then neither mainline vehicles nor on-ramp vehicles may well adapt their own dynamics to perform smoothed merging maneuvers. This may lead to speed fluctuations or even shockwave propagating upstream traffic along the corridor, thus potentially increasing the traffic delays and excessive energy consumption. In this project, the research team proposed a hierarchical ramp merging system that not only allowed microscopic cooperative maneuvers for connected and automated electric vehicles on the ramp to merge into mainline traffic flow, but also had controllability of ramp inflow rate, which enabled macroscopic traffic flow control. A centralized optimal control-based approach was proposed to both smooth the merging flow and improve the system-wide mobility of the network. Linear quadratic trackers in both finite horizon and receding horizon forms were developed to solve the optimization problem in terms of path planning and sequence determination, and a microscopic electric vehicle (EV) energy consumption model was applied to estimate the energy consumption. The simulation results confirmed that under the regulated inflow rate, the proposed system was able to avoid potential traffic congestion and improve the mobility (in terms of average speed) as much as 115%, compared to the conventional ramp metering and the ramp without any control approach. Interestingly, for EVs (connected and automated EVs in this study), the improved mobility may not necessarily result in the reduction of energy consumption. The “sweet spot” of average speed ranges from 27–34 mph for the EV models in this study.View the NCST Project Webpage

[1]  H. Payne,et al.  Suboptimal control of linear systems by augmentation with application to freeway traffic regulation , 1973 .

[2]  Atsuya Uno,et al.  A merging control algorithm based on inter-vehicle communication , 1999, Proceedings 199 IEEE/IEEJ/JSAI International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (Cat. No.99TH8383).

[3]  M J Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  C.M. Clark,et al.  Distributed platoon assignment and lane selection for traffic flow optimization , 2008, 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[5]  G. F. Newell A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part I: General theory , 1993 .

[6]  Andreas A. Malikopoulos,et al.  Automated and Cooperative Vehicle Merging at Highway On-Ramps , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Cooperative traffic control of a mixed network with two urban regions and a freeway , 2013 .

[8]  Ridha Hamila,et al.  Literature Review of Advancements in Adaptive Ramp Metering , 2016, ANT/SEIT.

[9]  Ali Ghaffari,et al.  A Modified Car-Following Model Based on a Neural Network Model of the Human Driver Effects , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[10]  Cynthia Taylor,et al.  Fuzzy Ramp Metering: Design Overview and Simulation Results , 1998 .

[11]  P. I. Richards Shock Waves on the Highway , 1956 .

[12]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  MODELLING AND REAL-TIME CONTROL OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON THE BOULEVARD PERIPHERIQUE IN PARIS , 1990 .

[13]  Hwasoo Yeo,et al.  Data-Driven Imputation Method for Traffic Data in Sectional Units of Road Links , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  Guoyuan Wu,et al.  Distributed Consensus-Based Cooperative Highway On-Ramp Merging Using V2X Communications , 2018 .

[15]  N. B. Goldstein,et al.  A decentralized control strategy for freeway regulation , 1982 .

[16]  D. Helbing,et al.  DERIVATION, PROPERTIES, AND SIMULATION OF A GAS-KINETIC-BASED, NONLOCAL TRAFFIC MODEL , 1999, cond-mat/9901240.

[17]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  Collaborative merging strategy for freeway ramp operations in a connected and autonomous vehicles environment , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[18]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Hero coordinated ramp metering implemented at the Monash Freeway , 2010 .

[19]  Yorgos J. Stephanedes,et al.  Implementation of on-line zone control strategies for optimal ramp metering in the Minneapolis Ring Road , 1994 .

[20]  Bart De Schutter,et al.  Model predictive control for optimal coordination of ramp metering and variable speed limits , 2005 .

[21]  Leslie N Jacobson,et al.  REAL-TIME METERING ALGORITHM FOR CENTRALIZED CONTROL , 1989 .

[22]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Optimal Perimeter Control for Two Urban Regions With Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: A Model Predictive Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[23]  R. E. Fenton Automatic vehicle guidance and control—A state of the art survey , 1970 .

[24]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  A Misapplication of the Local Ramp Metering Strategy ALINEA , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[25]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Expert Level Control of Ramp Metering Based on Multi-Task Deep Reinforcement Learning , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[26]  Andreas A. Malikopoulos,et al.  A Survey on the Coordination of Connected and Automated Vehicles at Intersections and Merging at Highway On-Ramps , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[27]  C. Daganzo THE CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL.. , 1994 .

[28]  Chien-Hung Wei,et al.  APPLYING AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK MODEL TO FREEWAY RAMP METERING CONTROL , 1996 .

