Making Sense of Issues Through Media Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis

How do people make sense of politics? Integrating empirical results in communication studies on framing with models of comprehension in cognitive psychology, we argue that people understand complicated event sequences by organizing information in a manner that conforms to the structure of a good story. To test this claim, we carried out a pair of experiments. In each, we presented people with news reports on the 1999 Kosovo crisis that were framed in story form, either to promote or prevent U.S. intervention. Consistent with expectations, we found that framing news about the crisis as a story affected what people remembered, how they structured what they remembered, and the opinions they expressed on the actions government should take.

[1]  R. Rich,et al.  Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship , 2000, The Journal of Politics.

[2]  M. Prior,et al.  News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout , 2005 .

[3]  B. Hamm Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy , 2004 .

[4]  Vincent Price,et al.  SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION AND PUBLIC OPINION EFFECTS OF COMMUNICATING GROUP CONFLICT , 1989 .

[5]  D. Rumelhart NOTES ON A SCHEMA FOR STORIES , 1975 .

[6]  P. Sniderman,et al.  CHAPTER 5: The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing , 2004 .

[7]  John R. Zaller The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion: Tests of the one-message model , 1992 .

[8]  R. Petty,et al.  Need for Cognition and Need to Evaluate in the 1998 National Election Survey Pilot Study , 2000 .

[9]  A. Lupia Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[10]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion , 1996, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  Piet Schenelaars,et al.  Public opinion , 2013, BDJ.

[12]  D. O. Sears College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[13]  M. Brewer,et al.  The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories , 1989 .

[14]  Dennis Chong Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society , 2000 .

[15]  Jeffrey W. Koch,et al.  Political Rhetoric and Political Persuasion: The Changing Structure of Citizens' Preferences on Health Insurance during Policy Debate , 1998 .

[16]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[17]  J. Boster,et al.  Form or Function: A Comparison of Expert and Novice Judgments of Similarity Among Fish , 1989 .

[18]  N. Pennington,et al.  Inside the Jury. , 1985 .

[19]  Kathleen M. McGraw,et al.  An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[20]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Mark R. Joslyn,et al.  Gun Policy, Opinion, Tragedy, and Blame Attribution: The Conditional Influence of Issue Frames , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[22]  W. Lippmann The Phantom Public , 1925 .

[23]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[24]  W. Gamson,et al.  The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action , 1987 .

[25]  J. R. Kluegel,et al.  Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes? , 1993 .

[26]  Dennis Chong How People Think, Reason, and Feel about Rights and Liberties , 1993 .

[27]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[28]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment , 1988 .

[29]  R. Schank,et al.  Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story , 1995 .

[30]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[31]  D. Kinder,et al.  Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals , 1996 .

[32]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects , 1997 .

[33]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  P. Sopp Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[35]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. , 1992 .

[36]  D. Kinder,et al.  Mimicking Political Debate with Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative Action for Blacks , 1990 .

[37]  James N. Druckman,et al.  The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence , 2001 .

[38]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  Media Framing and Effective Public Deliberation , 2000 .

[39]  David P. Redlawsk,et al.  Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making , 2001 .

[40]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment , 2000 .

[41]  Martin Gilens,et al.  Why Americans Hate Welfare , 1997 .

[42]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology , 1991 .

[43]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .

[44]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Projections of power : framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy , 2003 .

[45]  N. Pennington,et al.  Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. , 1986 .

[46]  N. Pennington,et al.  The story model for juror decision making , 1993 .

[47]  Anthony Peter Macmillan Coxon,et al.  Sorting Data: Collection and Analysis , 1999 .

[48]  James N. Druckman,et al.  Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[49]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[50]  Tali Mendelberg,et al.  Executing Hortons: Racial Crime in the 1988 Presidential Campaign , 1997 .

[51]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  The Meaning and Measure of Policy Metaphors , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[52]  N. Pennington,et al.  Reasoning in explanation-based decision making , 1993, Cognition.

[53]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Is covert attention really unnecessary? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[54]  D. Mckie,et al.  Talking Politics , 1975, The Lancet.

[55]  W. Gamson,et al.  The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy , 1980 .