[29]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[30]  Jeich Mar,et al.  An ANFIS controller for the car-following collision prevention system , 2001, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[31]  Guoyuan Wu,et al.  A hybrid approach to estimating electric vehicle energy consumption for ecodriving applications , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[32]  Stephan Olariu,et al.  On a Variant of the Mobile Observer Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[33]  Riccardo Scarinci,et al.  Control Concepts for Facilitating Motorway On-ramp Merging Using Intelligent Vehicles , 2014 .

[34]  Stephen G. Ritchie,et al.  FREEWAY RAMP METERING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS , 1997 .

[35]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Car-following: a historical review , 1999 .

[36]  Gurulingesh Raravi,et al.  Merge Algorithms for Intelligent Vehicles , 2007 .

[37]  Benjamin Coifman,et al.  Estimating travel times and vehicle trajectories on freeways using dual loop detectors , 2002 .

[38]  Edward Chung,et al.  Local On-ramp Queue Management Strategy with Mainline Speed Recovery , 2012 .

[39]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Local ramp metering with distant downstream bottlenecks: A comparative study , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[40]  Ali Ghaffari,et al.  Neural-network-based modeling and prediction of the future state of a Stop&Go behavior in urban areas , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES 2012).

[41]  Cynthia Taylor,et al.  EVALUATION OF A FUZZY LOGIC RAMP METERING ALGORITHM: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AMONG THREE RAMP METERING ALGORITHMS USED IN THE GREATER SEATTLE AREA , 2000 .

[42]  Karthik K. Srinivasan,et al.  Evaluation of Different Vehicle Following Models Under Mixed Traffic Conditions , 2013 .

[43]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Real-time freeway traffic state estimation based on extended Kalman filter: a general approach , 2005 .

[44]  Bin Ran,et al.  A MICROSCOPIC SIMULATION MODEL FOR MERGING CONTROL ON A DEDICATED-LANE AUTOMATED HIGHWAY SYSTEM , 1999 .

[45]  Kotagiri Ramamohanarao,et al.  Optimal traffic merging strategy for communication- and sensor-enabled vehicles , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[46]  Michael Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of On-ramp Control Algorithms , 2001 .

[47]  Ali Emadi,et al.  Modern electric, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicles : fundamentals, theory, and design , 2009 .

[48]  Jianwei Gong,et al.  Coordinated Ramp Metering with Equity Consideration Using Reinforcement Learning , 2017 .

[49]  Harold J Payne,et al.  MODELS OF FREEWAY TRAFFIC AND CONTROL. , 1971 .

[50]  Ashish Bhaskar,et al.  Optimal Vehicle Trajectory Planning With Control Constraints and Recursive Implementation for Automated On-Ramp Merging , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[51]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Traffic state estimation on highway: A comprehensive survey , 2017, Annu. Rev. Control..

[52]  B D Greenshields,et al.  A study of traffic capacity , 1935 .

[53]  William E. Schiesser,et al.  Linear and nonlinear waves , 2009, Scholarpedia.

[54]  Hussein Dia,et al.  Comparative evaluation of microscopic car-following behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[55]  Eduardo Mario Nebot,et al.  A bayesian approach for driving behavior inference , 2011, 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[56]  Stefan Krauss,et al.  MICROSCOPIC MODELING OF TRAFFIC FLOW: INVESTIGATION OF COLLISION FREE VEHICLE DYNAMICS. , 1998 .

[57]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Incorporating human-factors in car-following models : a review of recent developments and research needs , 2014 .

[58]  P Perovich,et al.  SYSTEM WIDE ADAPTIVE RAMP METERING (SWARM) , 1997 .

[59]  Guoyuan Wu,et al.  Cooperative Ramp Merging System: Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation Using Game Engine , 2019, SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles.

[60]  Walid Gomaa,et al.  Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Control for Ramp Metering , 2014, ICSEng.

[61]  Xiao-Yun Lu,et al.  Longitudinal control algorithm for automated vehicle merging , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[62]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  A flow-maximizing adaptive local ramp metering strategy , 2004 .

[63]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Integrated driving behavior modeling , 2007 .

[64]  Thorsten Schmidt-Dumont,et al.  Decentralised reinforcement learning for ramp metering and variable speed limits on highways , 2017 .

[65]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[66]  Gunther Schmidt,et al.  A two-layer control scheme for merging of automated vehicles , 1983, The 22nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[67]  Peng Hao,et al.  Prediction-Based Eco-Approach and Departure at Signalized Intersections With Speed Forecasting on Preceding Vehicles , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[68]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A DYNAMIC RAMP METERING CONTROL MODEL , 1997 .

[69]  Jie Huang,et al.  A self-learning system for local ramp metering with queue management , 2017 .